Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
TB Modelling Group, TB Centre and Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Oct;12(10):e1629-e1637. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00284-5. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
A pan-tuberculosis regimen that could be initiated without knowledge of drug susceptibility has been proposed as an objective of tuberculosis regimen development. We modelled the health and economic benefits of such a regimen and analysed which of its features contribute most to impact and savings.
We constructed a mathematical model of tuberculosis treatment parameterised with data from the published literature specific to three countries with a high tuberculosis burden (India, the Philippines, and South Africa). Our model simulated cohorts of newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients, including drug susceptibility testing if performed, regimen assignment, discontinuation, adherence, costs, and resulting outcomes of durable cure (microbiological cure without relapse), need for retreatment, or death. We compared a pan-tuberculosis regimen meeting the WHO 2023 target regimen profile against the standard of care of separate rifampicin-susceptible and rifampicin-resistant regimens. We estimated incremental cures; averted deaths, secondary cases, and costs; and prices below which a pan-tuberculosis regimen would be cost saving. We also assessed scenarios intended to describe which mechanisms of benefit from a pan-tuberculosis regimen (including improved characteristics compared with the current rifampicin-susceptible and rifampicin-resistant regimens and improved regimen assignment and retention in care for patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis) would be most impactful. Results are presented as a range of means across countries with the most extreme 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) from the three UI ranges.
Compared with the standard of care, a pan-tuberculosis regimen could increase the proportion of patients durably cured after an initial treatment attempt from 69-71% (95% UI 57-80) to 75-76% (68-83), preventing 30-32% of the deaths (20-43) and 17-20% of the transmission (9-29) that occur after initial tuberculosis diagnosis. Considering savings to the health system and patients during and after the initial treatment attempt, the regimen could reduce non-drug costs by 32-42% (22-49) and would be cost saving at prices below US$170-340 (130-510). A rifamycin-containing regimen that otherwise met pan-tuberculosis targets yielded only slightly less impact, indicating that most of the benefits from a pan-tuberculosis regimen resulted from its improvements upon the rifampicin-susceptible standard of care. Eliminating non-adherence and treatment discontinuation, for example via a long-acting injectable regimen, increased health impact and savings.
In countries with a high tuberculosis burden, a shorter, highly efficacious, safe, and tolerable regimen to treat all tuberculosis could yield substantial health improvements and savings.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
一种能够在不了解药物敏感性的情况下启动的泛结核病方案被提议作为结核病方案开发的目标。我们对这种方案的健康和经济效益进行了建模,并分析了其哪些特征对影响和节省贡献最大。
我们构建了一个结核病治疗的数学模型,该模型使用了来自三个结核病负担高的国家(印度、菲律宾和南非)的已发表文献中的数据进行参数化。我们的模型模拟了新诊断为结核病的患者队列,包括如果进行药物敏感性测试、方案分配、停药、依从性、成本以及持久治愈(无复发的微生物学治愈)、需要重新治疗或死亡的结果。我们将符合世卫组织 2023 年目标方案特征的泛结核病方案与单独的利福平敏感和利福平耐药方案的标准护理进行了比较。我们估计了增量治愈;避免的死亡、继发病例和成本;以及低于该价格的泛结核病方案将具有成本效益。我们还评估了旨在描述泛结核病方案(包括与当前利福平敏感和利福平耐药方案相比的改进特征,以及对利福平耐药结核病患者的方案分配和护理保留的改进)的受益机制中哪些机制最具影响力的情况。结果以各国平均值表示,最极端的 95%不确定性区间(UI)来自三个 UI 范围中的最极端范围。
与标准护理相比,泛结核病方案可将初始治疗尝试后持久治愈的患者比例从 69-71%(95%UI 57-80)提高到 75-76%(68-83),从而预防 30-32%(20-43)的死亡和 17-20%(9-29)的传播。考虑到初始治疗期间和之后对卫生系统和患者的节省,该方案可将非药物成本降低 32-42%(22-49),并且在价格低于 170-340 美元(130-510 美元)时具有成本效益。否则符合泛结核病目标的含有利福霉素的方案仅产生略小的影响,表明泛结核病方案的大部分益处来自于其对利福平敏感的标准护理的改进。例如,通过长效注射剂方案消除非依从性和治疗中断,可以提高健康影响和节省。
在结核病负担高的国家,一种更短、高效、安全且耐受性良好的治疗所有结核病的方案可以带来显著的健康改善和节省。
比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。