• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT预测脓毒症患者的院内全因死亡率:基于韩国脓毒症联盟数据库的情境学习

ChatGPT Predicts In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality for Sepsis: In-Context Learning with the Korean Sepsis Alliance Database.

作者信息

Oh Namkee, Cha Won Chul, Seo Jun Hyuk, Choi Seong-Gyu, Kim Jong Man, Chung Chi Ryang, Suh Gee Young, Lee Su Yeon, Oh Dong Kyu, Park Mi Hyeon, Lim Chae-Man, Ko Ryoung-Eun

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Jul;30(3):266-276. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.266. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.266
PMID:39160785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333818/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Sepsis is a leading global cause of mortality, and predicting its outcomes is vital for improving patient care. This study explored the capabilities of ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art natural language processing model, in predicting in-hospital mortality for sepsis patients.

METHODS

This study utilized data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) database, collected between 2019 and 2021, focusing on adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and aiming to determine whether ChatGPT could predict all-cause mortality after ICU admission at 7 and 30 days. Structured prompts enabled ChatGPT to engage in in-context learning, with the number of patient examples varying from zero to six. The predictive capabilities of ChatGPT-3.5-turbo and ChatGPT-4 were then compared against a gradient boosting model (GBM) using various performance metrics.

RESULTS

From the KSA database, 4,786 patients formed the 7-day mortality prediction dataset, of whom 718 died, and 4,025 patients formed the 30-day dataset, with 1,368 deaths. Age and clinical markers (e.g., Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and lactic acid levels) showed significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in both datasets. For 7-day mortality predictions, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.70-0.83 for GPT-4, 0.51-0.70 for GPT-3.5, and 0.79 for GBM. The AUROC for 30-day mortality was 0.51-0.59 for GPT-4, 0.47-0.57 for GPT-3.5, and 0.76 for GBM. Zero-shot predictions using GPT-4 for mortality from ICU admission to day 30 showed AUROCs from the mid-0.60s to 0.75 for GPT-4 and mainly from 0.47 to 0.63 for GPT-3.5.

CONCLUSIONS

GPT-4 demonstrated potential in predicting short-term in-hospital mortality, although its performance varied across different evaluation metrics.

摘要

目的

脓毒症是全球主要的死亡原因,预测其预后对于改善患者护理至关重要。本研究探讨了先进的自然语言处理模型ChatGPT预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率的能力。

方法

本研究利用了韩国脓毒症联盟(KSA)数据库在2019年至2021年期间收集的数据,重点关注成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者,旨在确定ChatGPT能否预测ICU入院后7天和30天的全因死亡率。结构化提示使ChatGPT能够进行上下文学习,患者示例数量从零到六个不等。然后使用各种性能指标将ChatGPT-3.5-turbo和ChatGPT-4的预测能力与梯度提升模型(GBM)进行比较。

结果

从KSA数据库中,4786名患者构成了7天死亡率预测数据集,其中718人死亡;4025名患者构成了30天数据集,有1368人死亡。在两个数据集中,年龄和临床指标(如序贯器官衰竭评估评分和乳酸水平)在幸存者和非幸存者之间存在显著差异。对于7天死亡率预测,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)在GPT-4为0.70-0.83,GPT-3.5为0.51-0.70,GBM为0.79。对于30天死亡率,GPT-4的AUROC为0.51-0.59,GPT-3.5为0.47-0.57,GBM为0.76。使用GPT-4对从ICU入院到第30天的死亡率进行零样本预测,GPT-4的AUROC从中0.60多到0.75,GPT-3.5主要从0.47到0.63。

结论

GPT-4在预测短期院内死亡率方面显示出潜力,尽管其在不同评估指标下的表现有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/aa44e6f4ea6a/hir-2024-30-3-266f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/5b80bf1ab962/hir-2024-30-3-266f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/4dc2810d1339/hir-2024-30-3-266f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/18709b996862/hir-2024-30-3-266f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/aa44e6f4ea6a/hir-2024-30-3-266f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/5b80bf1ab962/hir-2024-30-3-266f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/4dc2810d1339/hir-2024-30-3-266f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/18709b996862/hir-2024-30-3-266f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ec/11333818/aa44e6f4ea6a/hir-2024-30-3-266f4.jpg

相似文献

1
ChatGPT Predicts In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality for Sepsis: In-Context Learning with the Korean Sepsis Alliance Database.ChatGPT预测脓毒症患者的院内全因死亡率:基于韩国脓毒症联盟数据库的情境学习
Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Jul;30(3):266-276. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.266. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
The potential and pitfalls of using a large language model such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, or LLaMA as a clinical assistant.使用大型语言模型(如 ChatGPT、GPT-4 或 Llama)作为临床助手的潜力和陷阱。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):1884-1891. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae184.
3
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
4
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
5
[Clinical predictive value of short-term dynamic changes in platelet counts for prognosis of sepsis patients in intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study in adults].[血小板计数短期动态变化对重症监护病房脓毒症患者预后的临床预测价值:一项针对成人的回顾性队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):301-306. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20190909-00069.
6
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分预测越南重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e064870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870.
7
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
8
Predictive validity of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score for the mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对越南重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率的预测效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0275739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275739. eCollection 2022.
9
Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.利用生成式人工智能辅助学习罕见且复杂的诊断:对流行的大型语言模型的定性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Feb 13;10:e51391. doi: 10.2196/51391.
10
Performance and exploration of ChatGPT in medical examination, records and education in Chinese: Pave the way for medical AI.ChatGPT 在中文体检、病历和教育方面的表现和探索:为医疗 AI 铺平道路。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105173. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation-Based Electronic Medical Record Chatbot System.基于检索增强生成的电子病历聊天机器人系统的开发与评估
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Jul;31(3):218-225. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.3.218. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines.健康系统规模的语言模型是通用的预测引擎。
Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7969):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06160-y. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
ChatGPT goes to the operating room: evaluating GPT-4 performance and its potential in surgical education and training in the era of large language models.ChatGPT走进手术室:在大语言模型时代评估GPT-4在外科教育与培训中的表现及其潜力。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 May;104(5):269-273. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.5.269. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment.
人工智能聊天机器人在眼科知识评估中的表现。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):589-597. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.1144.
4
Serial evaluation of the serum lactate level with the SOFA score to predict mortality in patients with sepsis.连续评估血清乳酸水平与 SOFA 评分对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测价值。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33227-7.
5
How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment.ChatGPT在美国医师执照考试(USMLE)中的表现如何?大语言模型对医学教育和知识评估的影响。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Feb 8;9:e45312. doi: 10.2196/45312.
6
Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.用于脓毒症预后早期预测的可解释机器学习:一项发现与验证研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
7
Understanding the complexity of sepsis mortality prediction via rule discovery and analysis: a pilot study.通过规则发现和分析理解脓毒症死亡率预测的复杂性:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 28;21(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01690-9.
8
Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree.使用梯度提升决策树预测重症监护病房脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025813.
9
A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.机器学习模型与临床评估在预测脓毒症患者死亡率方面的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245157. eCollection 2021.
10
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.