Heindel Patrick, Fitzgibbon James J, Secemsky Eric, Bhatt Deepak L, Al-Omran Mohammed, Verma Subodh, Almaghlouth Ibrahim A, Madenci Arin, Hussain Mohamad A
Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Aug 13;4(4):oeae062. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae062. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Recent evidence from randomized trials demonstrates that colchicine can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease. Colchicine's effect on lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is not known.
To make inferences about the real-world effectiveness of colchicine in PAD, we emulated two target trials leveraging the variable prescribing practice of adding colchicine vs. a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) to urate-lowering therapy in patients with gout and PAD. Emulated Trial 1 compared colchicine initiators with NSAID initiators. Emulated Trial 2 compared long-term (indefinite) and short-term (3 months) treatment strategies after initiating colchicine. Eligible individuals were those continuously enrolled in Medicare receiving care at a multicentre academic health system between July 2007 and December 2019. The primary outcome for both trials was a 2 year composite of major adverse limb events (MALE), MACE, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included MALE and death, MACE and death, and individual components of the primary outcome. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Percentile-based 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using non-parametric bootstrapping. A total of 1820 eligible patients were included; the mean age was 77 years [standard deviation (SD) 7], 32% were female, and 9% were non-White. The mean (SD) duration of colchicine and NSAID therapy was 247 (345) and 137 (237) days, respectively. In the emulation of Trial 1, the risk of the primary composite outcome of MALE, MACE, and death at 2 years was 29.9% (95% CI 27.2%, 32.3%) in the colchicine group and 31.5% (28.3%, 34.6%) in the NSAID group, with a risk difference of -1.7% (95% CI -6.5%, 3.1%) and a risk ratio of 0.95 (95% CI 0.83, 1.07). Similar findings were noted in the emulation of Trial 2, with a risk of the primary composite outcome at 2 years of 30.7% (95% CI 23.7%, 38.1%) in the long-term colchicine group and 33.4% (95% CI 29.4%, 37.7%) in the short-term group, with a risk difference of -2.7% (95% CI -10.3%, 5.4%) and risk ratio of 0.92 (95% CI 0.70, 1.16).
In a real-world sample of patients with PAD and gout, estimates of the effect of colchicine were consistent across two analyses and provided no conclusive evidence that colchicine decreased the risk of adverse cardiovascular or limb events and death. The cardiovascular and limb benefits of colchicine in older, comorbid populations with PAD and advanced systematic atherosclerosis remain uncertain.
随机试验的最新证据表明,秋水仙碱可降低冠心病患者发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险。秋水仙碱对下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)的影响尚不清楚。
为了推断秋水仙碱在PAD中的实际疗效,我们模拟了两项目标试验,利用在痛风和PAD患者的降尿酸治疗中添加秋水仙碱与非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的不同处方实践。模拟试验1比较了秋水仙碱起始者与NSAID起始者。模拟试验2比较了起始秋水仙碱后的长期(无限期)和短期(3个月)治疗策略。符合条件的个体是2007年7月至2019年12月期间在多中心学术医疗系统中持续参加医疗保险接受治疗的患者。两项试验的主要结局是2年主要不良肢体事件(MALE)、MACE和全因死亡率的复合结局。次要结局包括MALE和死亡、MACE和死亡,以及主要结局的各个组成部分。采用逆概率加权法调整混杂因素。基于百分位数的95%置信区间(CI)采用非参数自助法估计。共纳入1820例符合条件的患者;平均年龄为77岁[标准差(SD)7],32%为女性,9%为非白人。秋水仙碱和NSAID治疗的平均(SD)持续时间分别为247(345)天和137(237)天。在模拟试验1中,秋水仙碱组2年时MALE、MACE和死亡的主要复合结局风险为29.9%(95%CI 27.2%,32.3%),NSAID组为31.5%(28.3%,34.6%),风险差异为-1.7%(95%CI -6.5%,3.1%),风险比为0.95(95%CI 0.83,1.07)。在模拟试验2中也观察到类似结果,长期秋水仙碱组2年时主要复合结局风险为30.7%(95%CI 23.7%,38.1%),短期组为33.4%(95%CI 29.4%,37.7%),风险差异为-2.7%(95%CI -10.3%,5.4%),风险比为0.92(95%CI 0.70,1.16)。
在PAD和痛风患者的真实样本中,两项分析中秋水仙碱疗效的估计结果一致,且未提供确凿证据表明秋水仙碱可降低不良心血管或肢体事件及死亡风险。秋水仙碱在合并PAD和晚期系统性动脉粥样硬化的老年合并症患者中的心血管和肢体益处仍不确定。