Ishizaka Keisuke, Moriya Koji, Kuroda Takuma, Koda Hisao, Tsubokawa Naoto, Maki Yutaka
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata Hand Surgery Foundation, Kitakambara, Japan.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 May 22;6(4):567-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.04.014. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Preiser disease is difficult to diagnose and treat because of its unclear pathophysiology. Although both nonsurgical treatment and surgical treatment for Preiser disease have been reported, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment because of its rarity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between treatment selection and characteristics of patients with Preiser disease.
This single-institution retrospective chart review included nine patients (two men and seven women) with Preiser disease who were treated at our hospital. We divided patients into two groups consisting of elderly (older than 65 years of age) and nonelderly patients. Herbert-Lanzetta classification, presence of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI), Watson classification based on plain radiography, Kalainov classification based on magnetic resonance imaging, and treatment modalities were investigated in both groups.
In the elderly group, three of five cases were in advanced stages of Preiser disease according to the Herbert-Lanzetta classification. Three wrists had a DISI deformity. Three patients underwent conservative treatment. The two remaining cases classified as Herbert-Lanzetta stage II underwent closing radial wedge osteotomy. In the nonelderly group, three of four cases were in the early stages of Preiser disease according to the Herbert-Lanzetta classification. One wrist had a DISI deformity. Two patients were treated conservatively. The other two patients were surgically treated using closing radial wedge osteotomy in one case and vascularized bone graft from the second metacarpal base in another case, both classified as Herbert-Lanzetta stage II.
Most elderly patients with Preiser disease showed concurrent DISI at the time of initial presentation and advanced stage. Most elderly patients underwent nonsurgical treatment. Even when surgical treatment is implemented, our study suggests that the less invasive and optimal treatment is closing radial wedge osteotomy.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
由于佩里塞尔病的病理生理学尚不清楚,其诊断和治疗都很困难。尽管已经报道了佩里塞尔病的非手术治疗和手术治疗方法,但由于其罕见性,对于最佳治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是探讨佩里塞尔病患者的治疗选择与特征之间的关系。
这项单机构回顾性病历审查纳入了在我院接受治疗的9例佩里塞尔病患者(2例男性和7例女性)。我们将患者分为老年组(年龄大于65岁)和非老年组。对两组患者进行了赫伯特-兰泽塔分类、背侧插入节段不稳定(DISI)的存在情况、基于X线平片的沃森分类、基于磁共振成像的卡拉伊诺夫分类以及治疗方式的研究。
在老年组中,根据赫伯特-兰泽塔分类,5例中有3例处于佩里塞尔病的晚期。3例手腕存在DISI畸形。3例患者接受了保守治疗。其余2例分类为赫伯特-兰泽塔II期的患者接受了闭合性桡骨楔形截骨术。在非老年组中,根据赫伯特-兰泽塔分类,4例中有3例处于佩里塞尔病的早期。1例手腕存在DISI畸形。2例患者接受了保守治疗。另外2例患者接受了手术治疗,1例采用闭合性桡骨楔形截骨术,另1例采用来自第二掌骨基底的带血管骨移植,这2例均分类为赫伯特-兰泽塔II期。
大多数患有佩里塞尔病的老年患者在初次就诊时表现为并发DISI且处于晚期。大多数老年患者接受了非手术治疗。即使实施手术治疗,我们的研究表明,侵入性较小的最佳治疗方法是闭合性桡骨楔形截骨术。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV级。