Tatarczuch Maciej, Lewis Katharine Louise, Gunjur Ashray, Shaw Briony, Poon Li Mei, Paul Erin, Ku Matthew, Wong Mark, Ai Sylvia, Beekman Ashley, Ciaccio Pietro R Di, Krigstein Michael, Wight Joel, Coombes Caitlin, Gilbertson Michael, Tey Amanda, Shortt Jake, Nagarajan Chandramouli, Talaulikar Dipti, Hamad Nada, Ratnasingam Sumita, Ho Shir-Jing, Cochrane Tara, Hawkes Eliza A, Cheah Chan Y, Opat Stephen, Gregory Gareth P
Monash Haematology, Monash Health Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia.
School of Clinical Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
EJHaem. 2024 Jun 21;5(4):709-720. doi: 10.1002/jha2.951. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Despite recent advances, optimal therapeutic approaches applicable to subpopulations with primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma outside of clinical trials remain to be determined.
We performed a retrospective study of immunocompetent, adult patients with histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the CNS (PCNSL). 190/204 (93%) patients (median age: 65) received one of five high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) containing chemotherapy regimens: MPV/Ara-C (HD-MTX, procarbazine, and vincristine, followed by cytarabine [Ara-C]) ( = 94, 50%), MATRix (HD-MTX, Ara-C, thiotepa, and rituximab) ( = 19, 10%), HD-MTX/Ara-C ( = 31, 16%), HD-MTX monotherapy ( = 35, 18%) and MBVP (HD-MTX, carmustine, teniposide, prednisolone) ( = 11, 6%).
Cumulative median HD-MTX and Ara-C doses were 17 g/m (range: 1-64 g/m) and 12 g/m (0-32 g/m) respectively. Using 14 g/m as the reference dose, the median HD-MTX relative dose intensity (HD-MTX-RDI) was 1.25 (0.27-4.57) with 84% receiving > 0.75. The overall response rate (ORR) was 72% (complete response: 50%) after completing HD-MTX. At a median follow-up of 3.41 years (0.06-9.42), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were different between chemotherapy cohorts, with the best outcomes achieved in the MPV/Ara-C cohort (2-year PFS 74%, 2-year OS 82%; = 0.0001 and = 0.0024 respectively). On multivariate analysis, MPV/Ara-C administration and HD-MTX-RDI > 0.75 were associated with longer PFS and OS.
Sequential, response-adapted approaches can improve outcomes, even in older patients who are ineligible for a high-intensity concurrent chemotherapy approach and do not undergo traditional consolidative strategies.
尽管最近取得了进展,但适用于临床试验之外原发性中枢神经系统(CNS)淋巴瘤亚群的最佳治疗方法仍有待确定。
我们对免疫功能正常的成年中枢神经系统组织学确诊弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(PCNSL)患者进行了一项回顾性研究。190/204(93%)例患者(中位年龄:65岁)接受了五种含大剂量甲氨蝶呤(HD-MTX)化疗方案之一:MPV/Ara-C(HD-MTX、丙卡巴肼和长春新碱,随后是阿糖胞苷[Ara-C])(n = 94,50%)、MATRix(HD-MTX、Ara-C、噻替派和利妥昔单抗)(n = 19,10%)、HD-MTX/Ara-C(n = 31,16%)、HD-MTX单药治疗(n = 35,18%)和MBVP(HD-MTX、卡莫司汀、替尼泊苷、泼尼松)(n = 11,6%)。
HD-MTX和Ara-C的累积中位剂量分别为17 g/m²(范围:1 - 64 g/m²)和12 g/m²(0 - 32 g/m²)。以每平方米14克为参考剂量,HD-MTX的中位相对剂量强度(HD-MTX-RDI)为1.25(0.27 - 4.57),84%的患者接受剂量>0.75。完成HD-MTX治疗后的总缓解率(ORR)为72%(完全缓解:50%)。中位随访3.41年(0.06 - 9.42),化疗队列之间的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)有所不同,MPV/Ara-C队列的结局最佳(2年PFS 74%,2年OS 82%;分别为P = 0.0001和P = 0.0024)。多因素分析显示,MPV/Ara-C给药和HD-MTX-RDI>0.75与更长的PFS和OS相关。
即使在不符合高强度同步化疗方法且未接受传统巩固治疗策略的老年患者中,序贯、根据反应调整的方法也可改善结局。