Soytemel Ebru, Saglam Erol
Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Br J Sociol. 2025 Jan;76(1):19-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13143. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
This article builds on data and field work notes from two ethnographic studies conducted in two cities: Istanbul and Trabzon, Turkey. It examines the socio-political dynamics behind the prevalence and impact of conspiratorial narratives. We explore the emergence, circulation, and effects of these narratives and how they shape political orientations and mobilisation. We raise methodological questions about these narratives and propose researchers closely scrutinise them rather than dismissing them as illogical or incoherent. Our research reveals three novel relational and methodological insights derived from conspiratorial narratives. First, these narratives serve as sense-making tools during times of uncertainty. They provide accessible explanations for abrupt changes, and they rely and draw upon 'cultural repertoires'. Second, by challenging the mainstream narratives, they shape subjectivities; empowering narrators to act as agents. Third, how conspiratorial narratives circulate has implications for the dynamics of state-public relationships, often following the neoliberal logic, they portray political leaders as central figures in navigating complex decision-making processes. Our case studies demonstrate that actors, even in less powerful positions, may not necessarily antagonise the state. We underscore the methodological significance of these narratives for researchers, to examine actors' agency, group dynamics, and responses to everyday injustices.
本文基于在土耳其的伊斯坦布尔和特拉布宗两个城市进行的两项民族志研究的数据和实地工作笔记。它考察了阴谋论叙事的盛行及其影响背后的社会政治动态。我们探究这些叙事的出现、传播及其影响,以及它们如何塑造政治倾向和动员行动。我们提出了关于这些叙事的方法论问题,并建议研究人员对其进行仔细审视,而不是将其视为不合逻辑或不连贯而不予理会。我们的研究揭示了从阴谋论叙事中得出的三个新颖的关系性和方法论见解。第一,这些叙事在不确定时期充当意义建构工具。它们为突然变化提供易懂的解释,并且依赖并借鉴“文化资源”。第二,通过挑战主流叙事,它们塑造主体性;使叙述者能够作为行动者采取行动。第三,阴谋论叙事的传播方式对国家与公众关系的动态产生影响,它们常常遵循新自由主义逻辑,将政治领导人描绘成应对复杂决策过程的核心人物。我们的案例研究表明,即使处于权力较小地位的行为者也不一定与国家对抗。我们强调这些叙事对研究人员的方法论意义,以便考察行为者的能动性、群体动态以及对日常不公正现象的反应。