Link Manuela, Eichenlaub Manuel, Waldenmaier Delia, Wehrstedt Stephanie, Pleus Stefan, Jendrike Nina, Öter Sükrü, Haug Cornelia, Hossmann Stefanie, Rothenbühler Martina, Brandt Derek, Freckmann Guido
Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Diabetes Center Berne, Bern, Switzerland.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 24:19322968251317526. doi: 10.1177/19322968251317526.
In continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system performance studies, it is common to implement specific procedures for manipulating the participants' blood glucose (BG) levels during the collection of comparator BG measurements. Recently, such a procedure was proposed by a group of experts, and this study assessed its ability to produce combinations of BG levels and rates of change (RoCs) with certain characteristics.
During three separate in-clinic sessions conducted over 15 days, capillary BG measurements were carried out every 15 minutes for 7 hours. Simultaneously, the participants' BG levels were manipulated by controlling food intake and insulin administration to induce transient hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Subsequently, the combinations of BG levels and RoCs were categorized into dynamic glucose regions distinguishing between rapidly increasing BG levels (Alert high), hyperglycemia (BG high), rapidly falling BG levels (Alert low), and hypoglycemia (BG low).
A total of 24 adult participants with type 1 diabetes were included. Capillary BG-RoC combinations showed 7.5% in the Alert high region, 13.3% in the BG high region, 9.8% in the Alert low region, and 11.0% in the BG low region. No adverse events related to the glucose manipulation procedure were documented.
As recommended by the experts, the percentage of data points in regions was ≥7.5%, demonstrating the procedure's feasibility. However, given that the recommendation for the alert high region was only barely achieved, we suggest optimizations to the procedure and definition of dynamic glucose regions to facilitate the procedures' adoption in standardized CGM performance evaluations.
在连续血糖监测(CGM)系统性能研究中,在收集对照血糖测量值期间实施特定程序来操纵参与者的血糖(BG)水平是很常见的。最近,一组专家提出了这样一种程序,本研究评估了其产生具有特定特征的血糖水平和变化率(RoC)组合的能力。
在15天内进行的三次单独的门诊过程中,每15分钟进行一次毛细血管血糖测量,持续7小时。同时,通过控制食物摄入量和胰岛素给药来操纵参与者的血糖水平,以诱导短暂性高血糖和低血糖。随后,将血糖水平和RoC的组合分类到动态血糖区域,区分快速升高的血糖水平(警戒高)、高血糖(血糖高)、快速下降的血糖水平(警戒低)和低血糖(血糖低)。
共纳入24名1型糖尿病成年参与者。毛细血管血糖-RoC组合在警戒高区域占7.5%,在血糖高区域占13.3%,在警戒低区域占9.8%,在血糖低区域占11.0%。未记录到与血糖操纵程序相关的不良事件。
正如专家所建议的,各区域数据点的百分比≥7.5%,证明了该程序的可行性。然而,鉴于警戒高区域的建议仅勉强实现,我们建议对该程序和动态血糖区域的定义进行优化,以促进该程序在标准化CGM性能评估中的采用。