Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar8. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0026.
Advancing equity and justice in undergraduate biology education requires research to address the experiences of disabled students. Scholars working in disability studies have developed models of disability that inform Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER). To date, DBER literature has been predominantly informed by the medical and social models of disability. The medical model focuses on challenges that affect people with disabilities on an individual basis, while the social model focuses on how one's surrounding environment contributes to the construction of disability. In this essay, we discuss past DBER research and opportunities for future research using each of these models. We will also discuss a third, less commonly used model that offers exciting opportunities to drive future research: complex embodiment. Complex embodiment positions disability as a social location that reflects a greater societal value structure. Further examining this value structure reveals how ability itself is constructed and conventionally understood to be hierarchical. Additionally, we explain epistemic injustice as it affects disabled people, and how future education research can both address and counteract this injustice. We discuss how expanding the frameworks that serve as lenses for DBER scholarship on disability will offer new research directions.
推进本科生物学教育中的公平正义需要研究来解决残疾学生的经历。从事残疾研究的学者们已经开发出了残疾模型,这些模型为基于学科的教育研究(DBER)提供了信息。迄今为止,DBER 文献主要受到残疾的医学和社会模式的启发。医学模式侧重于影响个人残疾的挑战,而社会模式侧重于一个人的周围环境如何促成残疾的构建。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了过去的 DBER 研究以及使用这些模型进行未来研究的机会。我们还将讨论第三个不太常用的模型,它为推动未来研究提供了令人兴奋的机会:复杂体现。复杂体现将残疾定位为反映更大的社会价值结构的社会位置。进一步研究这种价值结构揭示了能力本身是如何构建的,以及它通常被理解为是分层的。此外,我们解释了影响残疾人士的认识不公正,以及未来的教育研究如何能够解决和纠正这种不公正。我们讨论了扩展作为残疾 DBER 奖学金视角的框架将为新的研究方向提供机会。