• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非 ST 段抬高院外心搏骤停(ARREST)患者行紧急转运至心搏骤停中心:一项英国前瞻性、多中心、平行、随机临床试验。

Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST-elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ARREST): a UK prospective, multicentre, parallel, randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Cardiovascular Department, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1329-1337. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01351-X. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01351-X
PMID:37647928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has called for a randomised trial of delivery to a cardiac arrest centre. We aimed to assess whether expedited delivery to a cardiac arrest centre compared with current standard of care following resuscitated cardiac arrest reduces deaths.

METHODS

ARREST is a prospective, parallel, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with return of spontaneous circulation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST elevation were randomly assigned (1:1) at the scene of their cardiac arrest by London Ambulance Service staff using a secure online randomisation system to expedited delivery to the cardiac catheter laboratory at one of seven cardiac arrest centres or standard of care with delivery to the geographically closest emergency department at one of 32 hospitals in London, UK. Masking of the ambulance staff who delivered the interventions and those reporting treatment outcomes in hospital was not possible. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days, analysed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population excluding those with unknown mortality status. Safety outcomes were analysed in the ITT population. The trial was prospectively registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Registry, 96585404.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 15, 2018, and Dec 1, 2022, 862 patients were enrolled, of whom 431 (50%) were randomly assigned to a cardiac arrest centre and 431 (50%) to standard care. 20 participants withdrew from the cardiac arrest centre group and 19 from the standard care group, due to lack of consent or unknown mortality status, leaving 411 participants in the cardiac arrest centre group and 412 in the standard care group for the primary analysis. Of 822 participants for whom data were available, 560 (68%) were male and 262 (32%) were female. The primary endpoint of 30-day mortality occurred in 258 (63%) of 411 participants in the cardiac arrest centre group and in 258 (63%) of 412 in the standard care group (unadjusted risk ratio for survival 1·00, 95% CI 0·90-1·11; p=0·96). Eight (2%) of 414 patients in the cardiac arrest centre group and three (1%) of 413 in the standard care group had serious adverse events, none of which were deemed related to the trial intervention.

INTERPRETATION

In adult patients without ST elevation, transfer to a cardiac arrest centre following resuscitated cardiac arrest in the community did not reduce deaths.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation.

摘要

背景

国际复苏联络委员会呼吁进行一项将分娩送往心脏骤停中心的随机试验。我们旨在评估与复苏后心脏骤停的当前标准护理相比,将分娩送往心脏骤停中心是否会降低死亡率。

方法

ARREST 是一项前瞻性、平行、多中心、开放标签、随机优势试验。患有院外心脏骤停后无 ST 段抬高的自主循环恢复的患者(年龄≥18 岁)由伦敦救护服务人员在心脏骤停现场通过安全的在线随机化系统随机分配(1:1)至七个心脏骤停中心之一的心脏导管实验室进行紧急分娩,或在英国伦敦的 32 家医院之一的地理上最近的急诊科进行标准护理。无法对提供干预措施的救护人员进行掩蔽,也无法对在医院报告治疗结果的人员进行掩蔽。主要结局是 30 天时的全因死亡率,在排除死亡率状态未知的患者后,按意向治疗人群(ITT)进行分析。安全性结局在 ITT 人群中进行分析。该试验在国际标准随机对照试验注册处(International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Registry)进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为 96585404。

结果

在 2018 年 1 月 15 日至 2022 年 12 月 1 日期间,纳入了 862 名患者,其中 431 名(50%)被随机分配至心脏骤停中心,431 名(50%)分配至标准护理组。20 名参与者退出了心脏骤停中心组,19 名退出了标准护理组,原因是缺乏同意或死亡率状态未知,因此,心脏骤停中心组有 411 名参与者,标准护理组有 412 名参与者进行主要分析。在可获得数据的 822 名参与者中,560 名(68%)为男性,262 名(32%)为女性。心脏骤停中心组有 258 名(63%)和标准护理组有 258 名(63%)参与者发生了 30 天死亡率的主要终点(校正后生存风险比为 1.00,95%CI 0.90-1.11;p=0.96)。心脏骤停中心组有 414 名患者中的 8 名(2%)和标准护理组有 413 名患者中的 3 名(1%)发生了严重不良事件,但均与试验干预无关。

