School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China; College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 1;285:112054. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112054. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Cropland protection strategies have provided a strong contribution to limit cropland transformation worldwide. However, it negatively affects ecological land (e.g., forest, grassland, and wetland). Identifying a win-win approach for cropland protection and ecological conservation is important. Land use optimization plays a vital role in solving conflicts among land uses. Thus, in this research, taking China (mainland) as the study area, we optimized the spatial distribution of urban land and cropland to balance the requirement of cropland protection strategies and their negative effects on ecological land according to the spatial heterogeneity of land agricultural production capacity by using the LAND System Cellular Automata model for Potential Effects (LANDSCAPE). Specifically, we developed three optimization scenarios from compensational, occupancy, and occupancy and compensational sectors. We also developed one non-optimization scenario to remain comparable. Results show that compared with the non-optimization scenario, the reduced loss of ecological land in compensational, occupancy, and occupancy and compensational optimization scenario is 7180, 247, and 7277 km, respectively. Our research indicates that we should prioritize the quality of compensated cropland when developing cropland protection strategies and planning, considering the low efficiency of the occupancy optimization and the cost of policymaking and implementing.
耕地保护策略为限制世界范围内的耕地转变做出了重要贡献。然而,它对生态用地(如森林、草地和湿地)产生了负面影响。找到耕地保护和生态保护的双赢方法很重要。土地利用优化在解决土地利用冲突方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,在本研究中,以中国大陆为研究区域,我们利用土地系统元胞自动机模型(LANDSCAPE)对耕地的空间分布进行了优化,以平衡耕地保护策略的需求及其对生态用地的负面影响,同时考虑到土地农业生产能力的空间异质性。具体来说,我们从补偿、占用和占用与补偿部门制定了三个优化方案。我们还制定了一个非优化方案来进行比较。结果表明,与非优化方案相比,补偿、占用和占用与补偿优化方案中生态用地的损失减少了 7180、247 和 7277 公里。我们的研究表明,在制定耕地保护策略和规划时,应优先考虑耕地补偿的质量,同时考虑到占用优化的低效率以及政策制定和实施的成本。