Suppr超能文献

轻负荷卧推训练中速度损失的影响。

Effects of Velocity Loss During Bench-Press Training With Light Relative Loads.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement and Sport Performance, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Science-Based Training Research Group, Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Aug 21;19(10):1076-1086. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0529. Print 2024 Oct 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study explored the effects of 4 bench-press (BP) training programs with different velocity-loss (VL) thresholds (0%, 15%, 25%, and 50%) on strength gains and neuromuscular adaptations.

METHODS

Forty-six resistance-trained men (22.8 [4.4] y) were randomly assigned into 4 groups that differed in the VL allowed within the set: 0% (VL0), 15% (VL15), 25% (VL25), and 50% (VL50). Training loads (40%-55% 1-repetition maximum), frequency (2 sessions/wk), number of sets (3), and interset recovery (4 min) were identical for all groups. Participants completed the following tests before and after an 8-week (16-session) BP training program: (1) maximal isometric test, (2) progressive loading test, and (3) fatigue test in the BP exercise. During all tests, triceps brachii muscle electromyography was assessed.

RESULTS

After completing the resistance-training program, no significant group × time interactions were noticed for isometric and dynamic BP strength variables. The dose-response relationship exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship pattern, with VL25 showing the greatest effect sizes for almost all strength variables analyzed. The total number of repetitions performed during the training program increased as the VL magnitude increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The group that trained with high VL threshold (50%), which performed a total of 876 repetitions, did not experience additional strength gains compared with those experienced by the 0%, 15%, and 25% of VL groups, which performed significantly fewer repetitions (48, 357, and 547, respectively). These findings suggest that when light loads (40%-55% 1-repetition maximum) are used, low and moderate VL thresholds (0%-25%) provide a higher training efficiency.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了 4 种不同速度损失(VL)阈值(0%、15%、25%和 50%)的卧推(BP)训练方案对力量增长和神经肌肉适应性的影响。

方法

46 名有经验的男性(22.8[4.4]岁)被随机分配到 4 个组,每组在组内允许的 VL 不同:0%(VL0)、15%(VL15)、25%(VL25)和 50%(VL50)。所有组的训练负荷(40%-55%1 次重复最大)、频率(2 次/周)、组数(3 组)和组间恢复(4 分钟)均相同。参与者在 8 周(16 节)BP 训练计划前后完成以下测试:(1)最大等长测试,(2)渐进加载测试,(3)BP 运动中的疲劳测试。在所有测试中,肱三头肌肌电图均进行评估。

结果

在完成抗阻训练计划后,等长和动态 BP 力量变量的组×时间交互作用不显著。剂量反应关系呈现出倒 U 形关系模式,VL25 对几乎所有分析的力量变量的效果大小最大。随着 VL 幅度的增加,训练计划中完成的总重复次数增加。

结论

与 0%、15%和 25%VL 组相比,使用高 VL 阈值(50%)训练的组(总共完成 876 次重复)并未获得额外的力量增益,而这些组完成的重复次数明显较少(分别为 48、357 和 547)。这些发现表明,当使用轻负荷(40%-55%1 次重复最大)时,低和中 VL 阈值(0%-25%)提供更高的训练效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验