解释

在无 ST 段抬高的成年患者中,社区复苏后将患者送往心脏骤停中心并未降低死亡率。

资金来源

英国心脏基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/49fc6ce01bad/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/0badd1d4d12f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/8322b9900c20/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/49fc6ce01bad/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/0badd1d4d12f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/8322b9900c20/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d89/10877072/49fc6ce01bad/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST-elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ARREST): a UK prospective, multicentre, parallel, randomised clinical trial.非 ST 段抬高院外心搏骤停(ARREST)患者行紧急转运至心搏骤停中心:一项英国前瞻性、多中心、平行、随机临床试验。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1329-1337. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01351-X. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
2
A Randomised tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST pilot randomised trial.非 ST 段抬高型室颤院外心脏骤停患者行心脏骤停中心快速转运的随机试验:ARREST 试验 pilot 随机试验。
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
3
Rationale and design of: A Randomized tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest center for non-ST elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST randomized controlled trial.背景和设计:一项针对非 ST 段抬高院外心脏骤停患者进行紧急转移至心脏骤停中心的随机试验:ARREST 随机对照试验。
Am Heart J. 2018 Oct;204:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.针对院外心脏骤停和难治性心室颤动患者的高级再灌注策略(ARREST):一项 2 期、单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1807-1816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32338-2. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
5
Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.机械与手动胸外按压在院外心脏骤停中的应用(PARAMEDIC):一项实用的、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):947-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
6
Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation.院外心脏骤停时机械压迫装置的院前随机评估(PARAMEDIC):一项实用的整群随机试验及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(11):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta21110.
7
Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial.院外心脏骤停时标准心肺复苏与增加胸内负压的主动按压-减压心肺复苏的随机对照试验
Lancet. 2011 Jan 22;377(9762):301-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62103-4.
8
Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation in the initial airway management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the AIRWAYS-2 cluster RCT.院外心脏骤停初始气道管理中声门上气道装置与气管插管的比较:AIRWAYS-2 整群随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Apr;26(21):1-158. doi: 10.3310/VHOH9034.
9
Community first responders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults and children.成人及儿童院外心脏骤停的社区第一响应者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7(7):CD012764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012764.pub2.
10
Cardiac arrest centres for patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest: A systematic review.非创伤性心搏骤停患者的心脏骤停中心:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2024 Oct;203:110387. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110387. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher versus lower mean arterial blood pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (MAP-CARE): A protocol for a randomized clinical trial.心脏骤停与复苏后较高与较低平均动脉血压(MAP-CARE):一项随机临床试验方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70040. doi: 10.1111/aas.70040.
2
CT imaging in post-resuscitation care of non-traumatic resuscitation room patients in German hospitals.德国医院非创伤性复苏室患者复苏后护理中的CT成像
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01216-w.
3
Right atrium area is associated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a single-center cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Cardiac Arrest Centers on the Survival of Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心脏骤停中心对非创伤性院外心脏骤停患者生存的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jan 4;11(1):e023806. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023806. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
2
Systems of Care for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的照护系统:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 16;144(20):e310-e327. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001025. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
3
Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation.
右心房面积与院外心脏骤停后的生存率相关:一项单中心队列研究。
Echo Res Pract. 2025 Apr 14;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s44156-025-00072-5.
4
Regional variation in temperature control after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后体温控制的区域差异。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Oct 9;20:100794. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100794. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
The Latest in Resuscitation Research: Highlights From the 2023 American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium.复苏研究的最新进展:2023年美国心脏协会复苏科学研讨会亮点
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e037295. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037295. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
6
Cardiac arrest: Pre-hospital strategies to facilitate successful resuscitation and improve recovery rates.心脏骤停:促进成功复苏及提高复苏率的院前策略
World J Cardiol. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):100782. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i1.100782.
7
Prehospital critical care beyond advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.院外心脏骤停的高级生命支持之外的院前重症护理:一项系统综述。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Dec 12;21:100803. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100803. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Seeking a Treatable Cause of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during and after Resuscitation.寻找院外心脏骤停复苏期间及之后的可治疗病因。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 28;13(19):5804. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195804.
9
Management of Patients With Cardiac Arrest Requiring Interfacility Transport: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.需要院内转运的心跳骤停患者的管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):e316-e327. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001282. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
10
2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes : Statement of endorsement by the NVVC.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南:荷兰心血管病协会认可声明
Neth Heart J. 2024 Oct;32(10):338-345. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01896-2. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
院外心脏骤停后无 ST 段抬高患者的血管造影术。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 30;385(27):2544-2553. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101909. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
4
Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.院外心脏骤停后低温与常温。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2283-2294. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100591.
5
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in London during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间伦敦的院外心脏骤停情况。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar;5:100066. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100066. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
6
The cardiac arrest centre for the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest due to presumed cardiac cause - aims, function and structure: Position paper of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology (AVCV), European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Resuscitation Council (ERC), European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).心脏骤停中心治疗疑似心源性心脏骤停-目的、功能和结构:欧洲心脏病学会急性心血管护理协会(AVCV)、欧洲经皮冠状动脉介入治疗协会(EAPCI)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)、欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)、欧洲急诊医学学会(EUSEM)和欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)的立场文件。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Nov;9(4_suppl):S193-S202. doi: 10.1177/2048872620963492.
7
COSCA (Core Outcome Set for Cardiac Arrest) in Adults: An Advisory Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.《成人心脏骤停 COCSS(核心结局集合):复苏国际联络委员会的咨询声明》。
Circulation. 2018 May 29;137(22):e783-e801. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000562. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
The chain of survival: Not all links are equal.生存链:并非所有环节都同等重要。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:80-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
9
A Randomised tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST pilot randomised trial.非 ST 段抬高型室颤院外心脏骤停患者行心脏骤停中心快速转运的随机试验:ARREST 试验 pilot 随机试验。
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
10
Challenging Issues in Clinical Trial Design: Part 4 of a 4-Part Series on Statistics for Clinical Trials.临床试验设计中的挑战问题:临床试验统计学系列文章的第 4 部分(共 4 部分)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 29;66(25):2886-2898. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.051.