• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2022 年,在一家高容量住院康复诊所中,对 2141 名德国患者进行了根治性前列腺切除术,评估了他们的尿控结局、手术切缘状态和并发症。

Urinary continence outcomes, surgical margin status, and complications after radical prostatectomy in 2,141 German patients treated in one high-volume inpatient rehabilitation clinic in 2022.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.

Center for Urological Rehabilitation, Kliniken Hartenstein, Bad Wildungen, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Aug 22;42(1):494. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05200-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05200-0
PMID:39172140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11341598/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify independent predictors of urinary continence and report early complications after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large, contemporary German cohort.

METHODS

Urinary incontinence data of patients undergoing 3-week inpatient rehabilitation (IR) after RP were prospectively assessed by 24-hr pad test and uroflowmetry at the beginning and the end of IR, respectively. Lymphoceles were assessed prospectively by ultrasound. Tumor and patient characteristics, and information on urinary leakage on initial cystography were retrospectively extracted from discharge letters and surgical reports. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of urinary continence at the beginning of IR.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,141 patients were included in the final analyses. Anastomotic leakage on the initial cystography and lymphoceles were found in 11.4% and 30.8% of patients, respectively. Intervention for a symptomatic lymphocele was required in 4.2% of patients. At the end of IR, 54.2% of patients were continent, while the median urine loss decreased to 73 g (interquartile range 15-321). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age and diabetes mellitus as independent negative predictors, but nerve-sparing surgery as an independent positive predictor of urinary continence (each p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that 24-hr urine loss increased by 7 g with each year of life (p < 0.001), was 79 g higher in patients with diabetes mellitus (p = 0.007), and 175 g lower in patients with NS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Age, diabetes mellitus, and NS are significantly associated with continence outcomes in the early period after RP. Our analyses may help clinicians to pre-operatively counsel patients on potential surgical outcomes.

摘要

目的

在一个大型的当代德国队列中,确定尿失禁的独立预测因素,并报告根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)的早期并发症。

方法

通过 24 小时尿垫试验和尿流率分别在 RP 后 3 周住院康复(IR)开始和结束时对接受 3 周住院康复(IR)的患者进行尿失禁数据的前瞻性评估。通过超声前瞻性评估淋巴囊肿。从出院记录和手术报告中回顾性提取肿瘤和患者特征以及初始膀胱造影时尿漏的信息。回归分析用于确定 IR 开始时尿失禁的预测因素。

结果

总体而言,共有 2141 例患者纳入最终分析。在初始膀胱造影中发现吻合口漏和淋巴囊肿的患者分别占 11.4%和 30.8%。需要对有症状的淋巴囊肿进行干预的患者占 4.2%。在 IR 结束时,54.2%的患者无尿失禁,而中位尿失重量减少至 73 克(四分位距 15-321)。多变量逻辑回归分析确定年龄和糖尿病为独立的负面预测因素,但神经保留手术为尿失禁的独立阳性预测因素(均 p<0.001)。多变量线性回归分析表明,每增加 1 岁,24 小时尿液丢失增加 7 克(p<0.001),糖尿病患者的尿液丢失增加 79 克(p=0.007),NS 患者的尿液丢失减少 175 克(p<0.001)。

结论

年龄、糖尿病和 NS 与 RP 后早期的尿失禁结果显著相关。我们的分析可以帮助临床医生在术前向患者提供潜在的手术结果咨询。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ef2/11341598/4b1d9add1744/345_2024_5200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ef2/11341598/4b1d9add1744/345_2024_5200_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ef2/11341598/4b1d9add1744/345_2024_5200_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Urinary continence outcomes, surgical margin status, and complications after radical prostatectomy in 2,141 German patients treated in one high-volume inpatient rehabilitation clinic in 2022.2022 年,在一家高容量住院康复诊所中,对 2141 名德国患者进行了根治性前列腺切除术,评估了他们的尿控结局、手术切缘状态和并发症。
World J Urol. 2024 Aug 22;42(1):494. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05200-0.
2
Short-Term Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy Is Still Based on Patients' Age, Nerve-Sparing Approach, and Surgical-Experience, Despite the Higher-Use of Robotic Surgery in 2022 Compared to 2016 Real-World Results of a Large Rehabilitation Center in Germany.尽管与2016年相比,2022年德国一家大型康复中心的机器人手术使用率更高,但前列腺癌根治术后的短期尿失禁仍取决于患者年龄、保留神经的手术方式和手术经验。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Dec;7(12):e70092. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70092.
3
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
4
Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy.保留神经手术技术,而非保留神经血管束,可提高前列腺癌根治术后的长期控尿率。
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):584-589. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
5
The prognostic value of cystography-measured bladder capacity on very early continence rates after radical prostatectomy.膀胱造影测量的膀胱容量对前列腺癌根治术后极早期控尿率的预后价值。
Urologia. 2025 Feb;92(1):148-153. doi: 10.1177/03915603241293839. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
6
Predictive factors of immediate continence after conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution retrospective study.传统机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后即刻控尿的预测因素:一项单机构回顾性研究
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;30(1):134-143. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02653-6. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
7
The preoperative pad test as a predictor of urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, observational, clinical study.术前垫试验预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁和生活质量:一项前瞻性、观察性、临床研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Jan;52(1):67-76. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02301-3. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
10
Urinary continence outcomes of four years of follow-up and predictors of early and late urinary continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者四年随访的尿控结局及早期和晚期尿控的预测因素。
BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00601-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.评估机器人根治性前列腺切除术患者阳性切缘对死亡率的影响:来自欧洲泌尿外科学会机器人泌尿外科分会科学工作组的 20 年报告。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Aug;7(4):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
Continence criteria of 193 618 patients after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.193618 例开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的控尿标准。
BJU Int. 2024 Jul;134(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/bju.16180. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Treatment decision regret in long-term survivors after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study.
根治性前列腺切除术后长期生存者的治疗决策后悔:一项纵向研究。
BJU Int. 2023 May;131(5):623-630. doi: 10.1111/bju.15955. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study).局限性前列腺癌治疗的功能和生活质量结局(前列腺癌检测和治疗研究 [ProtecT])。
BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-380. doi: 10.1111/bju.15739. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?在随机环境下根治性前列腺切除术的年龄分层结果(LAP-01):年轻患者损失更多吗?
World J Urol. 2022 May;40(5):1151-1158. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03945-0. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
6
How Does Age Affect Urinary Continence following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? A Prospective Multi-Institutional Study Using Independently Collected, Validated Questionnaires.年龄如何影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的尿控?一项使用独立收集、验证问卷的前瞻性多机构研究。
J Urol. 2022 May;207(5):1048-1056. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002391. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
7
Psychosocial Distress in the Early Recovery Period after Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后早期康复期的心理社会困扰。
Urol Int. 2022;106(9):891-896. doi: 10.1159/000519483. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
8
Metabolic syndrome, levels of androgens, and changes of erectile dysfunction and quality of life impairment 1 year after radical prostatectomy.代谢综合征、雄激素水平与根治性前列腺切除术后 1 年勃起功能障碍及生活质量损害的变化。
Asian J Androl. 2021 Jul-Aug;23(4):370-375. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_88_20.
9
Is there a clinical benefit from prostate cancer center certification? An evaluation of functional and oncologic outcomes from 22,649 radical prostatectomy patients.前列腺癌中心认证是否具有临床获益?来自 22649 例根治性前列腺切除术患者的功能和肿瘤学结局评估。
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03411-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Diabetic neuropathy.糖尿病性神经病。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Jun 13;5(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0097-9.