• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行业治理对群体产品伤害危机后信任影响的研究

The research on the impact of industry governance on trust after group product-harm crisis.

作者信息

Li Yalin, Zhao Min

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Suqian University, No.399, Huanghe South Road, Suqian, Jiangsu Province, 223800, China.

School of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, No.8, Yangqiaohu Road, Jiangxia, Wuhan, 430205, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35229. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35229
PMID:39161808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11332881/
Abstract

The group product-harm crisis has much greater and longer negative impact, and its governance has become an important issue. To address this issue, this study proposed a new construct: industry governance. On the basis of clarifying the dimensions and measurements of industry governance, this study constructed a reflective-formative hierarchical model and collected data through a questionnaire. Utilizing convenience sampling, 329 valid samples at the University in Wuhan, China collected by survey were used to verify the hypotheses. With the help of Smart PLS 3.0, this study finds that the industry governance has a significant and positive impact on consumer's trust (enterprise trust, industry trust and government trust) after the group product-harm crisis. Industry governance plays an important role in the governance of group product-harm crisis. This study is the first time to explore the structure and measurement of industry governance, and verifies the impact of industry governance on group product-harm crisis, which enriches governance theory, and perfects product-harm crisis theory, providing a new direction and guidance for managers to better manage product-harm crisis.

摘要

群体产品伤害危机具有更大、更持久的负面影响,其治理已成为一个重要问题。为解决这一问题,本研究提出了一个新的构念:行业治理。在明确行业治理的维度和测量方法的基础上,本研究构建了一个反映性-构成性层次模型,并通过问卷调查收集数据。利用便利抽样,对在中国武汉某大学通过调查收集的329个有效样本进行假设检验。借助Smart PLS 3.0,本研究发现,在群体产品伤害危机发生后,行业治理对消费者信任(企业信任、行业信任和政府信任)具有显著的正向影响。行业治理在群体产品伤害危机治理中发挥着重要作用。本研究首次探索了行业治理的结构和测量方法,并验证了行业治理对群体产品伤害危机的影响,丰富了治理理论,完善了产品伤害危机理论,为管理者更好地管理产品伤害危机提供了新的方向和指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a4/11332881/c9576fccebcc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a4/11332881/1e324706193f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a4/11332881/c9576fccebcc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a4/11332881/1e324706193f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1a4/11332881/c9576fccebcc/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
The research on the impact of industry governance on trust after group product-harm crisis.行业治理对群体产品伤害危机后信任影响的研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35229. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
2
How do Institutional Investors Influence Corporate Governance under Legal Psychology.机构投资者如何在法律心理学下影响公司治理
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;2022:5004309. doi: 10.1155/2022/5004309. eCollection 2022.
3
Transition to sustainable transport: understanding the antecedents of consumer's intention to adopt electric vehicles from the emotional research perspective.向可持续交通转型:从情感研究视角理解消费者采用电动汽车意愿的前因
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):20362-20374. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12006-1. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Perceived social fairness and trust in government serially mediate the effect of governance quality on subjective well-being.民众感知的社会公平和对政府的信任,在治理质量对主观幸福感的影响中起连续中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 10;14(1):15905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67124-4.
5
A tripartite evolutionary game study on green governance in China's coating industry.中国涂料行业绿色治理的三方演化博弈研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):61161-61177. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20220-2. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
6
Institutional Network Relationship of Chinese Public Crisis Governance System-Based on the Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Policies during SARS and COVID-19.中国公共危机治理体系的制度网络关系——基于 SARS 和 COVID-19 期间政策的定量比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215100.
7
Government-enterprise green collaborative governance and urban carbon emission reduction: Empirical evidence from green PPP programs.政府-企业绿色协同治理与城市碳排放减排:绿色 PPP 项目的实证证据。
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119335. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119335. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
8
What accounts for the different regional responses to COVID-19 in China? Exploring the role of institutional environment, governance capacity and legitimacy.中国各地区对 COVID-19 为何会有不同的反应?探究制度环境、治理能力和合法性的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):552-566. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad007.
9
Government Trust, Environmental Pollution Perception, and Environmental Governance Satisfaction.政府信任、环境污染感知与环境治理满意度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169929.
10
What Influences the Perceived Trust of a Voice-Enabled Smart Home System: An Empirical Study.影响语音智能家庭系统感知信任的因素:一项实证研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;21(6):2037. doi: 10.3390/s21062037.

本文引用的文献

1
Government-enterprise green collaborative governance and urban carbon emission reduction: Empirical evidence from green PPP programs.政府-企业绿色协同治理与城市碳排放减排:绿色 PPP 项目的实证证据。
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119335. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119335. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Prevention of food fraud and fraud emulation among companies in the supply chain based on a social Co-governance framework.基于社会共同治理框架预防供应链中各公司之间的食品欺诈及欺诈模仿行为。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 29;10(9):e30340. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30340. eCollection 2024 May 15.
3
Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19.
公民对政府的信任是善治以及政府机构在新冠疫情期间在社交媒体上提供高质量信息的函数。
Gov Inf Q. 2021 Oct;38(4):101597. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
The objects, agents, and tools of Chinese co-governance on air pollution: a review.中国空气污染协同治理的对象、主体和工具:述评。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):24972-24991. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13642-x. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
Social support, rural/urban residence, and depressive symptoms among Chinese adults.社会支持、城乡居住与中国成年人抑郁症状。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):849-861. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22302. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems in Practice?社会制度多样性如何影响社会-生态系统实践中的协同治理?
Environ Manage. 2019 Feb;63(2):200-214. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1123-5. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Trust during the early stages of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行早期的信任。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(3):321-39. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811323. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Public support for government actions during a flu pandemic: lessons learned from a statewide survey.流感大流行期间公众对政府行动的支持:来自全州调查的经验教训。
Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):60S-72S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908322114.
9
Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations.沉默胜过千言万语:相较于道歉和否认,沉默在应对基于正直和能力的信任侵犯时的有效性。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):893-908. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.893.
10
Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations.消除怀疑的阴影:道歉与否认对修复基于能力与诚信的信任违背行为的影响
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):104-18. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104.