• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科分诊、转运时间及医院死亡率:一项回顾性重复与延续性研究

Emergency Department Triage, Transfer Times, and Hospital Mortality of Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Retrospective Replication and Continuation Study.

作者信息

van Herwerden Michael C, Groenland Carline N L, Termorshuizen Fabian, Rietdijk Wim J R, Blokzijl Fredrike, Cleffken Berry I, Dormans Tom, Epker Jelle L, Feyz Lida, Gritters van den Oever Niels, van der Heiden Pim, de Jonge Evert, Latten Gideon H P, Pruijsten Ralph V, Sir Özcan, Spronk Peter E, Vermeijden Wytze J, van Vliet Peter, de Keizer Nicolette F, den Uil Corstiaan A

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 1;52(12):1856-1865. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006396. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006396
PMID:39158382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11556817/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to provide new insights into the impact of emergency department (ED) to ICU time on hospital mortality, stratifying patients by academic and nonacademic teaching (NACT) hospitals, and considering Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-IV probability and ED-triage scores.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2009-2020) using data from the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation registry. Patients directly admitted from the ED to the ICU were included from four academic and eight NACT hospitals. Odds ratios (ORs) for mortality associated with ED-to-ICU time were estimated using multivariable regression, both crude and after adjusting for and stratifying by APACHE-IV probability and ED-triage scores.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 28,455 patients were included. The median ED-to-ICU time was 1.9 hours (interquartile range, 1.2-3.1 hr). No overall association was observed between ED-to-ICU time and hospital mortality after adjusting for APACHE-IV probability ( p = 0.36). For patients with an APACHE-IV probability greater than 55.4% (highest quintile) and an ED-to-ICU time greater than 3.4 hours the adjusted OR (ORs adjApache ) was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.00-1.54; p < 0.05) as compared with the reference category (< 1.1 hr). In the academic hospitals, the ORs adjApache for ED-to-ICU times of 1.6-2.3, 2.3-3.4, and greater than 3.4 hours were 1.21 (1.01-1.46), 1.21 (1.00-1.46), and 1.34 (1.10-1.64), respectively. In NACT hospitals, no association was observed ( p = 0.07). Subsequently, ORs were adjusted for ED-triage score (ORs adjED ). In the academic hospitals the ORs adjED for ED-to-ICU times greater than 3.4 hours was 0.98 (0.81-1.19), no overall association was observed ( p = 0.08). In NACT hospitals, all time-ascending quintiles had ORs adjED values of less than 1.0 ( p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with the highest APACHE-IV probability at academic hospitals, a prolonged ED-to-ICU time was associated with increased hospital mortality. We found no significant or consistent unfavorable association in lower APACHE-IV probability groups and NACT hospitals. The association between longer ED-to-ICU time and higher mortality was not found after adjustment and stratification for ED-triage score.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过学术性和非学术性教学(NACT)医院对患者进行分层,并考虑急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)-IV概率和急诊分诊评分,从而深入了解急诊科(ED)到重症监护病房(ICU)的时间对医院死亡率的影响。

设计、地点和患者:我们使用荷兰国家重症监护评估登记处的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究(2009 - 2020年)。从四家学术性医院和八家NACT医院纳入了直接从急诊科转入ICU的患者。使用多变量回归估计与ED到ICU时间相关的死亡率的比值比(OR),包括粗比值比以及在根据APACHE-IV概率和急诊分诊评分进行调整和分层之后的比值比。

干预措施

无。

测量指标和主要结果

共纳入28455例患者。ED到ICU的中位时间为1.9小时(四分位间距,1.2 - 3.1小时)。在根据APACHE-IV概率进行调整后,未观察到ED到ICU时间与医院死亡率之间的总体关联(p = 0.36)。对于APACHE-IV概率大于55.4%(最高五分位数)且ED到ICU时间大于3.4小时的患者,与参考类别(< 1.1小时)相比,调整后的OR(ORs adjApache)为1.24(95% CI,1.00 - 1.54;p < 0.05)。在学术性医院中,ED到ICU时间为1.6 - 2.3小时、2.3 - 3.4小时以及大于3.4小时的ORs adjApache分别为1.21(1.01 - 1.46)、1.21(1.00 - 1.46)和1.34(1.10 - 1.64)。在NACT医院中,未观察到关联(p = 0.07)。随后,根据急诊分诊评分对OR进行调整(ORs adjED)。在学术性医院中,ED到ICU时间大于3.4小时的ORs adjED为0.98(0.81 - 1.19),未观察到总体关联(p = 0.08)。在NACT医院中,所有时间递增的五分位数的ORs adjED值均小于1.0(p < 0.01)。

