Suppr超能文献

新手从业者进行的混合现实辅助腰椎穿刺与标志性引导腰椎穿刺的比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of Mixed Reality-Assisted Spinal Puncture with Landmark-Guided Spinal Puncture by Novice Practitioners: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Gao Lei, Xu Yidi, Zhang Xixue, Jiang Zhaoshun, Wu Jiajun, Dong Yanjun, Li Ming, Jin Liang, Qiu Jianjian, You Lijue, Qin Chunhui, Gu Weidong

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Clinical Geriatric Medicine, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Aug 16;17:2701-2712. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S470285. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Performing spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients with ligament calcification or hyperostosis is challenging for novice practitioners. This pilot study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mixed reality-assisted spinal puncture (MRasp) with that of landmark-guided spinal puncture (LGsp) by novice practitioners in elderly patients.

METHODS

In this pilot study, 36 patients (aged ≥65 years) scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anaesthesia by anaesthesiology residents were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the MRasp group (n = 18) or the LGsp group (n = 18). The outcomes included the number of needle insertion attempts, redirection attempts, passes, the rate of successful first-attempt needle insertion, the rate of successful first needle pass, the spinal puncture time, the total procedure time, and the incidence of perioperative complications.

RESULTS

The median number of needle insertion attempts was significantly fewer in the MRasp group than in the LGsp group (1.0 vs 2.0, = 0.023). The proportion of patients with successful first-attempt needle insertion was 72.2% in the MRasp group and 44.4% in the LGsp group ( = 0.176). The incidence of perioperative complications did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study found that novice practitioners made significantly fewer needle insertion attempts in the MRasp group compared to the LGsp group when performing spinal anaesthesia on elderly patients. A future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is warranted to validate its effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=178960 (ChiCTR-IPR-2300068520). Public title: Mixed reality-assisted versus landmark-guided spinal puncture in elderly patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Principal investigator: Lei Gao. The registration date was February 22, 2023. The date of the first participant enrolment was February 27, 2023.

摘要

背景

对于新手从业者而言,为伴有韧带钙化或骨质增生的老年患者实施脊髓麻醉具有挑战性。这项前瞻性研究旨在比较新手从业者在老年患者中采用混合现实辅助脊髓穿刺(MRasp)与体表标志引导脊髓穿刺(LGsp)的效果。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了36例计划在脊髓麻醉下接受择期手术的患者(年龄≥65岁),由麻醉科住院医师实施麻醉。患者被随机分配至MRasp组(n = 18)或LGsp组(n = 18)。观察指标包括进针尝试次数、调整进针方向尝试次数、穿刺针通过次数、首次进针成功的比例、首次穿刺针通过成功的比例、脊髓穿刺时间、整个操作时间以及围手术期并发症的发生率。

结果

MRasp组的进针尝试中位数显著少于LGsp组(1.0 对比2.0,P = 0.023)。MRasp组首次进针成功的患者比例为72.2%,LGsp组为44.4%(P = 0.176)。两组围手术期并发症的发生率无显著差异。

结论

这项前瞻性研究发现,在为老年患者实施脊髓麻醉时,与LGsp组相比,MRasp组新手从业者的进针尝试次数显著减少。有必要开展一项未来的随机对照试验(RCT)以验证其有效性。

试验注册

本试验已在https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=178960(ChiCTR-IPR-2300068520)注册。公开标题:老年患者混合现实辅助与体表标志引导脊髓穿刺的随机对照前瞻性研究。主要研究者:高雷。注册日期为2023年2月22日。首例受试者入组日期为2023年2月27日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c4c/11334921/f7b76b3064be/JPR-17-2701-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验