• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用盖茨协议估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)时进行深度校正的侧后法:它与通过血浆采样的金标准GFR估算方法可比吗?

Lateral Posterior Method for Depth Correction while Using the Gates Protocol for GFR Estimation: Is it Comparable to the Gold Standard GFR Estimation by Plasma Sampling?

作者信息

Gokhale Shefali Madhur

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sadhu Vaswani Missions Medical Complex, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

World J Nucl Med. 2024 May 17;23(3):168-175. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787100. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787100
PMID:39170837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11335384/
Abstract

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation by Gates protocol using the gamma camera for diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) dynamic renography has not compared well with the gold standard GFR by plasma sampling method. This is because depth of the kidneys is generally not considered. Our aim was to study whether manual depth correction using the skin to middle of kidney distance in lateral view and posterior aspect-lateral posterior method would reduce the bias in the Gates GFR as compared with the gold standard.  Retrospective study of 27 adult prospective renal donors who underwent GFR by plasma sampling and DTPA dynamic renography at Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India between January 2022 and April 2023. The entire data was statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS ver 21.0, IBM Corporation, United States) for MS Windows.  There is no significant agreement between plasma sampling versus gamma camera method and plasma sampling versus lateral posterior method for depth correction for GFR measurements; however, the evidence of systemic bias is lower for the gamma camera method compared with the lateral posterior method for depth correction as against the plasma sampling method.  The lateral posterior method for depth correction while using the gamma camera-based Gates protocol is not a reliable method for depth correction in the western Indian adult population with preserved renal function.

摘要

通过使用伽马相机进行二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)动态肾图检查的盖茨协议来估计肾小球滤过率(GFR),与采用血浆采样法的金标准GFR相比,效果不佳。这是因为肾脏深度通常未被考虑在内。我们的目的是研究,与金标准相比,采用侧位视图中皮肤到肾中点的距离以及后位 - 侧后位方法进行手动深度校正,是否会减少盖茨GFR中的偏差。

对2022年1月至2023年4月期间在印度马哈拉施特拉邦浦那的英拉克斯和布德拉尼医院接受血浆采样和DTPA动态肾图检查以测定GFR的27名成年潜在肾供体进行回顾性研究。使用适用于MS Windows的社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 21.0版,IBM公司,美国)对全部数据进行统计分析。

在GFR测量的深度校正方面,血浆采样与伽马相机法之间以及血浆采样与侧后位法之间均无显著一致性;然而,与血浆采样法相比,伽马相机法进行深度校正时系统性偏差的证据比侧后位法更低。

在基于伽马相机的盖茨协议中使用侧后位法进行深度校正,对于肾功能正常的印度西部成年人群体而言,并非一种可靠的深度校正方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/2c77ef610325/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/e80e56159185/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/86b1790a0aba/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/580c383268f9/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/359ce21117b5/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/edd49f3921dc/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/fead47a2bee2/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/5edd1cefa95a/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/248653071b67/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/2c77ef610325/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/e80e56159185/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/86b1790a0aba/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/580c383268f9/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/359ce21117b5/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/edd49f3921dc/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/fead47a2bee2/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/5edd1cefa95a/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/248653071b67/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/2c77ef610325/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-9.jpg

