Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK.
Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 22;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01525-0.
Care home staff are key providers of palliative and end-of-life care. Yet, little is known about how care home characteristics can influence care leader's confidence in their ability to provide optimal palliative and end-of-life care.
To understand the influence of care home registration type (nursing, residential or dual registered) and size on senior care leader's confidence to provide palliative and end-of-life care.
An explanatory sequential mixed methods study comprising an online cross-sectional survey (including the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale) and qualitative individual interviews. Analysis of survey data used a multivariate logistic regression and qualitative interview data used Framework Analysis. A 'Following the Thread' method was undertaken for data integration.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: UK care home senior care leaders, purposively sampled by registration type, size and geographical location.
The online survey (N = 107) results indicated that nursing home senior care leaders had higher confidence scores on the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale than residential care home leaders (aOR: 3.85, 95% CI 1.20-12.31, p = 0.02). Care home size did not show effect when adjusting for registration type (medium - aOR 1.71, 95% CI 0.59-4.97, p = 0.33; large - aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.18-2.30, p = 0.5). Interviews (n = 27) identified three themes that promote confidence, (1) 'feelings of preparedness' stemming from staff expertise and experience and care home infrastructure, (2) 'partnership working' with external services as a valued member of the multidisciplinary team, and (3) a shared language developed from end-of-life care guidance.
Care home senior care leader's confidence is influenced by care home characteristics, particularly availability of on-site registered nurses and the infrastructure of large care homes. All care home leaders benefit from training, working with external, multidisciplinary teams and use of guidance. However, mechanisms to achieve this differed by care home type and size. Further exploration is needed on successful integration of palliative care services and interventions to enhance confidence in residential care homes.
养老院工作人员是提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的关键提供者。然而,对于养老院的特点如何影响护理领导者提供最佳姑息治疗和临终关怀的能力,我们知之甚少。
了解养老院注册类型(护理、居住或双重注册)和规模对高级护理领导者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀能力的信心的影响。
一项解释性顺序混合方法研究,包括在线横断面调查(包括姑息护理自我效能量表)和定性个体访谈。调查数据分析采用多变量逻辑回归,定性访谈数据采用框架分析。采用“循线”方法进行数据整合。
设置/参与者:英国养老院高级护理领导者,根据注册类型、规模和地理位置进行有针对性的抽样。
在线调查(N=107)结果表明,与居住养老院的领导者相比,护理院的高级护理领导者在姑息护理自我效能量表上的信心得分更高(优势比:3.85,95%置信区间 1.20-12.31,p=0.02)。当调整注册类型时,养老院规模并未显示出影响(中等-优势比 1.71,95%置信区间 0.59-4.97,p=0.33;大型-优势比 0.65,95%置信区间 0.18-2.30,p=0.5)。访谈(n=27)确定了三个增强信心的主题,(1)“准备感”源于员工的专业知识和经验以及养老院的基础设施,(2)“合作工作”与外部服务合作,作为多学科团队的有价值成员,(3)从临终关怀指南中发展出的共同语言。
养老院高级护理领导者的信心受到养老院特点的影响,特别是现场注册护士的可用性和大型养老院的基础设施。所有养老院领导者都受益于培训、与外部多学科团队合作以及使用指南。然而,不同类型和规模的养老院实现这一目标的机制不同。需要进一步探索成功整合姑息治疗服务和干预措施,以增强对居住养老院的信心。