Zhang Tian, Tan Alan, Shah Amishi Y, Iyer Gopa, Morris Valerie, Michaud Sébastien, Sridhar Srikala S
Department of Internal Medicine, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Oncologist. 2024 Dec 6;29(12):1003-1013. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae215.
Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line (1L) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) for decades, based on the proven efficacy and established safety profiles of cisplatin- and carboplatin-based regimens. With the emergence of novel regimens, it is important to reevaluate and contextualize the role of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab 1L maintenance in patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy was established as a standard 1L regimen based on the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III trial. More recently, the EV-302 phase III trial showed the superiority of 1L enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy, and the Checkmate 901 phase III trial showed the superiority of 1L nivolumab + cisplatin/gemcitabine versus cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. These 2 regimens have now been included as standard 1L options in treatment guidelines for advanced UC. EV + pembrolizumab is now the preferred 1L treatment, and in locations where EV + pembrolizumab is not available or individual patients are not considered suitable, recommended options are platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance or nivolumab + cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for advanced UC recommended in guidelines, practical considerations with platinum-based chemotherapy, the role of avelumab 1L maintenance, recent phase III trials of EV + pembrolizumab and nivolumab + cisplatin/gemcitabine, safety profiles of recommended 1L treatments, and second-line treatment options.
几十年来,基于顺铂和卡铂方案已证实的疗效和既定的安全性,铂类化疗一直是晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)的标准一线(1L)治疗方法。随着新方案的出现,重新评估和界定1L铂类化疗的作用很重要。基于JAVELIN Bladder 100 III期试验,铂类化疗后在铂类化疗后无疾病进展的患者中使用阿维鲁单抗进行1L维持治疗被确立为标准的1L方案。最近,EV-302 III期试验显示1L恩杂鲁胺(EV)+帕博利珠单抗优于铂类化疗,Checkmate 901 III期试验显示1L纳武利尤单抗+顺铂/吉西他滨优于单纯顺铂/吉西他滨。这两种方案现已被纳入晚期UC治疗指南的标准1L选择。EV+帕博利珠单抗现在是首选的1L治疗方法,在无法获得EV+帕博利珠单抗或个别患者被认为不适合的地区,推荐的选择是铂类化疗后进行阿维鲁单抗维持治疗或纳武利尤单抗+基于顺铂的化疗。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了指南中推荐的晚期UC的当前治疗选择、铂类化疗的实际考虑因素、阿维鲁单抗1L维持治疗的作用、EV+帕博利珠单抗和纳武利尤单抗+顺铂/吉西他滨的近期III期试验、推荐的1L治疗的安全性概况以及二线治疗选择。