School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2024 Dec;61(12):e14673. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14673. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
There is ongoing debate about whether control-related processing related to cognitive conflict and emotional conflict operate independently. This study manipulated the proportion of congruent to incongruent trials to determine the domain specificity or generality of these two types of conflict control. Two experiments were conducted in which spatial Simon conflict was combined with emotional face-word conflict. In Experiment 1, the proportion congruency (PC) of spatial conflict was manipulated, and in Experiment 2, the PC of emotional conflict was manipulated. The aim was to determine whether control-related processes elicited by cognitive or emotional conflict show domain-specific (within cognitive or within emotional control-related effects) or domain-general effects, where control elicited by cognitive conflict benefits emotional control processes and vice versa. Behavioral findings indicated that spatial and emotional conflict exhibited within-domain PC effects. For event-related brain potential (ERP) activity, PC effects were primarily reflected in a late slow potential, rather than an early negativity, suggesting that control-related adjustments impacted conflict resolution rather than conflict detection. Furthermore, the results did not show evidence of PC effects across domains for behavioral or ERP data, indicating that proactive control elicited by PC manipulation does not transfer across cognitive and emotional conflict. This study supports the modular nature of proactive control for processes related to cognitive and emotional control.
关于认知冲突和情绪冲突相关的控制加工是否独立运作,目前仍存在争议。本研究通过操纵一致和不一致试次的比例,来确定这两种冲突控制的领域特殊性或一般性。本研究进行了两项实验,将空间 Simon 冲突与情绪面孔-词语冲突相结合。在实验 1 中,操纵了空间冲突的比例一致性(PC),在实验 2 中,操纵了情绪冲突的 PC。目的是确定认知或情绪冲突引发的控制相关过程是否表现出领域特异性(在认知或情绪控制相关效应内)或领域一般性效应,即认知冲突引发的控制有利于情绪控制过程,反之亦然。行为研究结果表明,空间和情绪冲突表现出了域内 PC 效应。对于事件相关脑电位(ERP)活动,PC 效应主要反映在一个缓慢的后期电位上,而不是早期负性,这表明控制相关的调整影响了冲突解决,而不是冲突检测。此外,行为和 ERP 数据均未显示跨领域 PC 效应的证据,表明 PC 操作引发的前摄控制不会在认知和情绪冲突之间转移。本研究支持了与认知和情绪控制相关的过程的前摄控制的模块化性质。