• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于供体移植物与受体匹配情况评估肝移植术后结局的简要模型。

A Brief Model Evaluated Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Based on the Matching of Donor Graft and Recipient.

作者信息

Li Yuancheng, Liu Xingchao, Zhang Chengcheng, Tao Ran, Pan Bi, Liu Wei, Jiang Di, Hu Feng, Xu Zeliang, Tan Dehong, Ou Yanjiao, Li Xun, You Yuemei, Zhang Leida

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 1;16(1):e00761. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000761.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000761
PMID:39166764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11756882/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A precise model for predicting outcomes is needed to guide perioperative management. With the development of the liver transplantation (LT) discipline, previous models may become inappropriate or noncomprehensive. Thus, we aimed to develop a novel model integrating variables from donors and recipients for quick assessment of transplant outcomes.

METHODS

The risk model was based on Cox regression in a randomly selected derivation cohort and verified in a validation cohort. Perioperative data and overall survival were compared between stratifications grouped by X-tile. Receiver-operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were used to compare the models. Violin and raincloud plots were generated to present post-LT complications distributed in different stratifications.

RESULTS

Overall, 528 patients receiving LT from 2 centers were included with 2/3 in the derivation cohort and 1/3 in the validation cohort. Cox regression analysis showed that cold ischemia time (CIT) ( P = 0.012) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ( P = 0.007) score were predictors of survival. After comparison with the logarithmic models, the primitive algorithms of CIT and MELD were defined as the CIT-MELD Index (CMI). CMI was stratified by X-tile (grade 1 ≤1.06, 1.06 < grade 2 ≤ 1.87, grade 3 >1.87). In both cohorts, CMI performed better in calculating transplant outcomes than the balance of risk score, including perioperative incidents and prevalence of complications.

DISCUSSION

The model integrating variables from graft donors and recipients made the prediction more accurate and available. CMI provided new insight into outcome evaluation and risk factor management of LT.

摘要

引言

需要一个精确的模型来预测结果,以指导围手术期管理。随着肝移植(LT)学科的发展,以前的模型可能变得不合适或不全面。因此,我们旨在开发一种整合供体和受体变量的新型模型,以快速评估移植结果。

方法

风险模型基于随机选择的推导队列中的Cox回归,并在验证队列中进行验证。通过X-tile分组的分层之间比较围手术期数据和总生存率。使用受试者操作特征曲线和决策曲线分析来比较模型。生成小提琴图和雨云图以展示LT术后并发症在不同分层中的分布情况。

结果

总体而言,纳入了来自2个中心的528例接受LT的患者,其中2/3在推导队列中,1/3在验证队列中。Cox回归分析表明,冷缺血时间(CIT)(P = 0.012)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分(P = 0.007)是生存的预测因素。与对数模型比较后,CIT和MELD的原始算法被定义为CIT-MELD指数(CMI)。CMI通过X-tile进行分层(1级≤1.06,1.06<2级≤1.87,3级>1.87)。在两个队列中,CMI在计算移植结果方面比风险评分平衡表现更好,包括围手术期事件和并发症发生率。

