Suppr超能文献

《爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表(IIFAS-G)德语文本的信度和效度及其与母乳喂养持续时间和喂养方式的关系》

Reliability and validity of the German version of the Iowa infant feeding attitude scale (IIFAS-G) and relations to breastfeeding duration and feeding method.

机构信息

Family Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation Center for Neurodevelopment, Growth, and Nutrition of the Newborn, Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Aug 21;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00665-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public health initiatives (e.g., the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative) have led to an increase in breastfeeding rates worldwide. However, as (exclusive) breastfeeding duration is still below WHO recommendations, it is crucial to understand the factors that influence decisions on breastfeeding practice. Modifiable psychological factors such as intention to breastfeed have therefore become targets of recent interventions. As the intention to breastfeed is among the strongest predictors of breastfeeding duration, reliable tools for measuring the intention to breastfeed are needed. The Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS) measures attitudes towards infant feeding and is used in various languages and across different cultural contexts. However, there has been no German version of the IIFAS (IIFAS-G) so far. The aim of this study was to investigate reliability, validity, and associations of the IIFAS-G with feeding method and breastfeeding duration.

METHODS

Between August and November 2022, a total of 353 mothers (M = 35 years, SD = 4.2 years) of singleton infants (47.3% female (1 undetermined), M = 10.8 months, SD = 4.7 months, age range: 3-547 days; 90.4% living in Switzerland) participated in an online survey. The IIFAS-G was administered as a part of a larger study on early child development and infant feeding method.

RESULTS

The translated IIFAS-G showed unsatisfactory model fit for the two factor 17-item solution. Four items showed low factor loadings. After item reduction, a 13-item two factor solution showed satisfactory model fit (CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.07) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85). The IIFAS-G score was higher for mothers who exclusively breastfed their infants compared to mothers who additionally or exclusively fed infant formula. Moreover, mothers with higher IIFAS-G scores were less likely to stop breastfeeding their child over the course of 1.5years (HR = 0.87).

CONCLUSION

A shorter two-factor IIFAS-G is proposed to investigate attitudes towards breastfeeding and formula feeding in German-speaking mothers.

摘要

背景

公共卫生举措(例如,婴儿友好医院倡议)已促使全球母乳喂养率上升。然而,由于(纯)母乳喂养持续时间仍低于世界卫生组织的建议,因此了解影响母乳喂养实践决策的因素至关重要。可改变的心理因素,如母乳喂养的意愿,因此成为最近干预措施的目标。由于母乳喂养的意愿是母乳喂养持续时间的最强预测因素之一,因此需要可靠的工具来测量母乳喂养的意愿。爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表(IIFAS)测量对婴儿喂养的态度,已在各种语言和不同文化背景下使用。然而,目前还没有 IIFAS 的德文版本(IIFAS-G)。本研究旨在探讨 IIFAS-G 的信度、效度以及与喂养方式和母乳喂养持续时间的关系。

方法

2022 年 8 月至 11 月期间,共有 353 名单胎婴儿的母亲(M=35 岁,SD=4.2 岁;47.3%为女性(1 例未确定),M=10.8 个月,SD=4.7 个月,年龄范围:3-547 天;90.4%居住在瑞士)参与了一项在线调查。IIFAS-G 作为早期儿童发展和婴儿喂养方式的一项更大研究的一部分进行了管理。

结果

翻译后的 IIFAS-G 对两因素 17 项解决方案的模型拟合度不理想。四项指标的因子负荷较低。经过项目删减,13 项两因素解决方案显示出较好的模型拟合度(CFI=0.92,TLI=0.90,RMSEA=0.07)和较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.85)。与仅用婴儿配方奶粉喂养婴儿的母亲相比,纯母乳喂养婴儿的母亲的 IIFAS-G 评分更高。此外,IIFAS-G 评分较高的母亲在 1.5 年内停止母乳喂养的可能性较小(HR=0.87)。

结论

提出了一个更短的两因素 IIFAS-G,用于调查德语母语母亲对母乳喂养和配方奶喂养的态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96fe/11337571/c0a092b6f8f7/13006_2024_665_Fig2_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验