Zhuan Sunyoumeng, Zhu Yutong, Zhou Jingyi, Lei Senlin, Wang Xin, Li Juan
Linyi Vocational College of Science and Technology, Linyi, Shandong, China.
School of Physical Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 5;15:1436441. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1436441. eCollection 2024.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of high-intensity deep squat training integrated with various blood flow restriction (BFR) modalities on the activation of lower limb and core muscles.
A randomized, self-controlled crossover experimental design was employed with 12 participants. The exercise protocol consisted of squat training at 75% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), performed in 3 sets of 8 repetitions with a 2-min inter-set rest period. This was conducted under four distinct BFR conditions: continuous low BFR (T1), intermittent medium BFR (T2), intermittent high BFR (T3), and a non-restricted control (C). Surface electromyography (EMG) was utilized to collect EMG signals from the target muscles during the BFR and squat training sessions. The root mean square (RMS) amplitude standard values were calculated for each squat set to quantify muscle activation levels, with these values expressed as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC). Rating of Perceived Exertion was evaluated after each squat set, and leg circumference measurements were taken.
All BFR modalities significantly enhanced the activation level of the anterior thigh muscles, with the continuous low BFR mode demonstrating a more stable effect. No significant differences were found in the activation level of the rectus abdominis among the groups. However, the intermittent high BFR mode was the most effective in increasing the activation level of the erector spinae muscles. While BFR did not further augment leg circumference changes, it did elevate subjective fatigue levels. The RPE was lowest during squatting under the intermittent high BFR condition.
本研究的主要目的是评估高强度深蹲训练结合不同的血流限制(BFR)方式对下肢和核心肌肉激活的影响。
采用随机、自身对照的交叉实验设计,共有12名参与者。运动方案包括以一次重复最大重量(1RM)的75%进行深蹲训练,每组8次,共3组,组间休息2分钟。这在四种不同的BFR条件下进行:持续低BFR(T1)、间歇中BFR(T2)、间歇高BFR(T3)和无限制对照(C)。在BFR和深蹲训练期间,利用表面肌电图(EMG)从目标肌肉收集EMG信号。计算每组深蹲的均方根(RMS)振幅标准值,以量化肌肉激活水平,这些值以最大自主收缩的百分比(%MVC)表示。每组深蹲后评估主观用力程度,并测量腿部周长。
1)在前两组深蹲中,所有加压组的股外侧肌和股内侧肌的%MVC均显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。此外,在第一组中,T3组的股外侧肌%MVC显著高于T2组(p<0.05)。在第三组中,T1组和T3组的股内侧肌%MVC显著低于前两组(p<0.05)。2)T1组在第二组和第三组中股二头肌和半腱肌的激活增加,%MVC值显著大于第一组(p<0.05)。T2组仅在第三组中股二头肌激活增加(p<0.05)。T3组仅在第一组中显著增加了股二头肌和半腱肌的激活(p<0.05)。3)各组腹直肌%MVC的变化无显著差异(p>0.05)。在第一组中,T3组的竖脊肌%MVC显著高于对照组;在第二组中,显著高于T2组和对照组(p<0.05)。4)训练后,与训练前相比,所有组的大腿周长均显著增加(p<0.05)。5)对于主观用力程度(RPE)值,T2组在所有三组深蹲后的数值均显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。T1组在第三组深蹲后的RPE值也显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。T1组、T2组和C组在第二组和第三组的RPE值均显著高于第一组(p<0.05)。
所有BFR方式均显著提高了大腿前侧肌肉的激活水平,持续低BFR模式显示出更稳定的效果。各组腹直肌的激活水平无显著差异。然而,间歇高BFR模式在提高竖脊肌的激活水平方面最有效。虽然BFR没有进一步增加腿部周长的变化,但确实提高了主观疲劳水平。在间歇高BFR条件下深蹲时,RPE最低。