相似文献

1
Lateral Posterior Method for Depth Correction while Using the Gates Protocol for GFR Estimation: Is it Comparable to the Gold Standard GFR Estimation by Plasma Sampling?在使用盖茨协议估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)时进行深度校正的侧后法:它与通过血浆采样的金标准GFR估算方法可比吗?
World J Nucl Med. 2024 May 17;23(3):168-175. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787100. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Feasibility of gamma camera-based GFR measurement using renal depth evaluated by lateral scan of Tc-DTPA renography.使用 Tc-DTPA 肾动态显像的侧位扫描评估肾深度来进行基于伽玛相机的肾小球滤过率测量的可行性。
Ann Nucl Med. 2020 May;34(5):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s12149-020-01455-w. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in indian population.基于血清肌酐的估算方程与门控协议在预测印度人群肾小球滤过率方面的比较。
Indian J Nephrol. 2017 Mar-Apr;27(2):124-128. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.200515.
4
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate measured by plasma sample technique, Cockroft Gault method and Gates' method in voluntary kidney donors and renal transplant recipients.血浆样本技术、Cockcroft Gault法和Gates法测量肾小球滤过率在活体肾供体和肾移植受者中的比较。
Indian J Nucl Med. 2013 Jul;28(3):144-51. doi: 10.4103/0972-3919.119544.
5
Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method and plasma sample method.肾小球滤过率测定方法的比较:锝-99m-二乙三胺五乙酸肾动态显像、预测肌酐清除率法和血浆样本法。
Ann Nucl Med. 2003 Oct;17(7):561-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03006669.
6
Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: low and high-dose Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method, and plasma sample method.肾小球滤过率测定方法的比较:低剂量和高剂量锝-99m-二乙三胺五乙酸肾动态显像、预测肌酐清除率法及血浆样本法
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(4):1059-65. doi: 10.1007/s11255-008-9446-4. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
7
Comparison of Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Methods between Radionuclide in vivo Scintigraphic Gates' and Plasma Sampling.放射性核素体内闪烁门控法与血浆采样法测量肾小球滤过率的比较
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 30;7(17):2734-2738. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.794. eCollection 2019 Sep 15.
8
Impact of Body Mass Index on Gates Method of Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation: A Comparative Study with Single Plasma Sample Method.体重指数对肾小球滤过率估算的盖茨方法的影响:与单血浆样本法的比较研究
Indian J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;34(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_112_18.
9
Determination of Glomerular Filtration Rate with CT Measurement of Renal Clearance of Iodinated Contrast Material versus Tc-DTPA Dynamic Imaging "Gates" Method: A Validation Study in Asymmetrical Renal Disease.应用碘对比剂肾清除率 CT 测量值与 Tc-DTPA 动态成像“门”法测定肾小球滤过率:在非对称性肾脏疾病中的验证性研究。
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):552-560. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160425. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Comparison between Two-sample Method with Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates' Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population.健康肾脏供体人群中,锝-二乙烯三胺五乙酸双样本法、盖茨法与公式法估算的肾小球滤过率值的比较
Indian J Nucl Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;32(3):188-193. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_17_17.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishment of a formula for the estimation of kidney depth in adults and its effect on glomerular filtration rate assessment.建立成人肾脏深度估计公式及其对肾小球滤过率评估的影响。
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1535-1543. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-614.
2
New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race.新型基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的估算肾小球滤过率方程,无需考虑种族因素。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1737-1749. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102953. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in indian population.
基于血清肌酐的估算方程与门控协议在预测印度人群肾小球滤过率方面的比较。
Indian J Nephrol. 2017 Mar-Apr;27(2):124-128. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.200515.
4
Establishing a new formula for estimating renal depth in a Chinese adult population.建立一种用于估算中国成年人群肾脏深度的新公式。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(5):e5940. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005940.
5
Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a subject-specific two-compartment model.使用个体特异性双室模型通过动态对比增强磁共振成像测量肾小球滤过率。
Physiol Rep. 2016 Apr;4(7). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12755. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate measured by plasma sample technique, Cockroft Gault method and Gates' method in voluntary kidney donors and renal transplant recipients.血浆样本技术、Cockcroft Gault法和Gates法测量肾小球滤过率在活体肾供体和肾移植受者中的比较。
Indian J Nucl Med. 2013 Jul;28(3):144-51. doi: 10.4103/0972-3919.119544.
7
Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects.使用动态对比增强磁共振成像测量单肾功能:人体受试者中两种模型的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Nov;24(5):1117-23. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20699.
8
Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults.成人肾深度估计的改良公式。
J Nucl Med. 1993 Oct;34(10):1766-9.
9
Kidney depth measurement and its influence on quantitation of function from gamma camera renography.肾脏深度测量及其对γ相机肾图功能定量的影响。
Clin Nucl Med. 1985 Jun;10(6):398-401. doi: 10.1097/00003072-198506000-00002.
10
[Re-estimation of renal function with 99mTc-DTPA by the Gates' method].
Kaku Igaku. 1987 Apr;24(4):389-96.