Cheng Peng, Fan Yongqin, Tang Houtian, Liu Ke, Wu Shiman, Zhu Gaoli, Jiang Ping, Guo Weili
School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, 430205, Hubei Province, China.
School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian Province, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35227. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35227. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
Based on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science (WOS) databases, this article analyzes the deductive context, cooperation network, and research hotspots of land development rights (LDR) research in the Chinese and international literature by using CiteSpace software, and it also explores the implications of this research for the theory and practice of national territory spatial planning (NTSP) in China. The results show that (1) the literature on LDR in Chinese and international journal articles initially appeared in 1995 and 1973, respectively, researches in China experienced three stages: embryonic fluctuating development, rapid growth and stable development, and wave development, while international researches experienced two stages: embryonic fluctuating and a gradually increasing development. (2) Among these scholars and research institutions, there is no obvious difference between Chinese and international scholars, while the Renmin University of China and the State University System of Florida are the research institutions with the largest number of Chinese and international journal articles, respectively. (3) In terms of publishing journals, international journals mainly focus on land policy, cities, and resource fields, while Chinese journals mainly focus on the agricultural economy, civil and commercial law, economic systems, and macroeconomic management fields. (4) The direction and scale of thematic research vary greatly, with Chinese research mainly conducted from the perspectives of rights attribution and benefits distribution, while international research mainly focuses on the operation of the right-to-development system and its impact on the environment. In the future, studies focus on China's need to strengthen the research and institutional practice of LDR at the legal level, value level, and extension level following national conditions, formulate a land value-added benefit distribution system with efficiency and fairness, and strengthen the practice of LDR in China's NTSP based on the differences between urban and rural development.
基于中国知网（CNKI）和科学网（WOS）数据库，本文运用CiteSpace软件分析了中国和国际文献中土地发展权（LDR）研究的演绎背景、合作网络和研究热点，并探讨了该研究对中国国土空间规划（NTSP）理论与实践的启示。研究结果表明：（1）中国和国际期刊文章中关于土地发展权的文献最初分别出现在1995年和1973年，中国的研究经历了三个阶段：萌芽波动发展、快速增长与稳定发展以及波动发展，而国际研究经历了两个阶段：萌芽波动和逐渐增长发展。（2）在这些学者和研究机构中，中国学者和国际学者之间没有明显差异，而中国人民大学和佛罗里达州立大学系统分别是发表中国和国际期刊文章数量最多的研究机构。（3）在出版期刊方面，国际期刊主要集中在土地政策、城市和资源领域，而中国期刊主要集中在农业经济、民商法、经济体制和宏观经济管理领域。（4）主题研究的方向和规模差异很大，中国的研究主要从权利归属和利益分配的角度进行，而国际研究主要关注发展权制度的运作及其对环境的影响。未来，研究聚焦于中国需要根据国情在法律层面、价值层面和拓展层面加强土地发展权的研究和制度实践，制定一个兼顾效率与公平的土地增值收益分配体系，并基于城乡发展差异加强土地发展权在中国国土空间规划中的实践。
