• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童即使看到他人的结果也能在阈限公共物品博弈中维持合作。

Children Sustain Cooperation in a Threshold Public-Goods Game Even When Seeing Others' Outcomes.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth.

Faculty of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2024 Oct;35(10):1094-1107. doi: 10.1177/09567976241267854. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1177/09567976241267854
PMID:39158941
Abstract

Many societal challenges are threshold dilemmas requiring people to cooperate to reach a threshold before group benefits can be reaped. Yet receiving feedback about others' outcomes relative to one's own () can undermine cooperation by focusing group members' attention on outperforming each other. We investigated the impact of relative feedback compared to (only seeing one's own outcome) on cooperation in children from Germany and India (6- to 10-year-olds, = 240). Using a threshold public-goods game with real water as a resource, we show that, although feedback had an effect, most groups sustained cooperation at high levels in both feedback conditions until the end of the game. Analyses of children's communication (14,374 codable utterances) revealed more references to social comparisons and more verbal efforts to coordinate in the relative-feedback condition. Thresholds can mitigate the most adverse effects of social comparisons by focusing attention on a common goal.

摘要

许多社会挑战都是门槛困境,需要人们合作达到门槛,才能获得群体利益。然而,收到关于他人相对于自己的结果的反馈()可能会破坏合作,因为它将群体成员的注意力集中在相互超越上。我们调查了相对反馈(只看到自己的结果)与(仅看到自己的结果)对来自德国和印度的儿童(6 至 10 岁,n=240)合作的影响。我们使用真实水作为资源的门槛公共物品游戏表明,尽管反馈有影响,但在两种反馈条件下,大多数群体都在游戏结束前保持高水平的合作。对儿童沟通的分析(14374 个可编码话语)表明,在相对反馈条件下,更多地提到了社会比较,并且更多地通过语言努力协调。通过将注意力集中在一个共同目标上,门槛可以减轻社会比较最不利的影响。

相似文献

1
Children Sustain Cooperation in a Threshold Public-Goods Game Even When Seeing Others' Outcomes.儿童即使看到他人的结果也能在阈限公共物品博弈中维持合作。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Oct;35(10):1094-1107. doi: 10.1177/09567976241267854. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Adult criticism and vigilance diminish free riding by children in a social dilemma.成人的批评和警惕会减少儿童在社会困境中的搭便车行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Mar;167:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
4
Generalized Social Dilemmas: The Evolution of Cooperation in Populations with Variable Group Size.广义社会困境:变群组大小的群体中合作的演化。
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Nov;81(11):4643-4674. doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-00545-1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
5
Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games.社会和经济激励对基于实际努力的公共物品博弈中合作的非对称影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249217. eCollection 2021.
6
Cooperation and social organization depend on weighing private and public reputations.合作和社会组织依赖于权衡私人和公共声誉。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67080-z.
7
Intuitive cooperators: Time pressure increases children's cooperative decisions in a modified public goods game.直觉合作者:时间压力会增加儿童在改良公共物品博弈中的合作决策。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jul;26(4):e13344. doi: 10.1111/desc.13344. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Efficacy = endowment x efficiency: revisiting efficacy and endowment effects in a public goods dilemma.功效 = 禀赋 × 效率:重新审视公共物品困境中的功效与禀赋效应
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):155-69. doi: 10.1037/a0012879.
9
Does nonbinding commitment promote children's cooperation in a social dilemma?无约束力的承诺能否促进儿童在社会困境中的合作?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Dec;200:104947. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104947. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies.异质社会中的社会商品困境。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):819-831. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0881-2. Epub 2020 May 25.