• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to design equitable digital health tools: A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities.如何设计公平的数字健康工具:对设计策略、案例研究及机遇的叙述性综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 22;3(8):e0000591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
4
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Gaps in Artificial Intelligence Research for Rural Health in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国农村卫生人工智能研究的差距:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 27:2025.06.26.25330361. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.26.25330361.
6
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Neonatal Nurses' Understanding of the Factors That Enhance and Hinder Early Communication Between Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Narrative Inquiry Study.新生儿护士对促进和阻碍早产儿与其父母早期沟通因素的理解:一项叙事探究研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70093.

引用本文的文献

1
A Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention (Shift) to Manage Problem Anger After Trauma: Co-Design and Development Study.一种管理创伤后问题性愤怒的即时自适应干预(转变):协同设计与开发研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 22;12:e62960. doi: 10.2196/62960.
2
Co-Designing, Developing, and Testing a Mental Health Platform for Young People Using a Participatory Design Methodology in Colombia: Mixed Methods Study.在哥伦比亚运用参与式设计方法共同设计、开发和测试一个针对年轻人的心理健康平台:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 6;12:e66558. doi: 10.2196/66558.
3
Big data approaches for novel mechanistic insights on sleep and circadian rhythms: a workshop summary.用于深入了解睡眠和昼夜节律新机制的大数据方法:研讨会总结
Sleep. 2025 Jun 13;48(6). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaf035.
4
Supporting teams with designing for dissemination and sustainability: the design, development, and usability of a digital interactive platform.为传播和可持续性设计提供支持的团队:一个数字互动平台的设计、开发与可用性
Implement Sci. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01410-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital health interventions for all? Examining inclusivity across all stages of the digital health intervention research process.数字健康干预面向所有人?审视数字健康干预研究过程各个阶段的包容性。
Trials. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07937-w.
2
Digital Methods for the Spiritual and Mental Health of Generation Z: Scoping Review.Z世代精神心理健康的数字方法:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Feb 6;13:e48929. doi: 10.2196/48929.
3
Exploring Generation Z and Young Millennials' Perspectives of a Spiritual Self-Care App and Their Spiritual Identity (Skylight): Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.探索Z世代和年轻千禧一代对一款精神自我关怀应用程序及其精神身份认同(天窗)的看法:定性半结构化访谈研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 28;7:e54284. doi: 10.2196/54284.
4
Quantifying digital health inequality across a national healthcare system.量化国家医疗体系中的数字健康不平等。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Nov 24;30(1):e100809. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100809.
5
Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) reporting tool: developing a checklist for policymakers.健康公平影响评估(HEIA)报告工具:为政策制定者制定检查表。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Nov 18;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02031-0.
6
How digital health translational research is prioritised: a qualitative stakeholder-driven approach to decision support evaluation.数字化健康转化研究如何得到优先重视:一种基于利益相关者的定性方法,用于决策支持评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 6;13(11):e075009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075009.
7
Access to Technology and Digital Literacy as Determinants of Health and Health Care.技术获取和数字素养作为健康和医疗保健的决定因素。
Creat Nurs. 2023 Aug;29(3):258-263. doi: 10.1177/10784535231211682. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
8
Exploring the feasibility of a mental health application (JoyPop) for Indigenous youth.探索一款针对原住民青年的心理健康应用程序(JoyPop)的可行性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 6;14:1269347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1269347. eCollection 2023.
9
Considerations for addressing bias in artificial intelligence for health equity.解决人工智能中影响健康公平性的偏差的考量因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Sep 12;6(1):170. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00913-9.
10
A Spiritual Self-Care Mobile App (Skylight) for Mental Health, Sleep, and Spiritual Well-Being Among Generation Z and Young Millennials: Cross-Sectional Survey.一款针对Z世代和年轻千禧一代心理健康、睡眠及精神福祉的精神自我护理移动应用程序(天窗):横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 27;7:e50239. doi: 10.2196/50239.

如何设计公平的数字健康工具:对设计策略、案例研究及机遇的叙述性综述

How to design equitable digital health tools: A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities.

作者信息

Bucher Amy, Chaudhry Beenish M, Davis Jean W, Lawrence Katharine, Panza Emily, Baqer Manal, Feinstein Rebecca T, Fields Sherecce A, Huberty Jennifer, Kaplan Deanna M, Kusters Isabelle S, Materia Frank T, Park Susanna Y, Kepper Maura

机构信息

Behavioral Reinforcement Learning Lab (BReLL), Lirio, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.

School of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 22;3(8):e0000591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591
PMID:39172776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340894/
Abstract

With a renewed focus on health equity in the United States driven by national crises and legislation to improve digital healthcare innovation, there is a need for the designers of digital health tools to take deliberate steps to design for equity in their work. A concrete toolkit of methods to design for health equity is needed to support digital health practitioners in this aim. This narrative review summarizes several health equity frameworks to help digital health practitioners conceptualize the equity dimensions of importance for their work, and then provides design approaches that accommodate an equity focus. Specifically, the Double Diamond Model, the IDEAS framework and toolkit, and community collaboration techniques such as participatory design are explored as mechanisms for practitioners to solicit input from members of underserved groups and better design digital health tools that serve their needs. Each of these design methods requires a deliberate effort by practitioners to infuse health equity into the approach. A series of case studies that use different methods to build in equity considerations are offered to provide examples of how this can be accomplished and demonstrate the range of applications available depending on resources, budget, product maturity, and other factors. We conclude with a call for shared rigor around designing digital health tools that deliver equitable outcomes for members of underserved populations.

摘要

在美国,受国家危机和旨在促进数字医疗创新的立法推动,人们重新关注健康公平,数字健康工具的设计者需要采取审慎步骤,在工作中进行公平设计。需要一个具体的健康公平设计方法工具包,以支持数字健康从业者实现这一目标。本叙述性综述总结了几个健康公平框架,以帮助数字健康从业者将对其工作重要的公平维度概念化,然后提供以公平为重点的设计方法。具体而言,探讨了双钻石模型、IDEAS框架和工具包,以及参与式设计等社区协作技术,作为从业者征求服务不足群体成员意见并更好地设计满足其需求的数字健康工具的机制。这些设计方法中的每一种都要求从业者做出审慎努力,将健康公平融入方法之中。提供了一系列使用不同方法纳入公平考量的案例研究,以举例说明如何做到这一点,并展示根据资源、预算、产品成熟度和其他因素可用的应用范围。我们呼吁在设计为服务不足人群提供公平结果的数字健康工具时保持共同的严谨性。