Biswas Saikat, Das Rupa, Jana Kalyan, Puste Anandamoy
Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, 741252, India.
Division of Agriculture, Faculty Centre of Agriculture, Rural and Tribal Development, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, Morabadi, Ranchi, Jharkhand, 834008, India.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 21;14(1):19414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66107-9.
A field investigation took place at Central Research Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India during winter seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 with the aim to evaluate system productivity, economics, energetics and carbon footprint (CF) of oat + grasspea intercropping systems under different integrated nutrient managements (INM). The experiment was executed in split-plot design with 4 cropping systems in main plots and 4 levels of nutrient management in sub plots. The 3:3 intercropping system of oat + grasspea ensured highest system productivity, whereas sole grasspea stood best in terms of economics, energetics and environment safety by lowering CF. Notably, INM involving 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost registered significantly higher system productivity in case of 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system (CSN) (18.77 q ha). Further, this intercropping system yielded high economic profitability (net return: US$ 430.4 ha, benefit-cost ratio: 1.71) as well as energy indices (energy output: 71179.1 MJ ha, net energy gain: 60352.0 MJ ha, energy ratio: 6.57 and energy profitability: 5.57). CF was also found relatively low under CSN (Yield scaled CF: 62.2 kg CO-e q). Furthermore, high carbon efficiency (7.92) and carbon sustainability index (6.92) were also exhibited by CSN as it produced maximum carbon output (1801.2 kg ha). In conclusion, the 3:3 oat + grasspea intercropping system using INM can be viable option to ensure economic and energy viability and minimize greenhouse gas emissions without compromising system productivity. Particularly, this intercropping system combined with 75% N through urea + 25% N through vermicompost as INM option can be recommended for the cereal and legume growers of India, specifically under intensive cropping scenario.
2020 - 21年和2021 - 22年冬季,在印度西孟加拉邦比丹·钱德拉·克里希维迪耶拉亚中央研究农场进行了一项田间调查,旨在评估不同综合养分管理(INM)下燕麦+鹰嘴豆间作系统的系统生产力、经济性、能量学和碳足迹(CF)。试验采用裂区设计,主区设置4种种植系统,副区设置4种养分管理水平。燕麦+鹰嘴豆3:3间作系统确保了最高的系统生产力,而单作鹰嘴豆在经济性、能量学和环境安全性方面表现最佳,通过降低碳足迹实现。值得注意的是,在3:3燕麦+鹰嘴豆间作系统(CSN)中,通过尿素提供75%的氮+通过蚯蚓堆肥提供25%的氮的INM方式,系统生产力显著更高(18.77公担/公顷)。此外,这种间作系统产生了较高的经济盈利能力(净收益:430.4美元/公顷,效益成本比:1.71)以及能量指标(能量产出:71179.1兆焦/公顷,净能量增益:60352.0兆焦/公顷,能量比:6.57,能量盈利能力:5.57)。在CSN下还发现碳足迹相对较低(产量缩放后的CF:62.2千克二氧化碳当量/公顷)。此外,CSN还表现出高碳效率(7.92)和碳可持续性指数(6.92),因为它产生了最大的碳输出(1801.2千克/公顷)。总之,采用INM的3:3燕麦+鹰嘴豆间作系统可以成为确保经济和能源可行性并在不影响系统生产力的情况下减少温室气体排放的可行选择。特别是,这种间作系统与通过尿素提供75%的氮+通过蚯蚓堆肥提供25%的氮作为INM选项相结合,可以推荐给印度的谷物和豆类种植者,特别是在集约化种植情况下。