Funk Luca, Hefermehl Lukas John, Hofmann Severin, Nikitin Anna, Bieri Uwe
Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, CHE.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 21;16(7):e65026. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65026. eCollection 2024 Jul.
We report a case of transperineostomal bipolar resection of the prostate (TPR-P) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). To our knowledge, this is the first description in the scientific literature. A 67-year-old man with a medical history of multiple penile debridements and formation of a perineostomy due to an episode of severe Fournier's gangrene in 2015, was admitted to the emergency room with acute urinary retention. Consecutively, a suprapubic catheter was inserted. Attempts of catheterization failed due to bulbar stenosis and an obstructive prostatic urethra. After the resolution by dilatation of the bulbar stenosis, post-voiding residual volume persisted at up to 150 ml. The intra- and postoperative course after TPR-P was uneventful. No adverse events occurred. The assessment after six weeks revealed an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improvement of nearly 50% for the symptoms and >60% for overall satisfaction (preoperative: IPSS: S=24, L=6; postoperative IPSS: S=13, L=2). The average post-voiding residual volume decreased from 150 ml preoperatively to 15 ml (range 0-30 ml) postoperatively. Due to the missing full length of the urethra, the augmented range of motion seemed almost too loose for classic resection techniques in our hands. Therefore, we believe that in such cases it might be advantageous to use enucleation techniques. However, in our case, TPR-P was feasible and safe with a good functional outcome.
我们报告了一例经会阴造口前列腺双极切除术(TPR-P)治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)的病例。据我们所知,这是科学文献中的首次描述。一名67岁男性,有多次阴茎清创病史,因2015年一次严重的福尼尔坏疽发作形成会阴造口,因急性尿潴留入住急诊室。随后插入了耻骨上导管。由于球部狭窄和前列腺尿道梗阻,导尿尝试失败。球部狭窄扩张解决后,排尿后残余尿量仍高达150 ml。TPR-P术中和术后过程顺利。未发生不良事件。六周后的评估显示,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)症状改善近50%,总体满意度改善>60%(术前:IPSS:S=24,L=6;术后IPSS:S=13,L=2)。平均排尿后残余尿量从术前的150 ml降至术后的15 ml(范围0-30 ml)。由于尿道全长缺失,在我们手中,经典切除技术的活动范围扩大似乎几乎太松了。因此,我们认为在这种情况下,使用剜除技术可能是有利的。然而,在我们的病例中,TPR-P是可行且安全的,功能结果良好。