Department of STEM Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0076.
Biology education research provides important guidance for educators aiming to ensure access for disabled students. However, there is still work to be done in developing similar guidelines for research settings. By using critical frameworks that amplify the voices of people facing multiple forms of marginalization, there is potential to transform current biology education research practices. Many biology education researchers are still in the early stages of understanding critical disability frameworks, such as Disability Critical Race Studies (DisCrit), which consists of seven tenets designed to explore the intersecting experiences of ableism and racism. Our Research Methods Essay uses DisCrit as a model framework and pulls from other related critical disability frameworks to empower disabled voices in biology education research. Drawing from existing scholarship, we discuss how biology education researchers can design, conduct, and share research findings. Additionally, we highlight strategies that biology education scholars can use in their research to support access for participants. We propose the creation and sharing of Access and Equity Maps to help plan-and make public-the steps researchers take to foster access in their research. We close by discussing frequently asked questions researchers may encounter in taking on critical frameworks, such as DisCrit.
生物教育研究为教育工作者提供了重要的指导,旨在确保残疾学生能够获得教育。然而,在为研究环境制定类似的指导方针方面,仍有许多工作要做。通过使用批判性框架来放大面临多种形式边缘化的人的声音,有可能改变当前的生物学教育研究实践。许多生物学教育研究人员仍处于理解批判性残疾框架的早期阶段,例如残疾批判种族研究(DisCrit),它由七个原则组成,旨在探索残疾歧视和种族主义的交叉经验。我们的研究方法文章将 DisCrit 作为一个模型框架,并借鉴其他相关的批判性残疾框架,赋予生物学教育研究中残疾声音的力量。我们从现有文献中讨论了生物学教育研究人员如何设计、进行和分享研究成果。此外,我们还强调了生物学教育学者可以在研究中使用的策略,以支持参与者的参与。我们建议创建和共享访问和公平地图,以帮助规划和公开研究人员在研究中促进访问的步骤。最后,我们讨论了研究人员在采用批判性框架(例如 DisCrit)时可能遇到的常见问题。