Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae243.
Two experiments were conducted to test the hypotheses that particle size of field peas and location where peas are grown do not affect apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients and gross energy, digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy (NE), apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of starch, or standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA). In both experiments, 3 sources of field peas were used. One source was obtained from the United States and 2 sources were obtained from Canada (i.e., Canada 1 and Canada 2). The U.S. field peas were ground to 678, 457, or 265 µm, whereas the 2 sources of Canadian peas were ground to 411 and 415 µm, respectively. Therefore, 5 batches of field peas were used in both experiments. A basal diet contained corn and soybean meal as the only source of energy, starch, and AA, and 5 diets containing corn and soybean meal and 50% of each source of field peas were also formulated. The ratio between corn and soybean meal was 1.92:1 in all diets. In experiment 1, an N-free diet was also used to calculate basal endogenous losses of AA and CP, but in experiment 2, no N-free diet was used. In experiment 1, 7 barrows (initial body weight = 60.6 ± 2.1 kg) that had a T-cannula installed in the distal ileum were allotted to a 7 × 7 Latin square design with 7 diets and 7 periods. In experiment 2, 24 pigs (initial body weight = 30.8 ± 1.0 kg) were housed in 6 calorimeter chambers with 4 pigs per chamber. The 6 chambers were allotted to one of the 6 diets using a 6 × 6 Latin square design with 6 consecutive periods of 15 d. Results of experiment 1 demonstrated that the SID of CP and AA was not influenced by the origin of the peas or by the particle size, but the AID of starch increased (linear, P < 0.001) as particle size was reduced from 678 to 457 or 265 µm. Results of experiment 2 indicated that growing location did not affect concentrations of DE, ME, or NE of field peas, but concentrations of DE, ME, and NE increased (linear, P < 0.05) when particle size was reduced from 678 to 457 or 265 µm. In conclusion, field peas grown in Canada or the United States have the same nutritional value, but starch digestibility and NE increase if the particle size of field peas is reduced.
豌豆的颗粒大小和种植地点不会影响养分和总能的表观全肠道消化率、可消化能 (DE)、代谢能 (ME) 和净能 (NE)、淀粉的表观回肠消化率 (AID) 或粗蛋白 (CP) 和氨基酸 (AA) 的标准回肠消化率 (SID)。在这两项实验中,使用了 3 种来源的豌豆。一种来源是从美国获得的,另外 2 种是从加拿大获得的(即加拿大 1 号和加拿大 2 号)。美国的豌豆被磨成 678、457 或 265µm,而加拿大的 2 种豌豆分别磨成 411 和 415µm。因此,在这两项实验中,使用了 5 批豌豆。基础日粮仅包含玉米和豆粕作为能量、淀粉和 AA 的唯一来源,还配制了包含玉米和豆粕以及 50%每种来源的豌豆的 5 种日粮。所有日粮中玉米和豆粕的比例为 1.92:1。在实验 1 中,还使用了无氮日粮来计算 AA 和 CP 的基础内源性损失,但在实验 2 中,没有使用无氮日粮。在实验 1 中,将 7 头装有回肠 T 型管的阉公猪分配到一个 7×7 拉丁方设计,其中包含 7 种日粮和 7 个周期。在实验 2 中,将 24 头猪(初始体重为 30.8±1.0kg)饲养在 6 个热量计室中,每个室 4 头猪。使用 6×6 拉丁方设计,6 个连续的 15d 周期,将 6 个热量计室分配到 6 种日粮中的一种。实验 1 的结果表明,CP 和 AA 的 SID 不受豌豆来源或颗粒大小的影响,但随着颗粒大小从 678µm 减小到 457µm 或 265µm,淀粉的 AID 增加(线性,P<0.001)。实验 2 的结果表明,种植地点不会影响豌豆的 DE、ME 或 NE 浓度,但当颗粒大小从 678µm 减小到 457µm 或 265µm 时,DE、ME 和 NE 的浓度增加(线性,P<0.05)。总之,来自加拿大或美国的豌豆具有相同的营养价值,但如果降低豌豆的颗粒大小,淀粉消化率和 NE 会增加。