Suppr超能文献

使用大腿佩戴三轴加速度计的原始数据识别仰卧的非专利算法的有效性。

Validity of a Non-Proprietary Algorithm for Identifying Lying Down Using Raw Data from Thigh-Worn Triaxial Accelerometers.

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

Spenshult Research and Development Center, 302 74 Halmstad, Sweden.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;21(3):904. doi: 10.3390/s21030904.

Abstract

Body postural allocation during daily life is important for health, and can be assessed with thigh-worn accelerometers. An algorithm based on sedentary bouts from the proprietary ActivePAL software can detect lying down from a single thigh-worn accelerometer using rotations of the thigh. However, it is not usable across brands of accelerometers. This algorithm has the potential to be refined. : To refine and assess the validity of an algorithm to detect lying down from raw data of thigh-worn accelerometers. Axivity-AX3 accelerometers were placed on the thigh and upper back (reference) on adults in a development dataset (n = 50) and a validation dataset (n = 47) for 7 days. Sedentary time from the open Acti4-algorithm was used as input to the algorithm. In addition to the thigh-rotation criterion in the existing algorithm, two criteria based on standard deviation of acceleration and a time duration criterion of sedentary bouts were added. The mean difference (95% agreement-limits) between the total identified lying time/day, between the refined algorithm and the reference was +2.9 (-135,141) min in the development dataset and +6.5 (-145,159) min in the validation dataset. The refined algorithm can be used to estimate lying time in studies using different accelerometer brands.

摘要

日常生活中的身体姿势分配对健康很重要,可以通过大腿佩戴的加速度计进行评估。一种基于专有 ActivePAL 软件中久坐小睡的算法可以通过大腿的旋转来从单个大腿佩戴的加速度计中检测到躺下。然而,它不能在不同品牌的加速度计上使用。该算法具有改进的潜力。目的:改进和评估一种从大腿佩戴的加速度计原始数据中检测躺下的算法,并评估其有效性。在开发数据集(n=50)和验证数据集(n=47)中,将 Axivity-AX3 加速度计放置在大腿和上背部(参考)上,成年人佩戴 7 天。将开放 Acti4 算法中的久坐时间作为输入提供给算法。除了现有算法中的大腿旋转标准外,还添加了两个基于加速度标准差的标准和一个久坐小睡持续时间标准。在开发数据集和验证数据集中,总识别卧床时间/天之间的平均差异(95%一致性限制)在精炼算法和参考值之间分别为+2.9(-135,141)min 和+6.5(-145,159)min。该精炼算法可用于使用不同加速度计品牌进行的研究中估计卧床时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b72b/7866264/498e5af4e064/sensors-21-00904-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验