Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 21;23(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02249-6.
Healthcare triage policies are vital for allocating limited resources fairly and equitably. Despite extensive studies of healthcare equity, consensus on the applied definition of equity in triage remains elusive. This study aimed to investigate how the principles of equity are operationalised in Australian hospital physiotherapy triage tools to guide resource distribution.
A retrospective, qualitative content analysis of 13 triage policies from 10 hospitals across Australia was conducted. Triage policies from both inpatient and outpatient settings were sourced. Data were coded deductively using the five discrete domains of the multi-faceted operational definition of health equity posited by Lane et al. (2017): 1) point of equalisation in the health service supply/access/outcome chain, 2) need or potential to benefit, 3) groupings of equalisation, 4) caveats to equalisation, 5) close enough is good enough. Descriptive summative statistics were used to analyse and present the frequency of reported equity domains.
Within the included triage tools, four out of five domains of equity were evident in the included documents to guide decision making. Allocation based on perceived patient need and overall health outcomes were the central guiding principles across both inpatient and outpatient settings. Equal provision of service relative to patient need and reducing wait times were also prioritised. However, explicit inclusion of certain equity domains such as discrimination, ensuring equal capability to be healthy and other patient factors was limited.
Physiotherapy triage policies consider various domains of equity to guide resource allocation decisions. Policymakers and service providers can use the insights gained from this study to review the application and operationalisation of equity principles within their healthcare systems through mechanisms such as patient triage tools.
医疗分诊政策对于公平、公正地分配有限资源至关重要。尽管对医疗公平进行了广泛的研究,但在分诊中公平的应用定义上仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚医院物理治疗分诊工具中公平原则是如何运作的,以指导资源分配。
对澳大利亚 10 家医院的 13 项分诊政策进行了回顾性、定性内容分析。收集了来自住院和门诊环境的分诊政策。使用 Lane 等人(2017 年)提出的多维公平操作定义的五个离散域对数据进行了演绎编码:1)卫生服务供应/获取/结果链中的均等化点,2)需求或潜在受益,3)均等化分组,4)均等化的限制,5)足够接近就足够好。使用描述性总结统计数据来分析和呈现报告的公平领域的频率。
在所纳入的分诊工具中,有四个公平领域在纳入的文件中都有体现,以指导决策。基于感知到的患者需求和整体健康结果的分配是住院和门诊环境中共同的指导原则。相对患者需求平等提供服务和减少等待时间也是优先考虑的。然而,明确纳入某些公平领域,如歧视、确保平等的健康能力和其他患者因素是有限的。
物理治疗分诊政策考虑了公平的各个领域,以指导资源分配决策。决策者和服务提供者可以通过患者分诊工具等机制,从这项研究中获得的见解来审查其医疗系统中公平原则的应用和操作。