• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 ActiMotus 软件以准确分类 3-14 岁儿童的姿势和运动

Evaluation of the ActiMotus Software to Accurately Classify Postures and Movements in Children Aged 3-14.

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.

ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, Brisbane, ACT 2609, Australia.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;24(20):6705. doi: 10.3390/s24206705.

DOI:10.3390/s24206705
PMID:39460185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11510827/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

ActiMotus, a thigh-accelerometer-based software used for the classification of postures and movements (PaMs), has shown high accuracy among adults and school-aged children; however, its accuracy among younger children and potential differences between sexes are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ActiMotus to measure PaMs among children between 3 and 14 years and to assess if this was influenced by the sex or age of children.

METHOD

Forty-eight children attended a structured ~1-hour data collection session at a laboratory. Thigh acceleration was measured using a SENS accelerometer, which was classified into nine PaMs using the ActiMotus software. Human-coded video recordings of the session provided the ground truth.

RESULTS

Based on both F1 scores and balanced accuracy, the highest levels of accuracy were found for lying, sitting, and standing (63.2-88.2%). For walking and running, accuracy measures ranged from 48.0 to 85.8%. The lowest accuracy was observed for classifying stair climbing. We found a higher accuracy for stair climbing among girls compared to boys and for older compared to younger age groups for walking, running, and stair climbing.

CONCLUSIONS

ActiMotus could accurately detect lying, sitting, and standing among children. The software could be improved for classifying walking, running, and stair climbing, particularly among younger children.

摘要

背景

ActiMotus 是一款基于大腿加速计的软件,用于对姿势和动作(PaMs)进行分类,在成年人和学龄儿童中已显示出较高的准确性;然而,其在幼儿中的准确性以及性别差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 ActiMotus 测量 3 至 14 岁儿童 PaMs 的准确性,并评估其是否受到儿童性别或年龄的影响。

方法

48 名儿童在实验室参加了一个约 1 小时的结构化数据采集会议。使用 SENS 加速计测量大腿加速度,使用 ActiMotus 软件将其分类为九种 PaMs。会议的人工编码视频记录提供了真实数据。

结果

基于 F1 评分和平衡准确性,发现躺着、坐着和站立的准确性最高(63.2-88.2%)。对于行走和跑步,准确性测量范围为 48.0 到 85.8%。分类爬楼梯的准确性最低。我们发现女孩在爬楼梯方面的准确性高于男孩,而在行走、跑步和爬楼梯方面,年龄较大的儿童的准确性高于年龄较小的儿童。

