Ketabchi Ali Asghar, Ketabchi Mahsa, Barkam Mohsen
Urology Department, Physiology Research center, Kerman Medical Sciences University, Kerman, IR Iran.
Nephrourol Mon. 2013 Spring;5(2):758-61. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.6607. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the most common surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional bipolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) with a modified transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) in men with mild to moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
To compare and evaluate the clinical outcomes of M-TURP, a new electrosurgical suggested method, with the standard treatment, transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), 200 patients with benign prostatic enlargement causing moderate to severe clinical lower urinary symptoms were selected and divided into two equal groups of A and B. Patients of group A underwent M-TURP (incomplete bladder neck resection), resecting only from 1 to 11 O'clock position and group B underwent conventional TURP. These patients were evaluated between Jun 2008 and April 2011, after excluding 24 patients, finally 176 men were studied, 98 in the conventional monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) group and 78 in the (M-TURP) group. Postoperative follow up to assess the results of the surgeries and the complication rates, began from the operation and continued with postoperative visits of the patient at 24 hour after the catheter remove, two weeks, three months and finally six months.
The age range of both groups were the same (65-82 years old), preoperative IPSS score in study and control groups were 18 ± 3.3, 17 ± 4.6 (nonsignificant P value = ns) respectively. The size of prostate gland was 58 ± 3.5 g in study and 78 ± 1.2 g in control (ns) preoperatively. Intra and postoperative complications including hematuria (need for transfusion), urine retention (need for catheterization), fever after operation in study and control groups were 2.04%, 6.41%, 1.02% and 0.0%, 3.06%, 6.41% respectively. ISI score (stress incontinence score index) were 7 ± 2.5 and 19 ± 3.6 and UR (urge ratio) were %26 and %70 for study and control groups respectively; P < 0.05. IIEF (international index of erectile function) in study group was better than control (23 ± 3.2 vs. 11 ± 1.7), P < 0.05.
The results of this study showed that the support of anterior fibro muscular zone (anterior lobe) of prostate after TUR-P has a significant role in postoperative complications, especially in postoperative stress incontinence. So, we strongly recommend to preserve this segment of prostate for prevention of incontinence and other intra and postoperative complications.
经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)是良性前列腺增生最常见的外科治疗方法。
本研究旨在比较传统双极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)与改良经尿道前列腺切除术(M-TURP)在轻至中度良性前列腺增生症状男性中的疗效。
为比较和评估一种新的电外科建议方法M-TURP与标准治疗方法经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的临床疗效,选取200例因良性前列腺增生导致中度至重度临床下尿路症状的患者,分为A、B两组,每组100例。A组患者接受M-TURP(不完全膀胱颈切除术),仅从1点至11点位置切除,B组患者接受传统TURP。对这些患者在2008年6月至2011年4月期间进行评估,排除24例患者后,最终研究了176例男性,其中传统单极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)组98例,M-TURP组78例。术后随访评估手术结果和并发症发生率,从手术开始,在拔除导尿管后24小时、两周、三个月及最后六个月对患者进行术后随访。
两组患者年龄范围相同(65 - 82岁),研究组和对照组术前国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)分别为18±3.3、17±4.6(P值无统计学意义=ns)。术前研究组前列腺大小为58±3.5g,对照组为