Suppr超能文献

不同再矿化剂对釉质白斑病变的显微硬度和化学成分的疗效。

Efficacy of different remineralization agents on microhardness and chemical composition of enamel white spot lesion.

作者信息

Ghanim Rahman Rafal, Diab Ban Sahib

机构信息

preventive and pedodontics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq.

Prof. Department of Preventive and Pedodontic Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Sep 3;13:505. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.149166.1. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

White spot lesions (WSLs) are frequently linked with low microhardness and mineral content changes. several strategies have been employed to deal with these problems. This investigation aimed to analyze the microhardness and mineral content changes after remineralization with bioactive glass (BAG) and casein phospho-peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride (CPP-ACPF).

METHODS

Twenty sound maxillary first premolars extracted were used to obtain a total of one hundred enamel samples. forty enamel slabs were split into four experimental groups (n = 10 each): Group I, BAG; Group II, BAG+CPP-ACPF; Group III, CPP-ACPF varnish; and Group IV, artificial saliva (negative control). To create artificial WSLs, all samples were preserved in a prepared demineralizing agent for 72 h before treatment with remineralizing agents. Vickers microhardness test was performed. Additionally, 60 enamel samples were selected for analysis using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) and assigned to six experimental groups; the first four groups were similar to that used in the microhardness test along with Group V: WSLs, and Group VI: baseline. The statistical analyses employed in this study included Tukey's HSD (p<0.05), one-way ANOVA, and Shapiro-Wilk.

RESULT

Regarding surface microhardness, the BAG+CPP-ACPF group showed the most favorable recovery, which was better than the outcomes of the BAG and CPP-ACPF groups. A statistically significant change (p <0.05) was not observed between them. Similarly, for mineral content change, the BAG+CPP-ACPF group demonstrated the greatest result, The BAG group came next, and the CPP-ACPF group came last.

CONCLUSION

The BAG+CPP-ACPF group might be regarded as the best course of treatment for enhancing both the surface microhardness and mineral content (Ca, P), while the control group (Artificial saliva) showed the least satisfactory results in comparison. After demineralization, mineral content and microhardness decreased in all samples. Therefore, BAG+CPP-ACPF significantly improved the surface microhardness and mineral content.

摘要

背景

白斑病变(WSLs)常与低显微硬度和矿物质含量变化相关。已采用多种策略来处理这些问题。本研究旨在分析用生物活性玻璃(BAG)和含氟酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形磷酸钙(CPP - ACPF)再矿化后显微硬度和矿物质含量的变化。

方法

使用拔除的20颗健康上颌第一前磨牙获取总共100个牙釉质样本。将40个牙釉质片分成四个实验组(每组n = 10):第一组,BAG;第二组,BAG + CPP - ACPF;第三组,CPP - ACPF清漆;第四组,人工唾液(阴性对照)。为制造人工白斑病变,所有样本在用再矿化剂处理前在制备好的脱矿剂中保存72小时。进行维氏显微硬度测试。此外,选择60个牙釉质样本使用能量色散光谱(EDX)进行分析,并分为六个实验组;前四组与显微硬度测试中使用的组相似,另外还有第五组:白斑病变,和第六组:基线。本研究中采用的统计分析包括Tukey's HSD(p<0.05)、单因素方差分析和Shapiro - Wilk检验。

结果

关于表面显微硬度,BAG + CPP - ACPF组显示出最有利的恢复情况,优于BAG组和CPP - ACPF组的结果。它们之间未观察到统计学上的显著变化(p <0.05)。同样,对于矿物质含量变化,BAG + CPP - ACPF组显示出最好的结果,其次是BAG组,最后是CPP - ACPF组。

结论

BAG + CPP - ACPF组可能被视为增强表面显微硬度和矿物质含量(钙、磷)的最佳治疗方案,而对照组(人工唾液)相比之下显示出最不理想的结果。脱矿后,所有样本的矿物质含量和显微硬度均下降。因此,BAG + CPP - ACPF显著改善了表面显微硬度和矿物质含量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/11372357/2f1e124c795c/f1000research-13-170911-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验