Suppr超能文献

肾结石清除术:经皮肾镜取石术与开放手术取石术对比

Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy.

作者信息

Brannen G E, Bush W H, Correa R J, Gibbons R P, Elder J S

出版信息

J Urol. 1985 Jan;133(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)48761-1.

Abstract

Percutaneous removal of most urinary tract calculi may be performed as a 1-stage effort with techniques and skills developed recently in the specialties of urology and radiology. Ultrasonic fragmentation of most calculi was done to permit their extraction. Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy was performed on 250 consecutive (a single exception) patients bearing stones that required removal. Targeted calculi were removed successfully from 97 per cent of these patients. One patient required surgical lithotomy. The previous 100 patients with stones underwent surgical lithotomy with 96 per cent success. Complications of percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy appeared equitable with those of surgical lithotomy. Of the patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy 6 (6 per cent) required extended hospital days or additional procedures for management of complications. None of these patients required a surgical incision. Anesthesia times were similar for both groups--average 159 plus or minus 4 (standard error) minutes for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy and 193 plus or minus 8 minutes for surgical lithotomy. Hospital recovery days averaged 5.5 plus or minus 0.3 for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy and 8.4 plus or minus 0.5 for surgical lithotomy (p less than 0.01). Associated costs averaged $7,203 plus or minus 55 for lithotripsy and $8,849 plus or minus 660 for lithotomy (p less than 0.01). The number of narcotic administrations per patient (days 1 to 5 postoperatively) averaged 9.88 plus or minus 0.70 for lithotripsy and 16.82 plus or minus 0.78 for lithotomy (p less than 0.01). The average patient who underwent percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy felt capable of full activity 2.0 plus or minus 0.2 weeks following stone removal, whereas no patient who underwent previous surgical lithotomy recalls a recovery period of less than 3 weeks (p less than 0.01). We believe that most upper urinary tract calculi may be removed cost-effectively with a percutaneous approach. Compared to surgical lithotomy, percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy may result in rapid convalescence with diminished pain.

摘要

随着泌尿外科和放射科近年来技术和技能的发展,大多数尿路结石可通过经皮穿刺一次性取出。对大多数结石进行超声碎石以利于取出。对250例连续(仅1例除外)有结石需要取出的患者进行了经皮超声碎石术。这些患者中有97%的目标结石成功取出。1例患者需要进行手术取石。之前的100例结石患者接受了手术取石,成功率为96%。经皮超声碎石术的并发症与手术取石术相当。在接受经皮超声碎石术的患者中,有6例(6%)因并发症需要延长住院时间或进行额外治疗。这些患者均无需手术切口。两组的麻醉时间相似——经皮超声碎石术平均为159±4(标准误)分钟,手术取石术为193±8分钟。经皮超声碎石术的平均住院恢复天数为5.5±0.3天,手术取石术为8.4±0.5天(p<0.01)。碎石术的相关平均费用为7203±55美元(手术取石术为8849±660美元,p<)。每位患者(术后第1至5天)的麻醉剂使用次数平均为:碎石术为9.88±0.70次,手术取石术为16.82±0.78次(p<0.01)。接受经皮超声碎石术的患者平均在结石取出后2.0±0.2周能够完全恢复活动,而之前接受手术取石术的患者无一回忆起恢复时间少于3周(p<0.01)。我们认为,大多数上尿路结石采用经皮穿刺方法取出具有成本效益。与手术取石术相比,经皮超声碎石术可使患者康复更快,疼痛减轻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验