Suppr超能文献

公共卫生中个体追踪项目的使用:一个生命伦理学困境。

The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma.

机构信息

Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais. Araçuaí, Minas Gerais. Brazil.

Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros. Montes Claros, Minas Gerais. Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Aug 19;77Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20230041. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to understand the bioethical perspectives on mobile tracking device use.

METHODS

theoretical study based on action research, carried out with eight graduate students from a public university. A focus group was used, with a thematic content analysis methodology with a codebook structure, approved by the Research Ethics Committee.

RESULTS

from the analysis, there was a concern about using devices after the pandemic ended. Using or not the device, rights inherent to humans, legislation and effectiveness of methods deepen interpretations, moving participants from a personalistic conception of the topic to a vision focused on professional implications about the methods.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

the debate on the impact of using technological devices on health, especially those that imply restriction of rights that refer to individuals' private life, involves a discussion of a professional nature, in addition to requirement for clear rules on the topic.

摘要

目的

了解移动追踪设备使用的生物伦理观点。

方法

基于行动研究的理论研究,与一所公立大学的八名研究生合作完成。使用了焦点小组,采用主题内容分析方法和带有代码簿结构,并获得了研究伦理委员会的批准。

结果

从分析中可以看出,人们担心大流行结束后会使用设备。使用或不使用该设备,涉及到人类固有的权利、立法和方法的有效性,加深了对该主题的解释,使参与者从主题的个人主义观念转变为关注方法对专业影响的视角。

最终考虑

关于使用技术设备对健康的影响的争论,特别是那些涉及限制个人私人生活权利的设备,涉及到一个专业性的讨论,除了需要在这个话题上有明确的规则。

相似文献

1
The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma.公共卫生中个体追踪项目的使用:一个生命伦理学困境。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Aug 19;77Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20230041. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041. eCollection 2024.
3
Examining American bioethics: its problems and prospects.审视美国生物伦理学:其问题与前景。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2005 Fall;14(4):361-73. doi: 10.1017/s0963180105050504.
7
[Bioethics and Brazilian health policies].[生物伦理学与巴西卫生政策]
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):121-8, 199. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0121.
8
Do-not-resuscitate order in COVID-19 times: bioethics and professional ethics.COVID-19 时期的不复苏医嘱:生命伦理学与职业道德。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2021 Sep 13;42(spe):e20200172. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200172. eCollection 2021.
10
Reporting on the First National Bioethics Conference.关于首届全国生物伦理学会议的报告。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2006 Jan-Mar;3(1):27-30. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2006.011.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of nursing teaching in the use of education technology: a scoping review.教育技术在护理教学中的应用演变:范围综述。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 May 21;74(suppl 5):e20200422. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0422. eCollection 2021.
4
5
Mass surveillance in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的大规模监控。
J Law Biosci. 2020 May 8;7(1):lsaa023. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa023. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
7
Personal data usage and privacy considerations in the COVID-19 global pandemic.新冠疫情全球大流行中的个人数据使用与隐私考量
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Jun;25(suppl 1):2487-2492. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.11792020. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.新冠病毒追踪应用程序的伦理准则。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验