Suppr超能文献

在使用盖茨协议估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)时进行深度校正的侧后法:它与通过血浆采样的金标准GFR估算方法可比吗?

Lateral Posterior Method for Depth Correction while Using the Gates Protocol for GFR Estimation: Is it Comparable to the Gold Standard GFR Estimation by Plasma Sampling?

作者信息

Gokhale Shefali Madhur

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sadhu Vaswani Missions Medical Complex, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

World J Nucl Med. 2024 May 17;23(3):168-175. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787100. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation by Gates protocol using the gamma camera for diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) dynamic renography has not compared well with the gold standard GFR by plasma sampling method. This is because depth of the kidneys is generally not considered. Our aim was to study whether manual depth correction using the skin to middle of kidney distance in lateral view and posterior aspect-lateral posterior method would reduce the bias in the Gates GFR as compared with the gold standard.  Retrospective study of 27 adult prospective renal donors who underwent GFR by plasma sampling and DTPA dynamic renography at Inlaks and Budhrani Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India between January 2022 and April 2023. The entire data was statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS ver 21.0, IBM Corporation, United States) for MS Windows.  There is no significant agreement between plasma sampling versus gamma camera method and plasma sampling versus lateral posterior method for depth correction for GFR measurements; however, the evidence of systemic bias is lower for the gamma camera method compared with the lateral posterior method for depth correction as against the plasma sampling method.  The lateral posterior method for depth correction while using the gamma camera-based Gates protocol is not a reliable method for depth correction in the western Indian adult population with preserved renal function.

摘要

通过使用伽马相机进行二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)动态肾图检查的盖茨协议来估计肾小球滤过率(GFR),与采用血浆采样法的金标准GFR相比,效果不佳。这是因为肾脏深度通常未被考虑在内。我们的目的是研究,与金标准相比,采用侧位视图中皮肤到肾中点的距离以及后位 - 侧后位方法进行手动深度校正,是否会减少盖茨GFR中的偏差。

对2022年1月至2023年4月期间在印度马哈拉施特拉邦浦那的英拉克斯和布德拉尼医院接受血浆采样和DTPA动态肾图检查以测定GFR的27名成年潜在肾供体进行回顾性研究。使用适用于MS Windows的社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 21.0版,IBM公司,美国)对全部数据进行统计分析。

在GFR测量的深度校正方面,血浆采样与伽马相机法之间以及血浆采样与侧后位法之间均无显著一致性;然而,与血浆采样法相比,伽马相机法进行深度校正时系统性偏差的证据比侧后位法更低。

在基于伽马相机的盖茨协议中使用侧后位法进行深度校正,对于肾功能正常的印度西部成年人群体而言,并非一种可靠的深度校正方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae2/11335384/e80e56159185/10-1055-s-0044-1787100-i2430004-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验