Department of Orthopedics, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Department of Orthopaedics, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2024 May-Aug;32(2):10225536241277604. doi: 10.1177/10225536241277604.
Platelet-rich plasma treatment delays the need for total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, its use and preparation remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma and post-treatment pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma over medium- and long-term follow-up periods and identified other factors that may affect treatment outcomes.
In this retrospective study, 225 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent knee platelet-rich plasma treatment from June 2021 to January 2022, were examined at three study centres. Patients were categorised, based on the type and amount of anticoagulant used during platelet-rich plasma preparation, into 4% sodium citrate (SC) 0.6 mL, 4% SC 1 mL, 4% SC 2 mL, heparin 0.1 mL, and heparin 0.2 mL groups. We analysed the patients' basic information, pain after treatment, and inflammatory markers (i.e., interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor-α, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein) in the joint fluid via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and joint fluid crystallisation. Additionally, we assessed the patients' Western Ontario and McMaster University scores and minimal clinically significant differences after treatment.
Patients in the 4% SC 0.6 mL and heparin 0.1 mL groups experienced less pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment than did patients in the high-dose anticoagulant group. The joint fluid of patients with pain in these groups had lower levels of inflammatory markers. Patients treated with SC had slightly better medium- and long-term therapeutic outcomes than did patients treated with heparin. Patients with poorly controlled hyperuricemia also experienced pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment.
The results suggest that platelet-rich plasma prepared using high-dose anticoagulants or administered to patients with poorly controlled hyperuricaemia may lead to moderate-to-severe knee pain and joint effusion after joint puncture therapy. Platelet-rich plasma had a therapeutic effect on knee osteoarthritis; however, its efficacy gradually decreased over time. SC anticoagulant is more suitable for platelet-rich plasma preparation than is heparin. Further studies are needed to understand the safety and the various factors influencing platelet-rich plasma therapy.
富含血小板的血浆治疗可延迟膝关节骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换的需求。然而,其使用和准备仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是探讨富含血小板的血浆制备过程中抗凝剂的使用与膝关节骨关节炎患者治疗后疼痛之间的关系。此外,我们还探讨了富含血小板的血浆在中、长期随访期间的疗效,并确定了可能影响治疗结果的其他因素。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们在三个研究中心检查了 225 名膝关节骨关节炎患者,这些患者于 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 1 月接受了膝关节血小板富血浆治疗。根据富含血小板的血浆制备过程中使用的抗凝剂的类型和量,将患者分为 4%柠檬酸钠(SC)0.6mL、4%SC1mL、4%SC2mL、肝素 0.1mL 和肝素 0.2mL 组。我们通过酶联免疫吸附试验和关节液结晶分析了患者的基本信息、治疗后疼痛以及关节液中的炎症标志物(即白细胞介素 6、肿瘤坏死因子-α和超敏 C 反应蛋白)。此外,我们还评估了患者治疗后的西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学评分和最小临床显著差异。
与高剂量抗凝剂组相比,4%SC0.6mL 和肝素 0.1mL 组的患者在接受富含血小板的血浆治疗后疼痛较轻。这些组中疼痛患者的关节液中炎症标志物水平较低。接受 SC 治疗的患者在中、长期治疗结果方面略优于接受肝素治疗的患者。血尿酸控制不佳的患者在接受富含血小板的血浆治疗后也会出现疼痛。
结果表明,使用高剂量抗凝剂制备或用于血尿酸控制不佳的患者的富含血小板的血浆可能会导致关节穿刺治疗后膝关节出现中重度疼痛和关节积液。富含血小板的血浆对膝关节骨关节炎有治疗作用;然而,其疗效随时间逐渐下降。与肝素相比,SC 抗凝剂更适合富含血小板的血浆制备。需要进一步的研究来了解富含血小板的血浆治疗的安全性和各种影响因素。