结论

在学术性医院中APACHE-IV概率最高的患者中,延长的ED到ICU时间与医院死亡率增加相关。在APACHE-IV概率较低的组和NACT医院中,我们未发现显著或一致的不利关联。在根据急诊分诊评分进行调整和分层后,未发现较长的ED到ICU时间与较高死亡率之间的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4087/11556817/c016c7fb5d20/ccm-52-1856-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4087/11556817/c016c7fb5d20/ccm-52-1856-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4087/11556817/c016c7fb5d20/ccm-52-1856-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency Department Triage, Transfer Times, and Hospital Mortality of Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Retrospective Replication and Continuation Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科分诊、转运时间及医院死亡率:一项回顾性重复与延续性研究
Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 1;52(12):1856-1865. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006396. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Emergency Department to ICU Time Is Associated With Hospital Mortality: A Registry Analysis of 14,788 Patients From Six University Hospitals in The Netherlands.急诊到 ICU 时间与住院死亡率相关:来自荷兰六所大学医院的 14788 例患者的注册分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1564-1571. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003957.
3
The effect of treatment and clinical course during Emergency Department stay on severity scoring and predicted mortality risk in Intensive Care patients.在急诊部停留期间的治疗和临床过程对重症监护患者的严重程度评分和预测死亡风险的影响。
Crit Care. 2022 Apr 19;26(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03986-2.
4
Risk factors for unplanned transfer to intensive care within 24 hours of admission from the emergency department in an integrated healthcare system.综合医疗体系中,急诊入院 24 小时内转入重症监护病房的风险因素。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Jan;8(1):13-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1979. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
5
Emergency physician-based intensive care unit for critically ill patients visiting emergency department.基于急诊科医生的危重症患者重症监护病房,用于接待前来急诊科就诊的危重症患者。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;38(11):2277-2282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
6
Outcomes of patients admitted to tertiary intensive care units after interhospital transfer: comparison with patients admitted from emergency departments.院际转运后入住三级重症监护病房患者的结局:与急诊科收治患者的比较。
Crit Care Resusc. 2008 Jun;10(2):97-105.
7
Outcomes of direct and indirect medical intensive care unit admissions from the emergency department of an acute care hospital: a retrospective cohort study.急性护理医院急诊科直接和间接入住医学重症监护病房的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 27;4(11):e005553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005553.
8
Racial disparities in emergency department length of stay for admitted patients in the United States.美国住院患者在急诊科停留时间的种族差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 May;16(5):403-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00381.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
9
"One-way-street" streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay.“单行道”式优化流程对危重症创伤患者的收治可缩短急诊科停留时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):1019-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
10
Impact of Telemonitoring of Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients Awaiting ICU Transfer.危重症急诊患者 ICU 转运前远程监护的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1201-1207. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003847.

本文引用的文献

1
Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST-elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ARREST): a UK prospective, multicentre, parallel, randomised clinical trial.非 ST 段抬高院外心搏骤停(ARREST)患者行紧急转运至心搏骤停中心:一项英国前瞻性、多中心、平行、随机临床试验。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1329-1337. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01351-X. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
2
Correction: The effect of treatment and clinical course during Emergency Department stay on severity scoring and predicted mortality risk in Intensive Care patients.更正:急诊科留观期间的治疗效果及临床病程对重症监护患者严重程度评分及预测死亡风险的影响
Crit Care. 2022 May 11;26(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04008-x.
3
Reliability and validity of the Netherlands Triage Standard in emergency care settings: a case scenario study.
荷兰分诊标准在紧急护理环境中的可靠性和有效性:案例情景研究。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Aug;39(8):623-627. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211359. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care.欧洲复苏理事会和欧洲危重病医学会指南 2021:复苏后护理。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):369-421. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06368-4. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Factors associated with shockable versus non-shockable rhythms in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest.住院心脏骤停患者中与可电击心律和不可电击心律相关的因素。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Boarding of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department.急诊危重症患者的收治。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):1180-1187. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004385.
7
The authors reply.作者回复。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):e254. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004187.
8
Is the Severity of Illness a Confounder or Mediator for the Association Between Emergency Department Length of Stay and Hospital Mortality?疾病严重程度是急诊留观时间与医院死亡率之间关联的混杂因素还是中介因素?
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):e253-e254. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004108.
9
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV Probability of Mortality Is an Intermediate Variable, Not a Confounder.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估IV:死亡概率是一个中间变量,而非混杂因素。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):e252-e253. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004112.
10
Emergency Department to ICU Time Is Associated With Hospital Mortality: A Registry Analysis of 14,788 Patients From Six University Hospitals in The Netherlands.急诊到 ICU 时间与住院死亡率相关:来自荷兰六所大学医院的 14788 例患者的注册分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1564-1571. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003957.