• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受姑息性放疗的身体状况良好的晚期、不可手术的非小细胞肺癌患者中,全身炎症的流行率和预后价值:复合比和累积评分的比较。

The prevalence and prognostic value of systemic inflammation in good performance status patients with advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: Comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70139. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70139.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.70139
PMID:39164973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11335809/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The present study sought to examine the relationships between systemic inflammatory composite ratios/cumulative scores, magnitude of systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and survival in good performance status patients (ECOG-PS 0/1) with advanced NSCLC receiving palliative radiotherapy.

METHODS

Systemic inflammatory composite ratios/cumulative scores included the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), C-reactive protein, (CRP)-albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil- lymphocyte score (NLS), platelet-lymphocyte score (PLS), lymphocyte-monocyte score (LMS), neutrophil-platelet score (NPS), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS). The magnitude of SIR was determined by serum CRP concentration, with a median CRP concentration of >10 m mg/L considered to be systemically inflamed. Relationships between systemic inflammatory composite ratios/ cumulative scores and clinicopathological characteristics were examined using chi-square analysis. Relationships between overall survival (OS) and systemic inflammatory composite ratios/ cumulative scores were examined using cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

479 patients were included. 48% (n = 231) of patients were male and 70% (n = 338) were ≥65 years of age. 29% (n = 140) patients were ECOG-PS 0 and 71% (n = 339) were ECOG-PS 1. 98% (n = 469) of patients died during follow-up. The median survival was 5 months (2-11). A similar prevalence of systemic inflammation was noted across the various ratios/scores (NLR >3 68%; LMR <2.4 65%; PLR >150 70%; CAR >0.20 83%; NLS ≥1 66%; LMS ≥1 71%; NPS≥1 50%; PLS≥1 60% and mGPS≥1 75%). Despite not considered to be systemically inflamed, an NLR <3, LMR ≥2.4, PLR ≤150, NLS 0, LMS 0, NPS 0 and PLS 0 all had a median CRP concentration of >10 mg/L. When adjusted for ECOG-PS, CAR>0.40 (p < 0.001) and mGPS 2 (p < 0.05) remained significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Liver-based measures of systemic inflammation (CAR and mGPS) appear more reliable for the quantification of the magnitude of SIR and have prognostic value in patients with advanced NSCLC.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨全身炎症复合比/累积评分、全身炎症反应程度(SIR)与接受姑息性放疗的体能状态良好(ECOG-PS 0/1)的晚期 NSCLC 患者的生存之间的关系。

方法

全身炎症复合比/累积评分包括中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比(NLR)、血小板-淋巴细胞比(PLR)、淋巴细胞-单核细胞比(LMR)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)-白蛋白比(CAR)、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞评分(NLS)、血小板-淋巴细胞评分(PLS)、淋巴细胞-单核细胞评分(LMS)、中性粒细胞-血小板评分(NPS)、改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)。SIR 的程度通过血清 CRP 浓度确定,以中位数 CRP 浓度>10mg/L 作为全身性炎症。采用卡方检验分析全身炎症复合比/累积评分与临床病理特征的关系。采用 COX 回归分析全身炎症复合比/累积评分与总生存(OS)的关系。

结果

共纳入 479 例患者。48%(n=231)为男性,70%(n=338)年龄≥65 岁。29%(n=140)的患者 ECOG-PS 评分为 0,71%(n=339)的患者 ECOG-PS 评分为 1。98%(n=469)的患者在随访期间死亡。中位生存时间为 5 个月(2-11)。各种比值/评分的全身性炎症发生率相似(NLR>3 为 68%;LMR<2.4 为 65%;PLR>150 为 70%;CAR>0.20 为 83%;NLS≥1 为 66%;LMS≥1 为 71%;NPS≥1 为 50%;PLS≥1 为 60%,mGPS≥1 为 75%)。尽管未被认为是全身性炎症,但 NLR<3、LMR≥2.4、PLR≤150、NLS 0、LMS 0、NPS 0 和 PLS 0 的中位 CRP 浓度均>10mg/L。在校正 ECOG-PS 后,CAR>0.40(p<0.001)和 mGPS 2(p<0.05)仍与 OS 显著相关。

