Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Medicine, Essen, Germany.
Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Medicine, Essen, Germany
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):e036050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036050.
Chronic non-specific low back pain is a major public health problem. Evidence supports the effectiveness of exercise as an intervention. Due to a paucity of direct comparisons of different exercise categories, medical guidelines were unable to make specific recommendations regarding the type of exercise working best in improving chronic low back pain. This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials aims to investigate the comparative efficacy of different exercise interventions in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.
MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, SPORTDiscus, Clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal were searched on November 2019 and without language restrictions. The search will be updated after data analysis. Studies on adults with non-specific low back pain of at least 12 weeks duration comparing exercise to either no specific intervention (ie, no treatment, wait-list or usual care at the treating physician's discretion) and/or functionally inert interventions (ie, sham or attention control interventions) will be eligible. Pain intensity and back-specific disability are defined as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include health-related physical and mental quality of life, work disability, frequency of analgesic use and adverse events. All outcomes will be analysed short-term, intermediate-term and long-term. Data will be extracted independently by two review authors. Risk of bias will be assessed using the recommendations by the Cochrane Back and Neck Group and be based on an adaptation of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
This NMA will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses_NMA checklist. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals, implemented in existing national and international guidelines and will be presented to health care providers and decision makers. The planned completion date of the study is 1 July 2021.
CRD42020151472.
慢性非特异性下腰痛是一个主要的公共卫生问题。有证据表明,运动作为一种干预手段是有效的。由于缺乏对不同运动类别的直接比较,医学指南无法就哪种运动类型最能改善慢性下腰痛提出具体建议。本项针对随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在研究慢性非特异性下腰痛患者接受不同运动干预的比较疗效。
我们于 2019 年 11 月检索了 MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、物理治疗证据数据库、SPORTDiscus、Clinicaltrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台搜索门户,检索时未设语言限制,分析后将进行更新。纳入比较至少 12 周持续时间的非特异性下腰痛成人患者、运动与无特定干预(即无治疗、等待名单或治疗医生酌情的常规护理)和/或功能惰性干预(即假或注意对照干预)的研究。疼痛强度和背部特定残疾被定义为主要结局。次要结局将包括与健康相关的身体和精神生活质量、工作残疾、镇痛药使用频率和不良事件。所有结局都将进行短期、中期和长期分析。数据将由两名综述作者独立提取。使用 Cochrane 背部和颈部小组的建议,并根据 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具的改编版来评估偏倚风险。
本 NMA 将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目_NMA 清单进行报告。研究结果将发表在同行评议期刊上,纳入现有的国家和国际指南,并将提供给医疗保健提供者和决策者。研究计划完成日期为 2021 年 7 月 1 日。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020151472。