• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅直流电刺激对反应抑制影响的方差元分析。

Meta-analysis of variance in tDCS effects on response inhibition.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

, Office 117, Wendlingweg 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;14(1):19197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70065-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70065-7
PMID:39160262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333595/
Abstract

Deficiencies in response inhibition are associated with numerous mental health conditions, warranting innovative treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, modulates cortical excitability and has shown promise in improving response inhibition. However, tDCS effects on response inhibition often yield contradictory findings. Previous research emphasized the importance of inter-individual factors that are mostly ignored in conventional meta-analyses of mean effects. We aimed to fill this gap and promote the complementary use of the coefficient of variation ratio and standardized mean effects. The systematic literature search included single-session and sham-controlled tDCS studies utilizing stop-signal task or Go-NoGo tasks, analyzing 88 effect sizes from 53 studies. Considering the impact of inter-individual factors, we hypothesized that variances increase in the active versus sham tDCS. However, the results showed that variances between both groups did not differ. Additionally, analyzing standardized mean effects supported previous research showing an improvement in the stop-signal task but not in the Go-NoGo task following active tDCS. These findings suggest that inter-individual differences do not increase variances in response inhibition, implying that the heterogeneity cannot be attributed to higher variance in response inhibition during and after active tDCS. Furthermore, methodological considerations are crucial for tDCS efficacy.

摘要

反应抑制缺陷与许多心理健康状况有关,需要创新的治疗方法。经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 是一种非侵入性的大脑刺激技术,可调节皮质兴奋性,并已显示出改善反应抑制的潜力。然而,tDCS 对反应抑制的影响经常产生相互矛盾的发现。先前的研究强调了个体间因素的重要性,而这些因素在传统的平均效应元分析中大多被忽略。我们旨在填补这一空白,并促进变异系数比和标准化平均效应的互补使用。系统文献检索包括单次疗程和假刺激对照的 tDCS 研究,使用停止信号任务或 Go-NoGo 任务,分析了 53 项研究中的 88 个效应量。考虑到个体间因素的影响,我们假设在活跃组与假刺激组之间,方差会增加。然而,结果表明两组之间的方差没有差异。此外,分析标准化平均效应支持了先前的研究,表明在停止信号任务中,而不是在 Go-NoGo 任务中,积极 tDCS 后反应抑制得到改善。这些发现表明,个体间差异不会增加反应抑制的方差,这意味着异质性不能归因于积极 tDCS 期间和之后反应抑制的方差更高。此外,方法学考虑对于 tDCS 的疗效至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/9be4877ef91a/41598_2024_70065_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/7cfe48ffdb56/41598_2024_70065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/fd611d4e2a72/41598_2024_70065_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/254a214dd6f8/41598_2024_70065_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/9be4877ef91a/41598_2024_70065_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/7cfe48ffdb56/41598_2024_70065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/fd611d4e2a72/41598_2024_70065_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/254a214dd6f8/41598_2024_70065_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01dc/11333595/9be4877ef91a/41598_2024_70065_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of variance in tDCS effects on response inhibition.经颅直流电刺激对反应抑制影响的方差元分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;14(1):19197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70065-7.
2
Initial performance modulates the effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on inhibitory control.初始表现调节右背外侧前额叶皮质经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对抑制控制的影响。
Brain Res. 2022 Jan 1;1774:147722. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147722. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.经颅直流电刺激通过动态调制额-基底神经节网络促进反应抑制。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Inhibitory Control: Evidence from a Go/NoGo Task.小脑 tDCS 对抑制控制的影响:来自 Go/NoGo 任务的证据。
Cerebellum. 2020 Dec;19(6):788-798. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01165-z.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters.经颅直流电刺激 (tDCS) 对健康和神经精神样本背外侧前额叶的影响的系统评价和荟萃分析:刺激参数的影响。
Brain Stimul. 2016 Jul-Aug;9(4):501-17. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study.经额部阳极 tDCS 调制的抑制控制:交叉双盲假刺激 fMRI 研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194936. eCollection 2018.
7
Meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control.经颅直流电刺激对抑制控制影响的荟萃分析。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1159-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Cathodal tDCS improves task performance in participants high in Coldheartedness.阴极经颅直流电刺激可改善冷酷无情特质较高参与者的任务表现。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep;127(9):3102-3109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.274. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.经颅直流电刺激诱导的神经可塑性后效应中刺激强度影响的系统评价
J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves response inhibition more than single-target high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.在健康参与者中,多靶点高清经颅直流电刺激比单靶点高清经颅直流电刺激更能改善反应抑制能力。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 29;16:905247. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.905247. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with physical exercise can help smokers to quit smoking: a randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激联合体育锻炼有助于吸烟者戒烟:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85877-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism on prefrontal TDCS effects on aggression.COMT Val158Met 多态性对前额叶经颅直流电刺激治疗攻击行为效果的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 10;14(1):3437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53930-3.
2
Investigating the variability of prefrontal tDCS effects on working memory: An individual E-field distribution study.探究前额叶经颅直流电刺激对工作记忆影响的变异性:一项个体电场分布研究。
Cortex. 2024 Mar;172:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
3
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the Cognitive Functions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对认知功能的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Mar;35(1):126-152. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09627-x. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Subregional prefrontal cortex recruitment as a function of inhibitory demand: an fMRI metanalysis.亚区前额叶皮层的募集作为抑制需求的一个功能:一项 fMRI 的荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Sep;152:105285. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105285. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Assessing Inhibitory Control Deficits in Adult ADHD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Stop-signal Task.评估成人 ADHD 中的抑制控制缺陷:停止信号任务的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Jun;34(2):548-567. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09592-5. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
The Effect of Different Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Protocols on Drug Craving and Cognitive Functions in Methamphetamine Addicts.不同经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)方案对甲基苯丙胺成瘾者药物渴求及认知功能的影响
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2022 May-Jun;13(3):349-355. doi: 10.32598/bcn.13.2.1929.1. Epub 2022 May 1.
7
Psychopathy and response inhibition: A meta-analysis of go/no-go and stop signal task performance.精神变态与反应抑制:Go/No-Go 和停止信号任务表现的元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov;142:104868. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104868. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors.经颅直流电刺激效应的个体间差异:关于稳定、可变和情境因素贡献的叙述性综述
Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 20;12(5):522. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050522.
9
More focal, less heterogeneous? Multi-level meta-analysis of cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation effects on language and cognition.更聚焦,异质性更低?关于阴极高清经颅直流电刺激对语言和认知影响的多层次元分析。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Jul;129(7):861-878. doi: 10.1007/s00702-022-02507-3. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study.经前额 tDCS 诱导的临床和非临床人群电场强度差异:一项跨诊断、基于个体 MRI 的建模研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:103011. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103011. Epub 2022 Apr 16.