Sherwood David, Dovgan Jakob, Schirmer Derek, Haring R Sterling, Schneider Byron
University Health Lakewood Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics; Kansas City, MO, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department; Nashville, TN, United States.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jun 5;19:100334. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100334. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Is there a statistically significant association between preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESI) and postoperative cervical and lumbar spinal surgery infections (SSI)?
A systematic review and meta-analysis was completed of patients 18 years or older who underwent elective cervical or lumbar spinal surgery. Those who underwent surgery with preoperative ESI were compared to those without. We assessed for differences in postoperative SSI incidence. Electronic literature databases were searched through October 2022. Peer-reviewed publications that included raw data regarding epidural exposure and non-exposure were included. Case reports, case series, abstracts, editorials, or publications that did not include raw data were excluded. Odd's ratios (OR) were calculated from the raw data collected. Meta-analysis was done using RevMan v5 with a fixed effects model.
We identified 16 articles for inclusion. When not controlling for the type of surgery and time from ESI to surgery, there was a statistically significant OR between preoperative ESI and postoperative SSI. The association persisted when the ESI was performed within 30 days or 31-90 days of the surgery. No association was discovered when evaluating only cervical spine surgeries. The evidence is assigned a "moderate" GRADE rating.
Our analysis shows a small, time-dependent, statistically significant association between preoperative ESI and postoperative lumbar SSI may exist. However, the OR produced, while statistically significant, are close enough to 1.0 that clinically, the effect size is "small." The number needed to treat for an ESI in the appropriate clinical setting is, at worst, 3. The number needed to harm, meaning the number of patients who undergo an ESI at any time before their spine surgery and then develop a SSI, is 111 patients. Ultimately, the surgical sparing potential from an ESI outweighs the SSI risk based on our findings.
术前硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)与术后颈椎和腰椎脊柱手术感染(SSI)之间是否存在统计学上的显著关联?
对18岁及以上接受择期颈椎或腰椎脊柱手术的患者进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。将术前接受ESI手术的患者与未接受ESI手术的患者进行比较。我们评估了术后SSI发生率的差异。检索电子文献数据库至2022年10月。纳入了包含硬膜外暴露和未暴露原始数据的同行评审出版物。排除病例报告、病例系列、摘要、社论或不包含原始数据的出版物。根据收集的原始数据计算优势比(OR)。使用RevMan v5软件采用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。
我们确定了16篇纳入文章。在不控制手术类型和从ESI到手术的时间时,术前ESI与术后SSI之间存在统计学上显著的OR。当ESI在手术30天内或31 - 90天内进行时,这种关联仍然存在。仅评估颈椎手术时未发现关联。证据被评为“中等”质量等级。
我们的分析表明,术前ESI与术后腰椎SSI之间可能存在小的、时间依赖性的统计学显著关联。然而,所产生的OR虽然在统计学上显著,但足够接近1.0,以至于在临床上,效应大小为“小”。在适当的临床环境中,进行ESI导致不良事件发生的患者数量,最坏的情况下为3例。造成伤害所需的患者数量,即脊柱手术前任何时间接受ESI然后发生SSI的患者数量为111例。最终,基于我们的研究结果,ESI的手术获益潜力超过了SSI风险。