Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1044-1051. doi: 10.1177/19322968241267774. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
In this multicenter study, performance of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system was evaluated.
Adult participants with diabetes were included in the study. They each wore three sensors of the CGM system on the upper arms for up to 14 days. During four in-clinic visits, frequent comparison measurements with capillary blood glucose (BG) samples were performed. The primary endpoint was the 20/20 agreement rate (AR): the percentage of CGM readings within ±20 mg/dL (at BG values <100 mg/dL) or ±20% (at BG values ≥100 mg/dL) of the comparator. Further evaluations included mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and 20/20 AR in different BG ranges and across the wear time.
Data from 48 participants and 139 sensors were analyzed. During in-clinic sessions the 20/20 AR was 90.5% and the MARD was 9.2%. For BG ranges <70, 70-180, and >180 mg/dL, 20/20 AR was 94.3%, 89.0%, and 92.5%, respectively. At the beginning, middle, and end of sensor wear time, 20/20 AR was 92.8%, 91.5%, and 85.9%, respectively. The 14-day survival probability was 82.4%. Pain and bleeding after sensor insertion were within the expected range. Based on the study outcome, the use of the device is regarded as safe.
The system showed a good performance compared to capillary BG measurements. This level of accuracy could be shown over the entire measurement range, especially in the low glycemic range, and the whole wear time of the sensors. The results of this study are supporting a non-adjunctive use of the device.
本研究旨在评估一种新型连续血糖监测(CGM)系统的性能。
研究纳入成年糖尿病患者,每位患者在上臂佩戴三个 CGM 系统传感器,最长佩戴 14 天。在 4 次门诊就诊期间,频繁与毛细血管血糖(BG)样本进行比较测量。主要终点是 20/20 符合率(AR):CGM 读数与参考值在 ±20mg/dL(BG<100mg/dL 时)或 ±20%(BG≥100mg/dL 时)以内的百分比。进一步的评估包括不同 BG 范围和佩戴时间内的平均绝对相对差异(MARD)和 20/20 AR。
分析了 48 名参与者和 139 个传感器的数据。在门诊就诊期间,20/20 AR 为 90.5%,MARD 为 9.2%。对于 BG<70、70-180 和>180mg/dL 的范围,20/20 AR 分别为 94.3%、89.0%和 92.5%。在传感器佩戴时间的开始、中间和结束时,20/20 AR 分别为 92.8%、91.5%和 85.9%。传感器的 14 天存活率为 82.4%。传感器插入后的疼痛和出血均处于预期范围内。根据研究结果,该设备的使用被认为是安全的。
与毛细血管 BG 测量相比,该系统显示出良好的性能。这种精度水平可以在整个测量范围内显示,尤其是在低血糖范围内和整个传感器佩戴时间内。本研究结果支持该设备的非辅助使用。