Lam Melanie Y, Weeks Daniel J, Chua Romeo
Department of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.
Department of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, St. Francis Xavier University, P.O. Box 5000, Antigonish, NS, B2G 2W5, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.
Effective joint action relies on co-representation, where individuals integrate each other's tasks to achieve a shared task goal. This study examined how advanced information influences co-representation in a shared 4-choice finger precuing task where participants made discrete keypress responses to visual stimuli appearing at preassigned spatial locations. The five precue types varied in the amount of information about the upcoming stimulus location. In Experiment 1, participants first shared the 4-choice finger precuing task while sitting face-to-face (Joint 4-Choice, J4C), then they completed the entire 4-choice task alone (Solo 4-Choice, S4C). As anticipated, the standard precuing effect (reaction times [RTs] decrease as the amount of advanced information provided by the precue increases) was observed in the S4C task. However, a joint precuing effect was not elicited in the J4C task, suggesting that co-representation did not transpire. In Experiment 2, participants completed a modified solo version of the 4-choice finger precuing task (Solo 2-Choice, S2C), responding to only two of the four stimuli (Go trials) and ignoring the other two (NoGo trials). After completing the S2C task, participants completed the S4C task. The S2C task did not exhibit the standard precuing effect observed in the S4C task. Further analysis revealed that RTs were primarily influenced by the number of stimulus-response alternatives and modulated by the Go/NoGo context. Lastly, in Experiment 3, participants were seated side-by-side to enhance social context and verify that the spatial arrangement in Experiment 1 (face-to-face) did not inadvertently disrupt the social context needed to elicit co-representation. Despite eliminating this potential confounding factor by increasing proximity, no joint precuing effect was elicited. These findings advance our understanding of co-representation by demonstrating that it is not an automatic outcome of shared tasks and requires specific conditions (e.g., simultaneous actions, group-level representations) to manifest.
有效的联合行动依赖于共同表征,即个体整合彼此的任务以实现共同的任务目标。本研究考察了在一项共享的4选项手指预提示任务中,提前信息如何影响共同表征。在该任务中,参与者对出现在预先指定空间位置的视觉刺激做出离散的按键反应。五种预提示类型在关于即将出现的刺激位置的信息量上有所不同。在实验1中,参与者首先面对面坐着共同完成4选项手指预提示任务(联合4选项,J4C),然后他们单独完成整个4选项任务(单独4选项,S4C)。正如预期的那样,在S4C任务中观察到了标准的预提示效应(反应时间[RTs]随着预提示提供的提前信息量增加而减少)。然而,在J4C任务中并未引发联合预提示效应,这表明共同表征并未发生。在实验2中,参与者完成了4选项手指预提示任务的一个修改后的单独版本(单独2选项,S2C),只对四个刺激中的两个做出反应(执行试验),而忽略另外两个(不执行试验)。完成S2C任务后,参与者完成S4C任务。S2C任务没有表现出在S4C任务中观察到的标准预提示效应。进一步分析表明,反应时间主要受刺激-反应选项数量的影响,并受到执行/不执行情境的调节。最后,在实验3中,参与者并排就座以增强社会情境,并验证实验1中的空间安排(面对面)不会无意中破坏引发共同表征所需的社会情境。尽管通过增加亲近程度消除了这一潜在的混杂因素,但仍未引发联合预提示效应。这些发现通过证明共同表征不是共享任务的自动结果,而是需要特定条件(例如同步行动、群体层面的表征)才能显现,从而推进了我们对共同表征的理解。