Suppr超能文献

评估快速诊断检测的差距:来自肯尼亚国家以下一级常规卫生数据的见解。

Evaluating the gap in rapid diagnostic testing: insights from subnational Kenyan routine health data.

机构信息

Population & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya

Population & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):e081241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081241.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding diagnostic capacities is essential to addressing healthcare provision and inequity, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. This study used routine data to assess trends in rapid diagnostic test (RDT) reporting, supplies and unmet needs across national and 47 subnational (county) levels in Kenya.

METHODS

We extracted facility-level RDT data for 19 tests (2018-2020) from the Kenya District Health Information System, linked to 13 373 geocoded facilities. Data quality was assessed for reporting completeness (ratio of reports received against those expected), reporting patterns and outliers. Supply assessment covered 12 RDTs reported by at least 50% of the reporting facilities (n=5251), with missing values imputed considering reporting trends. Supply was computed by aggregating the number of tests reported per facility. Due to data limitations, demand was indirectly estimated using healthcare-seeking rates (HIV, malaria) and using population data for venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL), with unmet need computed as the difference between supply and demand.

RESULTS

Reporting completeness was under 40% across all counties, with RDT-specific reporting ranging from 9.6% to 89.6%. Malaria RDTs showed the highest annual test volumes (6.3-8.0 million) while rheumatoid factor was the lowest (0.5-0.7 million). Demand for RDTs varied from 2.5 to 11.5 million tests, with unmet needs between 1.2 and 3.5 million. Notably, malaria testing and unmet needs were highest in Turkana County, as well as the western and coastal regions. HIV testing was concentrated in the western and central regions, with decreasing unmet needs from 2018 to 2020. VDRL testing showed high volumes and unmet needs in Nairobi and select counties, with minimal yearly variation.

CONCLUSION

RDTs are crucial in enhancing diagnostic accessibility, yet their utilisation varies significantly by region. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to close testing gaps and improve data reporting completeness. Addressing these disparities is vital for equitably enhancing diagnostic services nationwide.

摘要

背景

了解诊断能力对于解决医疗保健提供和不平等问题至关重要,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究使用常规数据评估了肯尼亚国家和 47 个次国家(县)层面快速诊断检测(RDT)报告、供应和未满足需求的趋势。

方法

我们从肯尼亚地区卫生信息系统中提取了 19 项检测(2018-2020 年)的医疗机构水平数据,这些数据与 13373 个地理编码的医疗机构相关联。评估了报告的完整性(收到的报告与预期报告的比例)、报告模式和异常值,以评估数据质量。供应评估涵盖了至少 50%的报告机构报告的 12 项 RDT(n=5251),对于缺失值,考虑到报告趋势进行了插补。供应是通过汇总每个机构报告的检测数量来计算的。由于数据限制,需求是通过艾滋病毒、疟疾等医疗服务寻求率间接估计的,而性病研究实验室检测(VDRL)则使用人口数据进行估计,未满足的需求是供应和需求之间的差异。

结果

所有县的报告完整性均低于 40%,RDT 特定报告范围从 9.6%到 89.6%。疟疾 RDT 的年检测量最高(630 万至 800 万),而类风湿因子的检测量最低(50 万至 70 万)。RDT 的需求从 250 万到 1150 万不等,未满足的需求在 120 万至 350 万之间。值得注意的是,图尔卡纳县以及西部和沿海地区的疟疾检测和未满足的需求最高。艾滋病毒检测集中在西部和中部地区,2018 年至 2020 年未满足的需求逐渐减少。VDRL 检测在内罗毕和一些县的检测量和未满足的需求都很高,每年的变化很小。

结论

RDT 对增强诊断可及性至关重要,但它们的使用在不同地区存在显著差异。这些发现强调了需要采取有针对性的干预措施来缩小检测差距并提高数据报告的完整性。解决这些差异对于全国范围内公平地加强诊断服务至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c223/11337709/1e854144cd1d/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验