Suppr超能文献

接触者追踪应用程序的伦理和价值:国际视角及其对苏格兰 COVID-19 应对措施的影响。

The ethics and value of contact tracing apps: International insights and implications for Scotland's COVID-19 response.

机构信息

Usher Institute/Edinburgh Global Health Academy, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020103. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020103.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has put health systems, economies and societies under unprecedented strain, calling for innovative approaches. Scotland's government, like those elsewhere, is facing difficult decisions about how to deploy digital technologies and data to help contain, control and manage the disease, while also respecting citizens' rights. This paper explores the ethical challenges presented by these methods, with particular emphasis on mobile apps associated with contact tracing. Drawing on UK and international experiences, it examines issues such as public trust, data privacy and technology design; how changing disease threats and contextual factors can affect the balance between public benefits and risks; and the importance of transparency, accountability and stakeholder participation for the trustworthiness and good-governance of digital systems and strategies. Analysis of recent technology debates, controversial programmes and emerging outcomes in comparable countries implementing contact tracing apps, reveals sociotechnical complexities and unexpected paradoxes that warrant further study and underlines the need for holistic, inclusive and adaptive strategies. The paper also considers the potential role of these apps as Scotland transitions to the 'new normal', outlines challenges and opportunities for public engagement, and poses a set of ethical questions to inform decision-making at multiple levels, from software design to institutional governance.

摘要

新冠疫情给卫生系统、经济和社会带来了前所未有的压力,需要创新的应对方法。苏格兰政府与其他地区的政府一样,正面临着艰难的决策,即如何部署数字技术和数据,以帮助控制、管理疾病,同时尊重公民的权利。本文探讨了这些方法带来的伦理挑战,特别强调了与接触者追踪相关的移动应用程序。本文借鉴了英国和国际经验,研究了公众信任、数据隐私和技术设计等问题;疾病威胁和背景因素的变化如何影响公共利益和风险之间的平衡;以及透明度、问责制和利益相关者参与对于数字系统和策略的可信度和良好治理的重要性。对最近的技术辩论、有争议的项目和类似国家实施接触者追踪应用程序的新兴结果的分析揭示了社会技术的复杂性和意想不到的悖论,这需要进一步研究,并强调了需要采取整体、包容和适应的策略。本文还考虑了这些应用程序在苏格兰向“新常态”过渡时的潜在作用,概述了公众参与的挑战和机遇,并提出了一系列伦理问题,以便在从软件设计到机构治理的多个层面上为决策提供信息。

相似文献

4
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.新冠病毒追踪应用程序的伦理准则。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.
9
Audio Interview: Covid-19 and Contact Tracing.音频访谈:新冠疫情与接触者追踪
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 20;383(8):e73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2028055.

引用本文的文献

2
Ethics of Wearable-Based Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection.可穿戴式院外心脏骤停检测的伦理学。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep;17(9):e012913. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012913. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma.公共卫生中个体追踪项目的使用:一个生命伦理学困境。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Aug 19;77Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20230041. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041. eCollection 2024.
9
COVID-19 surveillance systems in African countries.非洲国家的新冠病毒监测系统。
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Dec 19;11(4):382-392. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.49. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

4
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.新冠病毒追踪应用程序的伦理准则。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.
6
New Zealand eliminates COVID-19.新西兰消除了新冠病毒。
Lancet. 2020 May 9;395(10235):1474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31097-7.
10
Digital Participatory Surveillance and the Zika Crisis: Opportunities and Caveats.数字参与式监测与寨卡危机:机遇与警示
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 13;10(6):e0004795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004795. eCollection 2016 Jun.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验