• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间竞争中联合侧翼效应的增强。

Enhancement of joint flanker effect in intergroup competition.

作者信息

Zhao Yang, Hu Xucong, Zhou Jifan, Shen Mowei, Xu Haokui

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology, College of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/pchj.796. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1002/pchj.796
PMID:39169680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11787883/
Abstract

Representing the mental state of the partner lays the foundation for successful social interaction. While the representation of group members has been extensively studied, it is unclear how intergroup interactions affect it. In three experiments utilizing the joint flanker task, we found that competition between groups brought about a greater joint flanker effect (Experiment 1). Such phenomenon was not due to competition per se, as competition that occurred between individuals from different groups did not enhance the joint flanker effect (Experiment 2). Using the minimal grouping method to directly manipulate group entitativity, we found that the joint flanker effect was larger when participants perceived the group as being more closely connected; conversely, when they perceived the group as less close, the joint flanker effect was attenuated (Experiment 3). These results suggested that beliefs about the group may be key to how group competition enhanced the joint flanker effect. The potential cognitive mechanisms producing this phenomenon are fully discussed. Overall, our study is the first to explore the impact of intergroup interactions on the joint flanker effect and provides a new perspective on understanding the relationship between within-group representations and intergroup interactions.

摘要

表征同伴的心理状态是成功进行社会互动的基础。虽然对群体成员的表征已得到广泛研究,但尚不清楚群体间互动如何影响它。在三项使用联合侧翼任务的实验中,我们发现群体间的竞争会产生更大的联合侧翼效应(实验1)。这种现象并非源于竞争本身,因为不同群体个体之间的竞争并未增强联合侧翼效应(实验2)。通过使用最小分组法直接操纵群体实体性,我们发现当参与者认为群体联系更紧密时,联合侧翼效应更大;相反,当他们认为群体联系不那么紧密时,联合侧翼效应会减弱(实验3)。这些结果表明,关于群体的信念可能是群体竞争增强联合侧翼效应的关键。我们充分讨论了产生这种现象的潜在认知机制。总体而言,我们的研究首次探讨了群体间互动对联合侧翼效应的影响,并为理解群体内表征与群体间互动之间的关系提供了新视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/a4c5b4d6cf5a/PCHJ-14-94-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/9f78e41d2a5f/PCHJ-14-94-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/f16ff66ceb3b/PCHJ-14-94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/ae7f79f816c1/PCHJ-14-94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/a4c5b4d6cf5a/PCHJ-14-94-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/9f78e41d2a5f/PCHJ-14-94-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/f16ff66ceb3b/PCHJ-14-94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/ae7f79f816c1/PCHJ-14-94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd53/11787883/a4c5b4d6cf5a/PCHJ-14-94-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancement of joint flanker effect in intergroup competition.群体间竞争中联合侧翼效应的增强。
Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/pchj.796. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
2
The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: evidence from the joint Simon task.任务共享中竞争的延续效应:来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e97991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097991. eCollection 2014.
3
Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups.个体和群体差异竞争行为的记忆与体验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):953-66. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.953.
4
Power effects on interindividual and intergroup competition.权力对个体间和群体间竞争的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12831. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12831.
5
Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes: the roles of relativistic concern, perceived categorization, and the doctrine of mutual assured destruction.对应结果领域中的个体间-群体间不连续性:相对论性关注、感知分类和相互确保摧毁原则的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;94(3):479-94. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.479.
6
Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition.组内社会影响和组间竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):975-92. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.975.
7
The effect of competition on children's merit-based resource allocation: The difference between interpersonal and intergroup competition.竞争对儿童基于功绩的资源分配的影响:人际竞争和群体间竞争的差异。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2024 Mar;42(1):49-71. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12467. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
High outgroup entitativity can inhibit intergroup retribution.高外群体同质性会抑制群体间的报复行为。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Jun;54(2):341-58. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12078. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
9
Intergroup Competition in Exergames: Further Tests of the Köhler Effect.群体间竞赛对运动游戏的影响:科勒效应的进一步检验。
Games Health J. 2018 Aug;7(4):240-245. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0122. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
The two sides of competition: competition-induced effort and affect during intergroup versus interindividual competition.竞争的两面性:群体间竞争与个体间竞争中竞争引起的努力和影响。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Aug;104(3):320-38. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02123.x. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.先进信息对共享手指预提示任务中共同表征的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.

本文引用的文献

1
A Shared Intentionality Account of Uniquely Human Social Bonding.一种关于人类独特社会联系的共享意向性解释。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Mar;20(2):264-275. doi: 10.1177/17456916231201795. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Action planning and execution cues influence economic partner choice.行动规划和执行线索会影响经济合作伙伴的选择。
Cognition. 2023 Dec;241:105632. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105632. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
Theory of collective mind.集体心理理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Nov;27(11):1019-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization.群体形成与人类社会组织的演化。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):320-334. doi: 10.1177/17456916231179156. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
5
Interpersonal utility and children's social inferences from shared preferences.人际效用与儿童基于共同偏好的社会推理
Cognition. 2023 Mar;232:105344. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105344. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
6
Planning with Theory of Mind.运用心理理论进行规划。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;26(11):959-971. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
Action co-representation under threat: A Social Simon study.动作共同表象在威胁下:一项社会西蒙研究。
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104829. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104829. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Members of highly entitative groups are implicitly expected to behave consistently based on their deep-level goals instead of their shallow-level movements.高度实体化群体的成员被隐含地期望根据其深层次的目标而不是其浅层的行为来表现一致。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jan;48(1):13-28. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001009. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
9
Action Generalization Across Group Members: Action Efficiency Matters.跨群体成员的动作泛化:动作效率很重要。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12957. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12957.
10
Too Many Cooks: Bayesian Inference for Coordinating Multi-Agent Collaboration.太多厨子:用于协调多主体协作的贝叶斯推断。
Top Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;13(2):414-432. doi: 10.1111/tops.12525. Epub 2021 Apr 7.