Yavuz Tuba, Clezy Kate, Skender Kristina, Goldberg Jacob, Vallières Frédérique
Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Operational Centre Amsterdam (OCA), Médecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Jul 18;6(3):100385. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100385. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Both high- and low-income countries reported increased antibiotic consumption among COVID-19 patients during the first months of the pandemic. To date, however, no studies have examined changes in antibiotic consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic within humanitarian emergency contexts.
Data was collected by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) for the years 2018-2021 across the following humanitarian settings: Afghanistan (Lashkar Gah), Bangladesh (Kutupalong), the Democratic Republic of Congo (Mweso and Baraka), and South Sudan (Bentiu). Inpatient and outpatient antibiotic consumption was calculated as Daily Defined Dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day, as per the World Health Organisation's (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, using an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was used to analyse retrospective monthly antibiotic consumption. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic was evaluated as total antibiotic consumption and according to WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) group classifications within each humanitarian setting.
The COVID-19 pandemic had no statistically significant impact on total antibiotic consumption in South Sudan (Bentiu) and Bangladesh (Kutupalong). Similarly, the pandemic had no impact on total antibiotic consumption in DR Congo (Baraka), despite an initial 0.27% (estimate=.274, p-value=0.006) increase in March 2020 driven by Access group antibiotics. Meanwhile, total antibiotic consumption in DR Congo (Mweso) and Afghanistan (Lashkar Gah) declined by 0.74% (estimate = -.744, p = 0.003) and 0.26% (estimate = -.26, p < 0.001), respectively with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Further studies are required to investigate what may have contributed to these results.
高收入国家和低收入国家均报告称,在疫情爆发的头几个月里,新冠患者的抗生素使用量有所增加。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究考察人道主义紧急情况下新冠疫情期间抗生素使用量的变化。
无国界医生组织(MSF)收集了2018年至2021年期间以下人道主义环境中的数据:阿富汗(拉什卡尔加)、孟加拉国(库图帕朗)、刚果民主共和国(姆韦索和巴拉卡)以及南苏丹(本提乌)。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)药物统计方法合作中心的标准,住院和门诊抗生素使用量按每1000居民每天的限定日剂量(DDD)计算。使用自回归积分滑动平均(ARIMA)模型的中断时间序列(ITS)分析来分析回顾性月度抗生素使用量。根据每个人道主义环境中的总抗生素使用量以及WHO的获取、观察、储备(AWaRe)组分类来评估新冠疫情的影响。
新冠疫情对南苏丹(本提乌)和孟加拉国(库图帕朗)的总抗生素使用量没有统计学上的显著影响。同样,疫情对刚果民主共和国(巴拉卡)的总抗生素使用量也没有影响,尽管2020年3月由获取组抗生素推动出现了0.27%(估计值 = 0.274,p值 = 0.006)的初始增长。与此同时,刚果民主共和国(姆韦索)和阿富汗(拉什卡尔加)的总抗生素使用量在新冠疫情期间分别下降了0.74%(估计值 = -0.744,p = 0.003)和0.26%(估计值 = -0.26,p < 0.001)。
需要进一步研究来调查这些结果可能的成因。