讨论

整合来自移植物供体和受体变量的模型使预测更加准确和可用。CMI为LT的结果评估和危险因素管理提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/28e1f437bd79/ct9-16-e00761-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/d61ba61c78dc/ct9-16-e00761-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/07180dbd841e/ct9-16-e00761-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/90a8473e44d8/ct9-16-e00761-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/eba762654b15/ct9-16-e00761-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/07c9493dde12/ct9-16-e00761-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/28e1f437bd79/ct9-16-e00761-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/d61ba61c78dc/ct9-16-e00761-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/07180dbd841e/ct9-16-e00761-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/90a8473e44d8/ct9-16-e00761-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/eba762654b15/ct9-16-e00761-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/07c9493dde12/ct9-16-e00761-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cea/11756882/28e1f437bd79/ct9-16-e00761-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A Brief Model Evaluated Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Based on the Matching of Donor Graft and Recipient.一种基于供体移植物与受体匹配情况评估肝移植术后结局的简要模型。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 1;16(1):e00761. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000761.
2
Effects of Donor Age and Cold Ischemia on Liver Transplantation Outcomes According to the Severity of Recipient Status.根据受体状态严重程度,供体年龄和冷缺血对肝移植结局的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Feb;61(2):626-35. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3910-7.
3
Expansion of the Liver Donor Supply Through Greater Use of Split-Liver Transplantation: Identifying Optimal Recipients.通过更多地使用劈离式肝移植扩大肝脏供体供应:确定最佳受者。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Jan;25(1):119-127. doi: 10.1002/lt.25340.
4
The corrected donor age for hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients.丙型肝炎病毒感染的肝移植受者的校正供体年龄。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Aug;21(8):1022-30. doi: 10.1002/lt.24194.
5
Performance of risk prediction models for post-liver transplant patient and graft survival over time.肝移植术后患者及移植物随时间推移的风险预测模型性能。
Liver Transpl. 2024 Jul 1;30(7):689-698. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000326. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Artificial intelligence for predicting survival following deceased donor liver transplantation: Retrospective multi-center study.人工智能预测脑死亡供肝移植术后患者的生存情况:回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106838. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106838. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Does Donor Allograft Microsteatosis Matter? Comparison of Outcomes in Liver Transplantation With a Propensity-Matched Cohort.供体同种异体脂肪变性是否重要?采用倾向匹配队列的肝移植患者结局比较。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Oct;25(10):1533-1540. doi: 10.1002/lt.25583. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Technique and outcome of domino liver transplantation from patients with maple syrup urine disease: Expanding the donor pool for live donor liver transplantation.枫糖尿症患者多米诺式肝移植的技术和结果:扩大活体肝移植供体池。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Nov;33(11):e13721. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13721. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
9
Exploring the Viability of Matching Marginal Donors With Low Renal Function Recipients in Liver Transplantation.探索在肝移植中匹配边缘供体与肾功能低下受者的可行性。
Clin Transplant. 2025 Mar;39(3):e70123. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70123.
10
Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.通过供体和受体特征的策略性匹配优化再次肝移植移植物的效用。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/lt.24138.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence for predicting survival following deceased donor liver transplantation: Retrospective multi-center study.人工智能预测脑死亡供肝移植术后患者的生存情况:回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106838. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106838. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
2
Analysis of outcomes and renal recovery after adult living-donor liver transplantation among recipients with hepatorenal syndrome.肝性肾功能衰竭患者接受成人活体肝移植后的结局和肾功能恢复分析。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2381-2391. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17105. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Machine perfusion in liver transplantation.
肝移植中的机器灌注
Hepatology. 2022 Nov;76(5):1531-1549. doi: 10.1002/hep.32546. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Liver.OPTN/SRTR 2020 年度数据报告:肝脏。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22 Suppl 2:204-309. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16978.
5
Postreperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation: Outcomes, predictors, and application for recipient selection.肝移植后再灌注综合征:结局、预测因素及其在受体选择中的应用。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Apr;36(4):e14587. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14587. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Contemporary strategies to assess and manage liver donor steatosis: a review.当代评估和管理肝供体脂肪变性的策略:综述。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021 Oct 1;26(5):474-481. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000893.
7
Comparison of transient elastography and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium alone to predict mortality and liver transplantation.瞬时弹性成像与终末期肝病模型钠联合模型与终末期肝病模型钠单独预测死亡率和肝移植的比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(1S Suppl 1):e753-e757. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002243.
8
Defining Surgical Difficulty of Liver Transplantation.定义肝移植手术的难度。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):144-150. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005017. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
9
Short recipient warm ischemia time improves outcomes in deceased donor liver transplantation.缩短受体热缺血时间可改善尸体供肝移植的预后。
Transpl Int. 2021 Aug;34(8):1422-1432. doi: 10.1111/tri.13962. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Factors Associated With Access to and Receipt of Liver Transplantation in Veterans With End-stage Liver Disease.与终末期肝病退伍军人获得肝移植和接受肝移植相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):949-959. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2051.