结论

ActiMotus 可以准确地检测儿童的躺着、坐着和站立姿势。该软件可以针对行走、跑步和爬楼梯进行改进,特别是针对年龄较小的儿童。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/afddd2437e79/sensors-24-06705-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/ded7dc20afc8/sensors-24-06705-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/46caec9c0828/sensors-24-06705-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/afddd2437e79/sensors-24-06705-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/ded7dc20afc8/sensors-24-06705-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/46caec9c0828/sensors-24-06705-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ffb/11510827/afddd2437e79/sensors-24-06705-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the ActiMotus Software to Accurately Classify Postures and Movements in Children Aged 3-14.评估 ActiMotus 软件以准确分类 3-14 岁儿童的姿势和运动
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;24(20):6705. doi: 10.3390/s24206705.
2
Thigh-worn accelerometry: a comparative study of two no-code classification methods for identifying physical activity types.大腿佩戴加速度计:两种无代码分类方法识别身体活动类型的比较研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 17;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01627-1.
3
Assessing the Accuracy of Activity Classification Using Thigh-Worn Accelerometry: A Validation Study of ActiPASS in School-Aged Children.使用大腿佩戴加速度计评估活动分类的准确性:ActiPASS 在学龄儿童中的验证研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Aug 19;21(10):1092-1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0259. Print 2024 Oct 1.
4
Relationship of device measured physical activity type and posture with cardiometabolic health markers: pooled dose-response associations from the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep Consortium.设备测量的身体活动类型和姿势与心脏代谢健康标志物的关系:前瞻性身体活动、坐姿和睡眠联盟的汇总剂量反应关联。
Diabetologia. 2024 Jun;67(6):1051-1065. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06090-y. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Reliable recognition of lying, sitting, and standing with a hip-worn accelerometer.使用佩戴在髋部的加速度计可靠地识别躺、坐和站。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Mar;28(3):1092-1102. doi: 10.1111/sms.13017. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Detection of body postures and movements in ambulatory adults with cerebral palsy: a novel and valid measure of physical behaviour.检测脑瘫成人的体位和运动:一种新颖且有效的身体行为测量方法。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Oct 29;16(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0594-9.
7
Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.GT3X ActiGraph 在儿童中的验证及与 GT1M ActiGraph 的比较。
J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Jan;16(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Posture and movement classification: the comparison of tri-axial accelerometer numbers and anatomical placement.姿势与运动分类:三轴加速度计数量及解剖学放置的比较
J Biomech Eng. 2014 May;136(5):051003. doi: 10.1115/1.4026230.
9
Hip and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Analysis for Toddler Activities.婴幼儿活动的髋部和腕部佩戴加速度计数据的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 21;16(14):2598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142598.
10
Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands: a proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS).三种不同 thigh-worn 加速度计品牌的身体活动估计值比较:前瞻性体力活动、坐姿和睡眠研究联盟(ProPASS)的概念验证。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 16;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0835-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Accuracy of Activity Classification Using Thigh-Worn Accelerometry: A Validation Study of ActiPASS in School-Aged Children.使用大腿佩戴加速度计评估活动分类的准确性:ActiPASS 在学龄儿童中的验证研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Aug 19;21(10):1092-1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0259. Print 2024 Oct 1.
2
Are we ready for wearable-based global physical activity surveillance?我们是否准备好进行基于可穿戴设备的全球身体活动监测?
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Mar 21;58(7):356-358. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106780.
3
Objective Measurement of Posture and Movement in Young Children Using Wearable Sensors and Customised Mathematical Approaches: A Systematic Review.
使用可穿戴传感器和定制数学方法客观测量幼儿姿势和运动:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 6;23(24):9661. doi: 10.3390/s23249661.
4
A systematic review of the clustering and correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior among boys and girls.一项针对男孩和女孩身体活动和久坐行为聚类及其相关因素的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14869-0.
5
The Surveillance of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep: Protocol for the Development and Feasibility Evaluation of a Novel Measurement System.身体活动、久坐行为和睡眠监测:一种新型测量系统的开发与可行性评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 6;11(6):e35697. doi: 10.2196/35697.
6
Assessment of 24-hour physical behaviour in children and adolescents via wearables: a systematic review of free-living validation studies.通过可穿戴设备评估儿童和青少年的24小时身体行为:自由生活验证研究的系统评价
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 12;8(2):e001267. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001267. eCollection 2022.
7
A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children.系统评价用于评估学龄前儿童身体活动和久坐行为的测量工具的有效性、可靠性和可行性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Nov 4;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9.
8
Validity of a Non-Proprietary Algorithm for Identifying Lying Down Using Raw Data from Thigh-Worn Triaxial Accelerometers.使用大腿佩戴三轴加速度计的原始数据识别仰卧的非专利算法的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;21(3):904. doi: 10.3390/s21030904.
9
Thigh-worn accelerometry for measuring movement and posture across the 24-hour cycle: a scoping review and expert statement.用于测量24小时周期内运动和姿势的大腿佩戴式加速度计:一项范围综述和专家声明
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Dec 24;6(1):e000874. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000874. eCollection 2020.
10
Advancing the global physical activity agenda: recommendations for future research by the 2020 WHO physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines development group.推进全球身体活动议程:2020 年世卫组织身体活动和 sedentary behavior 指南制定组未来研究的建议。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01042-2.