• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物统计学中的常见错误。

Common mistakes in biostatistics.

作者信息

D'Arrigo Graziella, El Hafeez Samar Abd, Mezzatesta Sabrina, Abelardo Domenico, Provenzano Fabio Pasquale, Vilasi Antonio, Torino Claudia, Tripepi Giovanni

机构信息

CNR-IFC, Institute of Clinical Physiology of Reggio Calabria, Italy.

Epidemiology Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jun 26;17(7):sfae197. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae197. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae197
PMID:39165900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333961/
Abstract

Biostatistics plays a pivotal role in developing, interpreting and drawing conclusions from clinical, biological and epidemiological data. However, the improper application of statistical methods can lead to erroneous conclusions and misinterpretations. This paper provides a comprehensive examination of the most frequent mistakes encountered in the biostatistical analysis process. We identified and elucidated 10 common errors in biostatistical analysis. These include using the wrong metric to describe data, misinterpreting -values, misinterpreting the 95% confidence interval, misinterpreting the hazard ratio as an index of prognostic accuracy, ignoring the sample size calculation, misinterpreting analysis by strata in randomized clinical trials, confusing correlation and causation, misunderstanding confounders and mediators, inadequately codifying variables during the data collection, and bias arising when group membership is attributed on the basis of future exposure in retrospective studies. We discuss the implications of these errors and propose some practical strategies to mitigate their impact. By raising awareness of these pitfalls, this paper aims to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of biostatistical analyses, thereby fostering more robust and reliable biomedical research findings.

摘要

生物统计学在临床、生物学和流行病学数据的开发、解释以及得出结论方面发挥着关键作用。然而,统计方法的不当应用可能导致错误的结论和误解。本文全面审视了生物统计学分析过程中最常出现的错误。我们识别并阐明了生物统计学分析中的10个常见错误。这些错误包括使用错误的指标来描述数据、错误解读P值、错误解读95%置信区间、将风险比错误解读为预后准确性指标、忽略样本量计算、错误解读随机临床试验中的分层分析、混淆相关性和因果关系、误解混杂因素和中介变量、在数据收集过程中对变量编码不充分,以及在回顾性研究中根据未来暴露情况确定分组时产生的偏差。我们讨论了这些错误的影响,并提出了一些切实可行的策略来减轻其影响。通过提高对这些陷阱的认识,本文旨在增强生物统计学分析的严谨性和可重复性,从而促进更稳健、可靠的生物医学研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/bd6471c5018d/sfae197fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/7f33ee1c7613/sfae197fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/ed678044073c/sfae197fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/bd6471c5018d/sfae197fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/7f33ee1c7613/sfae197fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/ed678044073c/sfae197fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcdd/11333961/bd6471c5018d/sfae197fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Common mistakes in biostatistics.生物统计学中的常见错误。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jun 26;17(7):sfae197. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae197. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Critical Appraisal Skills Among Canadian Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents: How Do They Fare?加拿大妇产科住院医师的批判性评估技能:他们的表现如何?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Jul;37(7):639-647. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30203-6.
3
Canadian-led capacity-building in biostatistics and methodology in cardiovascular and diabetes trials: the CANNeCTIN Biostatistics and Methodological Innovation Working Group.加拿大主导的心血管和糖尿病临床试验中的生物统计学和方法学能力建设:CANNeCTIN 生物统计学和方法学创新工作组。
Trials. 2011 Feb 18;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-48.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Statistics in medical research: Common mistakes.医学研究中的统计学:常见错误。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 May 6;18(6):1197-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.04.004. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
The biostatistical minimum.生物统计学最小值
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):4131-4132. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.94.
8
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍
9
Fundamentals in Biostatistics for Investigation in Pediatric Dentistry: Part II -Biostatistical Methods.儿童牙科研究中的生物统计学基础:第二部分 - 生物统计学方法
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(3):173-178. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.3.173.
10
An Interactive Module to Teach Common Biostatistical Tests to Learners in the Health Professions.一个用于向健康专业学习者教授常见生物统计学检验的交互式模块。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36125. eCollection 2023 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
A review to determine regulatorily and reimbursement successes of studies conducted using data from Canadian patient support programs based on the real-world evidence guidelines published by Canadian drug agency and health Canada.一项审查,旨在根据加拿大药品管理局和加拿大卫生部发布的真实世界证据指南,确定使用加拿大患者支持项目数据进行的研究在监管和报销方面的成功情况。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2025 Aug 8;28:14587. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2025.14587. eCollection 2025.
2
A simple guide to the use of Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test in biostatistics.生物统计学中使用学生t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验、卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验的简易指南。
BioData Min. 2025 Aug 20;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Defining measures of kidney function in observational studies using routine health care data: methodological and reporting considerations.在使用常规医疗保健数据的观察性研究中定义肾功能测量指标:方法学与报告考量
Kidney Int. 2023 Jan;103(1):53-69. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.09.020. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
A systematic review of statistical methodology used to evaluate progression of chronic kidney disease using electronic healthcare records.使用电子医疗记录评估慢性肾脏病进展的统计方法的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 29;17(7):e0264167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264167. eCollection 2022.
3
Methods to Analyze Time-to-Event Data: The Cox Regression Analysis.
Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the Triglyceride-Glucose Index in Different Populations: A Critical Analysis.
评估不同人群中甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数的预后价值:一项批判性分析。
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 24;17(7):1124. doi: 10.3390/nu17071124.
4
The cornerstones of randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验的基石。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May;57(5):1555-1561. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04307-y. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
分析事件时间数据的方法:Cox 回归分析。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021 Nov 30;2021:1302811. doi: 10.1155/2021/1302811. eCollection 2021.
4
Immortal Time Bias in Observational Studies.观察性研究中的不朽时间偏倚
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):686-687. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9151.
5
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
6
Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Importance of Observed Effect Sizes: What Do P Values and Confidence Intervals Really Represent?观察效应大小的统计学意义与临床重要性:P 值和置信区间真正代表什么?
Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1068-1072. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002798.
7
Varieties of Confidence Intervals.置信区间的种类
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jun 30;13(2):140-155. doi: 10.5709/acp-0214-z. eCollection 2017.
8
Effect modification, interaction and mediation: an overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators.效应修饰、交互作用和中介作用:临床研究者理论见解概述
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 8;9:331-338. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S129728. eCollection 2017.
9
Specifying a target trial prevents immortal time bias and other self-inflicted injuries in observational analyses.指定目标试验可防止观察性分析中出现不朽时间偏倚和其他自伤性偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能:误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.