Jiangsu Police Institute, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 21;19(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04884-9.
This response letter addresses the comments received on our paper. The main points of our response include: Clarification of the definitions of primary and secondary indexes; Justification for the use of the RoB2 tool for quality assessment; Measures to improve sensitivity analysis and data consistency; Explanation and improvement plans regarding the timing of Prospero registration. We have provided detailed explanations of the study design and outlined specific measures for future improvements to enhance research transparency and quality.
这封回复信针对我们论文收到的意见进行了回复。我们的主要回复内容包括:对主要和次要指标定义的澄清;使用 RoB2 工具进行质量评估的理由;改进敏感性分析和数据一致性的措施;有关 PROSPERO 注册时间的说明和改进计划。我们对研究设计进行了详细的解释,并概述了未来改进的具体措施,以提高研究的透明度和质量。