结论

基于肝脏的全身炎症指标(CAR 和 mGPS)似乎更能可靠地量化 SIR 的程度,并对晚期 NSCLC 患者具有预后价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/11335809/fd2d333a0c4e/CAM4-13-e70139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/11335809/fd2d333a0c4e/CAM4-13-e70139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a7/11335809/fd2d333a0c4e/CAM4-13-e70139-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The prevalence and prognostic value of systemic inflammation in good performance status patients with advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: Comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.在接受姑息性放疗的身体状况良好的晚期、不可手术的非小细胞肺癌患者中,全身炎症的流行率和预后价值:复合比和累积评分的比较。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70139. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70139.
2
The prognostic value of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer: comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.系统炎症对结肠癌手术患者的预后价值:复合比和累积评分的比较。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jul;119(1):40-51. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0095-9. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Effect of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio on prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值对晚期非小细胞肺癌预后的影响
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;14(6):402-409. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13055. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Prognostic effect of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.全身炎症对肝细胞癌手术患者的预后影响:综合比率与累积评分的比较
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(10):6154-6165. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2089.
5
Pre-radiosurgery leucocyte ratios and modified glasgow prognostic score predict survival in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases patients.放疗前白细胞比值和改良格拉斯哥预后评分可预测非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的生存。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Jan;151(2):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03660-z. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is a superior prognostic biomarker to other systemic inflammatory response markers in non-small cell lung cancer.术前血小板与淋巴细胞比值是预测非小细胞肺癌预后的一项优于其他全身炎症反应标志物的生物标志物。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(4):e18607. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018607.
7
Clinical utility of the pretreatment glasgow prognostic score in patients with advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.在无法手术的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,预处理格拉斯哥预后评分的临床实用性。
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Apr;7(4):655-62. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318244ffe1.
8
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为接受纳武单抗治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预后标志物。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;111:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
9
A comparison of the prognostic value of composite ratios and cumulative scores in patients with operable rectal cancer.比较复合比和累积评分在可手术直肠癌患者中的预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73909-0.
10
Prognostic utility of blood inflammation biomarkers before and after treatment on the survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy.治疗前后血液炎症生物标志物对行立体定向体部放疗的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的预后价值。
Clin Respir J. 2024 May;18(5):e13749. doi: 10.1111/crj.13749.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflammatory Pathways and Immune Microenvironment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Multi-Dimensional Analysis and Machine Learning Prediction.非小细胞肺癌中的炎症途径与免疫微环境:多维分析与机器学习预测
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Jul;29(14):e70689. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70689.
2
The prognostic value of a laboratory cachexia score (LCAS) defined by LDH, CRP and albumin in patients with advanced lung cancer.由乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和白蛋白定义的实验室恶病质评分(LCAS)在晚期肺癌患者中的预后价值。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13426-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The association of nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers with overall survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.营养和炎症生物标志物与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者总生存期的关联。
Thorac Cancer. 2024 Aug;15(23):1764-1771. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15401. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Integration of on-treatment modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) to improve imaging-based prediction of outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer on immune checkpoint inhibition.基于治疗的改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)与影像学相结合,以改善免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的预后预测。
Lung Cancer. 2024 Mar;189:107505. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107505. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Soluble biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer treated by immune checkpoints inhibitors.
可溶性生物标志物预测免疫检查点抑制剂治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床结局。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 22;14:1171649. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1171649. eCollection 2023.
4
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment with Molecularly Targeted Therapy and Concurrent Radiotherapy-A Review.非小细胞肺癌的分子靶向治疗联合放疗:综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 20;24(6):5858. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065858.
5
Inflammation and Performance Status: The Cornerstones of Prognosis in Advanced Cancer.炎症和体能状态:晚期癌症预后的基石。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Apr;65(4):348-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.021. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
6
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Markers for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为免疫治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌预后标志物的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 8;58(8):1069. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081069.
7
A comprehensive analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)/the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy among patients with advanced cancer.全面分析格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)/改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)对晚期癌症患者免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4940. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
8
Relationship between Patients' Baseline Characteristics and Survival Benefits in Immunotherapy-Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.免疫治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者基线特征与生存获益之间的关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Oncol. 2022 May 19;2022:3601942. doi: 10.1155/2022/3601942. eCollection 2022.
9
Prognostic effect of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.全身炎症对肝细胞癌手术患者的预后影响:综合比率与累积评分的比较
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(10):6154-6165. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2089.
10
Current state of knowledge on immunotherapy in ECOG PS 2 patients. A systematic review.ECOG PS 2 患者免疫治疗的现有知识状况。系统评价。
Adv Med Sci. 2021 Sep;66(2):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 24.