• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大腿佩戴加速度计评估活动分类的准确性:ActiPASS 在学龄儿童中的验证研究。

Assessing the Accuracy of Activity Classification Using Thigh-Worn Accelerometry: A Validation Study of ActiPASS in School-Aged Children.

机构信息

Human Potential Centre, School of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Institute for Movement Therapy and Movement-Oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2024 Aug 19;21(10):1092-1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0259. Print 2024 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2024-0259
PMID:39159934
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ActiPASS software was developed from the open-source Acti4 activity classification algorithm for thigh-worn accelerometry. However, the original algorithm has not been validated in children or compared with a child-specific set of algorithm thresholds. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of ActiPASS in classifying activity types in children using 2 published sets of Acti4 thresholds.

METHODS

Laboratory and free-living data from 2 previous studies were used. The laboratory condition included 41 school-aged children (11.0 [4.8] y; 46.5% male), and the free-living condition included 15 children (10.0 [2.6] y; 66.6% male). Participants wore a single accelerometer on the dominant thigh, and annotated video recordings were used as a reference. Postures and activity types were classified with ActiPASS using the original adult thresholds and a child-specific set of thresholds.

RESULTS

Using the original adult thresholds, the mean balanced accuracy (95% CI) for the laboratory condition ranged from 0.62 (0.56-0.67) for lying to 0.97 (0.94-0.99) for running. For the free-living condition, accuracy ranged from 0.61 (0.48-0.75) for lying to 0.96 (0.92-0.99) for cycling. Mean balanced accuracy for overall sedentary behavior (sitting and lying) was ≥0.97 (0.95-0.99) across all thresholds and conditions. No meaningful differences were found between the 2 sets of thresholds, except for superior balanced accuracy of the adult thresholds for walking under laboratory conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that ActiPASS can accurately classify different basic types of physical activity and sedentary behavior in children using thigh-worn accelerometer data.

摘要

背景

ActiPASS 软件是从 thigh-worn 加速度计的开源 Acti4 活动分类算法开发而来的。然而,原始算法尚未在儿童中进行验证,也未与特定于儿童的算法阈值集进行比较。本研究旨在使用 2 套已发表的 Acti4 阈值来评估 ActiPASS 在分类儿童活动类型方面的准确性。

方法

使用了两项先前研究的实验室和自由生活数据。实验室条件包括 41 名学龄儿童(11.0[4.8]岁;46.5%为男性),自由生活条件包括 15 名儿童(10.0[2.6]岁;66.6%为男性)。参与者在优势大腿上佩戴单个加速度计,并使用视频记录进行注释作为参考。使用 ActiPASS 和原始成人阈值以及特定于儿童的阈值集对姿势和活动类型进行分类。

结果

使用原始成人阈值,实验室条件下的平均平衡准确率(95%CI)从卧位的 0.62(0.56-0.67)到跑步的 0.97(0.94-0.99)。对于自由生活条件,准确性范围从卧位的 0.61(0.48-0.75)到骑自行车的 0.96(0.92-0.99)。所有阈值和条件下,整体静坐行为(坐姿和卧位)的平均平衡准确率均≥0.97(0.95-0.99)。两种阈值之间没有发现有意义的差异,除了实验室条件下成人阈值对步行的平衡准确率更高。

结论

结果表明,ActiPASS 可以使用 thigh-worn 加速度计数据准确地分类儿童的不同基本类型的体力活动和静坐行为。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Accuracy of Activity Classification Using Thigh-Worn Accelerometry: A Validation Study of ActiPASS in School-Aged Children.使用大腿佩戴加速度计评估活动分类的准确性:ActiPASS 在学龄儿童中的验证研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Aug 19;21(10):1092-1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0259. Print 2024 Oct 1.
2
Thigh-worn accelerometry: a comparative study of two no-code classification methods for identifying physical activity types.大腿佩戴加速度计:两种无代码分类方法识别身体活动类型的比较研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 17;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01627-1.
3
Reliable recognition of lying, sitting, and standing with a hip-worn accelerometer.使用佩戴在髋部的加速度计可靠地识别躺、坐和站。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Mar;28(3):1092-1102. doi: 10.1111/sms.13017. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Differentiating Sitting and Lying Using a Thigh-Worn Accelerometer.使用大腿佩戴式加速度计区分坐姿和躺姿
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Apr;48(4):742-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000804.
5
Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands: a proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS).三种不同 thigh-worn 加速度计品牌的身体活动估计值比较:前瞻性体力活动、坐姿和睡眠研究联盟(ProPASS)的概念验证。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 16;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0835-0.
6
Validity of a Non-Proprietary Algorithm for Identifying Lying Down Using Raw Data from Thigh-Worn Triaxial Accelerometers.使用大腿佩戴三轴加速度计的原始数据识别仰卧的非专利算法的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;21(3):904. doi: 10.3390/s21030904.
7
Accuracy of Posture Allocation Algorithms for Thigh- and Waist-Worn Accelerometers.用于大腿和腰部佩戴式加速度计的姿势分配算法的准确性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1085-90. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000865.
8
Ability of thigh-worn ActiGraph and activPAL monitors to classify posture and motion.大腿佩戴式ActiGraph和activPAL监测仪对姿势和运动进行分类的能力。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):952-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000497.
9
Composite activity type and stride-specific energy expenditure estimation model for thigh-worn accelerometry.用于大腿佩戴加速度计的综合活动类型和步幅特异性能量消耗估计模型。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 10;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01646-y.
10
Posture and movement classification: the comparison of tri-axial accelerometer numbers and anatomical placement.姿势与运动分类:三轴加速度计数量及解剖学放置的比较
J Biomech Eng. 2014 May;136(5):051003. doi: 10.1115/1.4026230.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the ActiMotus Software to Accurately Classify Postures and Movements in Children Aged 3-14.评估 ActiMotus 软件以准确分类 3-14 岁儿童的姿势和运动
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;24(20):6705. doi: 10.3390/s24206705.